Re: Status of Flash 9 on stable

2008-10-16 Thread Mark Kane
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008, at 22:28:58 +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: Patches have been committed to CURRENT and should have been MFC'ed last weekend, but haven't for some reason. The port has a PR waiting for maintainer feedback: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=127839 The relevant

Re: Status of Flash 9 on stable

2008-10-16 Thread Mark Kane
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008, at 23:05:26 +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 02:25:37PM -0500, Mark Kane wrote: Hi. I'm using RELENG_7 as of yesterday which appears to have the linprocfs fixes from CURRENT, and I also updated linux-flashplayer9 with the patch from the above

Re: Status of Flash 9 on stable

2008-10-16 Thread Mark Kane
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008, at 16:52:35 -0500, Sean C. Farley wrote: I had something like that until I smacked my forehead after a few hours and realized I had not added linprocfs to /etc/fstab. That may be your problem at least with nspluginwrapper. Sean linprocfs was indeed not mounted, sorry

Re: Daily Panics on 6.2-STABLE (page fault/Fatal trap 12)

2007-03-21 Thread Mark Kane
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007, at 22:14:50 -0600, Mark Kane wrote: Hi everyone. I'm getting kernel panics daily or even multiple times a day on a new machine. When it's running everything works well, but over the last day or two I've been getting multiple panics per day at seemingly random times

Daily Panics on 6.2-STABLE (page fault/Fatal trap 12)

2007-02-20 Thread Mark Kane
Hi everyone. I'm getting kernel panics daily or even multiple times a day on a new machine. When it's running everything works well, but over the last day or two I've been getting multiple panics per day at seemingly random times. When the first panic happened, all I did was open up a new tab in

Re: Machine hangs when loading snd_emu10k1

2006-10-15 Thread Mark Kane
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006, at 12:38:58 +0200, Joel Dahl wrote: So, loading snd_emu10k1 worked before the last rebuild? Could you perhaps do a binary search and try to narrow it down to a specific commit? On September 21, I rebuilt world/kernel and did the normal update procedure. The module loaded

Re: Machine hangs when loading snd_emu10k1

2006-10-14 Thread Mark Kane
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006, at 19:32:39 -0500, Mark Kane wrote: Hi everyone. I rebooted my machine today and when it came back up and I tried to load the snd_emu10k1 kernel module, the machine hung without returning to the prompt. I tried waiting 5-10+ minutes and it was totally irrecoverable

Machine hangs when loading snd_emu10k1

2006-10-13 Thread Mark Kane
Hi everyone. I rebooted my machine today and when it came back up and I tried to load the snd_emu10k1 kernel module, the machine hung without returning to the prompt. I tried waiting 5-10+ minutes and it was totally irrecoverable. At that point, nothing had changed since the last reboot so it was

Re: ath based card

2006-09-28 Thread Mark Kane
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006, at 18:30:52 +0200, Zoran Kolic wrote: Hi all! I would like to hear opinion of pc card choice for laptop and atheros chip: netgear wag511 d-link dwl-ag650 linksys wpc55ag Good and bad. Prior to make idiot of me and buy wrong. Zoran Hi. I've got

Re: quota and snapshots in 6.1-RELEASE

2006-05-23 Thread Mark Kane
Mike Jakubik wrote: Rong-en Fan wrote: On 5/23/06, Dmitriy Kirhlarov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, list. Some time ago quota and, AFAIR, snapshots in 6.1-RELEASE has deadlock problems. What the current situation with this? I'm ready to test patches, if needed. WBR IIRC, there are some quota

Re: SATA Failure Introduced between 6.0 and 6.1-RC1

2006-05-13 Thread Mark Kane
Jared wrote: Hi -stable! I'd like to bring something to the attention of -stable that was posted to -amd64 but has not yet being resolved: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=amd64/95554 I'm unable to test to see if this occurs on i386 aswell so am unsure if this is the right list

Re: Link for the FreeBSD 6.1 Schedule?

2006-03-05 Thread Mark Kane
Tobias Kilb wrote: Hi guys, has anyone the link for the FreeBSD 6.1 Schedule Page (Open Tasks, Bugs, etc...). I can't find the link thanks, Tobias Here it is: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.1R/ -Mark -- GnuPG Public Key: http://www.mkproductions.org/mk_pubkey.asc Internet Radio:

Re: Release Schedule for 2006

2005-12-17 Thread Mark Kane
Bill Nicholls wrote: Let me add my voice to this discussion. I have been a happy user of FreeBSD from 4.0 thru 4.11, but have stumbled repeatedly on 5.x and now 6.0. For some reason, I can get these (5 6) installed, but not stable or running KDE, yet 4.11 runs solid for months. In

Re: ad10: WARNING - READ_DMA UDMA ICRC error (retrying request) LBA=11441599

2005-08-17 Thread Mark Kane
Mark Kirkwood wrote: Mark Kane wrote: I do have a tall Antec case, and have both 200's and the 160 in 5 1/4 inch trays so the cables for those are long (36 inches IIRC). Hmm - 36 inch cable, makes me wonder if that is what is causing the problem in UDMA133 mode. IIRC the ATA spec says 18

Re: ad10: WARNING - READ_DMA UDMA ICRC error (retrying request) LBA=11441599

2005-08-17 Thread Mark Kane
Mark Kane wrote: I'm glad that it looks like running it at 100 will solve this. Thanks for the replies. I was probably going to go through all the hassle of getting an Asus board to replace this because I was almost certain it was hardware, but I don't think it's worth it as long as this works

Re: ad10: WARNING - READ_DMA UDMA ICRC error (retrying request) LBA=11441599

2005-08-16 Thread Mark Kane
I've been having similar problems on 5.4-RELEASE. I have a brand new board back from the factory (a RMA) and had a thread going on freebsd-questions about this. I currently have six Maxtor 7200RPM ATA133 hard drives that I've been trying on and off and with various configurations in my

Re: ad10: WARNING - READ_DMA UDMA ICRC error (retrying request) LBA=11441599

2005-08-16 Thread Mark Kane
Mike Tancsa wrote: Yes, I have had Maxtor drives in the past where they would not work properly at certain bus speeds-- even back in the RELENG_4 days. Also, doesnt UDMA133 assume no slave ? I would just run them at 100. I dont think you would see much of a difference anyways. Perhaps