Re: Upgrading 5.3 > 6.0 buildworld failure now in libmagic

2005-12-09 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Friday 09 December 2005 11:31, vizion wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Michael C. Shultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 10:32 AM > > To: vizion > > Cc: 'Peter Jeremy'; 'Doug Barton' > > Su

Re: Upgrading 5.3 > 6.0 buildworld failure now in libmagic

2005-12-08 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Thursday 08 December 2005 08:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > From: Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: 2005/12/08 Thu AM 01:34:42 PST > > To: Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > CC: Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > > Subject: Re: Upgrading 5.3 > 6.0 buildworld fa

Re: Freebsd 5.3 screw up.... deleted /lib/libc.so.5

2005-11-27 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Sunday 27 November 2005 16:42, ebm wrote: > After I deleted this very valuable file I realized what I did. Since I > don't have a old boot disk laying around is my only option to upgrade to > a newer version of freebsd? Try this: cd /usr/sbin ./sysinstall then install the minimal binary pac

Re: Handbook DHCPD needs update?

2005-11-27 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Sunday 27 November 2005 11:57, Mark Space wrote: > (This missive is going to both freebsd-stable and freebsd-doc.) > > Hi all, I just got done setting up my brand spankin' new FreeBSD 6 > (release) server for DHCPD, and I found an ommision in the online > handbook. I'm a newbie at FreeBSD but I

Re: gnome-upgrade.sh

2005-11-11 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Friday 11 November 2005 07:23, Jan Grant wrote: > On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > > > One last thing, if you make a script that does the conversion, might > > > > I have a copy? Here is how I'll set up pm-020.conf to work: > > > >

Re: gnome-upgrade.sh

2005-11-11 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Friday 11 November 2005 09:04, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > "Michael C. Shultz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Friday 11 November 2005 08:32, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > > > "Michael C. Shultz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Works

Re: gnome-upgrade.sh

2005-11-11 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Friday 11 November 2005 08:32, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > "Michael C. Shultz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Works good, just one thing, portmanager has no dependencies, like to keep > > it that way. > > It's not necessary to consider that an issue: thi

Re: gnome-upgrade.sh

2005-11-11 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Friday 11 November 2005 07:29, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > On Friday 11 November 2005 07:23, Jan Grant wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > > > > One last thing, if you make a script that does the conversion, > > > > > might I have

Re: gnome-upgrade.sh

2005-11-11 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Friday 11 November 2005 07:23, Jan Grant wrote: > On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > > > One last thing, if you make a script that does the conversion, might > > > > I have a copy? Here is how I'll set up pm-020.conf to work: > > > >

Re: gnome-upgrade.sh

2005-11-11 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Friday 11 November 2005 06:26, Jan Grant wrote: > On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > On Friday 11 November 2005 05:58, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > > On Friday 11 November 2005 05:58, Jan Grant wrote: > > > > On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shu

Re: gnome-upgrade.sh

2005-11-11 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Friday 11 November 2005 05:58, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > On Friday 11 November 2005 05:58, Jan Grant wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > > > [on wildcards in portmanager rules] > > > > > Silly me, I get it now. Not supported yet bu

Re: gnome-upgrade.sh

2005-11-11 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Friday 11 November 2005 05:58, Jan Grant wrote: > On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > [on wildcards in portmanager rules] > > > Silly me, I get it now. Not supported yet but I like the idea so am > > adding it to the things to do list. This one will be

Re: gnome-upgrade.sh

2005-11-11 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Friday 11 November 2005 05:44, Jan Grant wrote: > On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > On Friday 11 November 2005 01:43, Jan Grant wrote: > > > My pkgtools.conf has hundreds(! - busy workstation) of entries along > > > these lines - some entries appl

Re: gnome-upgrade.sh

2005-11-11 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Friday 11 November 2005 01:43, Jan Grant wrote: > Hope you don't mind me taking you up on your offer to someone else :-) - > this is more of a feature request from a portupgrade user who'd like to > migrate. > > On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > >

Re: gnome-upgrade.sh

2005-11-10 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Thursday 10 November 2005 11:32, Paul T. Root wrote: > Things are running better now. I moved it to a dedicated > DSL line in my lab, and it's chugging along. > > I see an occasional g_vfs_done message fly across. Error 16 > on a read. > Something like > g_vfs_done: acd0[READ(offset=81920, leng

Re: gnome-upgrade.sh

2005-11-10 Thread Michael C. Shultz
upgrade, please keep me informed. Just to let you know, the current version of portmanager is 0.3.3_2 if anything goes wrong check that first "portmanager -v". If any problems arise I am more than happy to work with you in solving them quickly. -Mike

Re: gnome-upgrade.sh

2005-11-10 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 18:26, Paul Root wrote: > Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > *** > > This message has been scanned by the InterScan for CSC-SSM and found to > > be free of known security risks. ***-*** > > port and install

Re: gnome-upgrade.sh

2005-11-09 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 14:41, Alistair wrote: > Michael C. Shultz wrote: > >On Wednesday 09 November 2005 13:46, Paul T. Root wrote: > >>This script is one of the most frustrating things ever > >>written. > >> > >>[Snip] > > > >As an

Re: gnome-upgrade.sh

2005-11-09 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 13:46, Paul T. Root wrote: > This script is one of the most frustrating things ever > written. > > I made a fresh install (from CD) of 6.0R. In the install > I added gnome2, sudo, and bash. That's it. Gnome came up fine. > bash is great, sudo works. > > Now, since gnom

Re: New user confused by need to do huge upgrade

2005-11-07 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Monday 07 November 2005 15:49, Alistair wrote: > Hello, All > > I am a user of Linux for many years (and an aged BSD sysadmin from > 1985-1989), but laterly mainly use Gentoo. FreeBSD seemed to be a good > alternative, so I get the 6.0 release a few days after it was released. > > Being a Gento

Re: Strange warning while upgrading

2005-11-06 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Sunday 06 November 2005 11:01, Guillaume R. wrote: > Hello > Today I decided to upgrade my box from 5.4 to 6.O. So I change the right > option in my stable-supfile and go through the process of upgrading. > I can't build the world, and the error message was: > "/usr/src/share/mk/bsd.compat.mk",

Re: burncd and dvd-drives

2005-11-04 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Friday 04 November 2005 00:18, you wrote: > I was and am a great fan of the burncd utility. > Very fast, simple and cli.. > > But as almost any new computer is supplied with a dvd drive this nice > program has become quit useless. It does not support those drives. > > My question is: will it eve

Re: Easy way to kill a 5.x/6.x box as a basic user.

2005-10-27 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Thursday 27 October 2005 17:12, Carl Makin wrote: > Morning All, > > I've been playing with some GIS software and 32Mb TIFF images. Running > ImageMagick's "convert" utility under my normal user login to convert > the image to gif or jpeg blows away the system every time. No panic > seen on t

Re: Problems with PCI SATA controller (bug in ATA driver? both ATAng and ATAmkIII)

2005-10-19 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Wednesday 19 October 2005 21:15, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 04:30:48AM +0200, Alson van der Meulen wrote: > > (Please CC me in replies as I'm not a subscriber of this list) > > > > Update: I tested with an i810-based mainboard (Celeron 1GHz, RTL8139 > > ethernet, Promise SATAI

Re: HEADS UP! Debugging, SMP changed in RELENG_6

2005-09-17 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Saturday 17 September 2005 21:00, Scott Long wrote: > All, > > I've turned off kernel deubgging (INVARIANTS, WITNESS, KDB) and malloc > debugging (the default is now 'aj) in the RELENG_6 branch in preparation > for 6.0-BETA5. I've also turned off SMP in the i386 and amd64 GENERIC > kernels and

Re: Audigy LS and Netgear WG311 drivers

2005-09-06 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Tuesday 06 September 2005 09:04, Brandon Beamer wrote: > I'm running FreeBSD 5.4. I have a Soundblaster Audigy LS and a Netgear > WG311 v3 wireless PCI card. The ath driver does not recognize the > Netgear card and the emu10k1 driver does not recognize the Audigy. I've > searched online and also

Re: RELENG_6 SATA drive error

2005-07-12 Thread Michael C. Shultz
> Michael C. Shultz wrote: > >I have one IDE and two SATA drives in my system. With > >FreeBSD 5.4 the system would not boot from the SATA > >drive so I use the IDE as the primary then mount > >the SATA drives in fstab. I tried upgrading to RELENG_6 > >and wi

RELENG_6 SATA drive error

2005-07-12 Thread Michael C. Shultz
I have one IDE and two SATA drives in my system. With FreeBSD 5.4 the system would not boot from the SATA drive so I use the IDE as the primary then mount the SATA drives in fstab. I tried upgrading to RELENG_6 and with the new kernel one of the SATA drives errors out and so can't be mounted. I

Re: Newbie Question About System Update

2005-04-18 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Monday 18 April 2005 04:51 pm, Jim Campbell wrote: > I've been away from *NIX a few years. I have been playing with FreeBSD > for a week or so now with mixed results. I am using release 4.11 > because for some reason 5.3 has problems seeing my hard drives. 4.11, > Red Hat Linux and NetBSD hav

Re: Apache Signal 11 (5.3-RELEASE-p3/4)

2005-03-19 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Saturday 19 March 2005 04:58 am, Vlad wrote: > I have the same problem, started at some point since 5.3-p? > > I thought something is wrong with the particular server, but since > other people report the same issue, I started to doubt that. > > Apache has been built manually, so it has nothing t

Re: Apache Signal 11 (5.3-RELEASE-p3/4)

2005-03-17 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Thursday 17 March 2005 10:28 am, Kyle Mott wrote: > I've already sent this question to freebsd-questions; forgive me if > this is the wrong list. > > This just very recently started to happen (and I haven't upgraded > Apache as of late either, or any other software for that matter). I > keep get

Re: Linking with CUPS Issue

2005-03-03 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Thursday 03 March 2005 02:04 am, Jake Stride wrote: > I have had a look on google and the archives and although I have seen > people with a similar issue I have not been able to find an answer to > the issue I have. > > I am trying to compile the magicolor 2430DL printer dirvers and keep > runni

Re: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted)

2005-03-02 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Wednesday 02 March 2005 09:09 pm, Edwin Brown wrote: > I didn't cut and paste that. I had to copy everything by hand. It's > correct in the make.conf. > > Best, > > Edwin > OK, did you try just using -O? There is a note about that in the make.conf file. -Mike

Re: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted)

2005-03-02 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Wednesday 02 March 2005 08:48 pm, Edwin Brown wrote: > I've built 5.3 Stable as of tonight 03/02/2005 with the following in > make.conf > > CPUTYPE=i686 > CFLAGS=-02 -pipe > > It was built on a p4. CFLAGS should be -O2 not -02 and you really may want to concider just -O -Mike _

Re: Xorg 6.8.1

2005-02-26 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Saturday 26 February 2005 02:49 pm, you wrote: > On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 01:38:22PM -0800, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > Try setting in /etc/make.conf > > > > X_WINDOW_SYSTEM=xfree86-4 > > > > There is an entry in /usr/ports/UPDATING about it. > > > &g

Re: Xorg 6.8.1

2005-02-26 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Saturday 26 February 2005 01:19 pm, Gary Kline wrote: > On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 09:49:00PM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > > On Saturday, 26. February 2005 13:05, Godwin Stewart wrote: > > > On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 22:25:24 +1030, "Daniel O'Connor" > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Y

Re: Trials and tribulations on mirroring....

2005-01-18 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Tuesday 18 January 2005 09:46 pm, Karl Denninger wrote: > Hi folks; > > I've been running 4.x quite happily for some time, and am trying to > set up a box with 5.3 that hopefully will end up being a viable > platform to move over to. > > Tried on both 5.3-RELEASE and 5.3-STABLE (built this eveni

Re: portsdb and portupgrade causes errors

2004-12-23 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Thursday 23 December 2004 10:43 pm, you wrote: > On Thu, 23 Dec 2004, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > Way back when, I used to get the INDEX when running cvsup unless > > I put it in the refuse file. Of coarse it was old and useless so > > one was better off building their ow

Re: portsdb and portupgrade causes errors

2004-12-23 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Thursday 23 December 2004 09:59 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 09:42:37PM -0800, Brian Behlendorf wrote: > > >run make fetchindex not make fetch index from /usr/ports > > > > Out of curiosity, why isn't the index included in the update > > normally? > > It changes dozens of t

Re: portsdb and portupgrade causes errors

2004-12-23 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Thursday 23 December 2004 09:42 pm, Brian Behlendorf wrote: > On Thu, 23 Dec 2004, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > On Thursday 23 December 2004 08:50 pm, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > >> These days it is best to run make fetch index from /usr/ports > >> after you've r

Re: portsdb and portupgrade causes errors

2004-12-23 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Thursday 23 December 2004 08:50 pm, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > These days it is best to run make fetch index from /usr/ports > after you've run cvsup rather than build INDEX-5 for yourself. > > -Mike correction: run make fetchindex not make fetch i

Re: portsdb and portupgrade causes errors

2004-12-23 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Thursday 23 December 2004 08:37 pm, whitevamp wrote: > i dont know weathere this place to be posting this to or not .. if > not point me in the right direction to go.. > > i have just updated my system to 5.3 frrom 4.9 and now every time i > goto run portsdb , or portupgrade iget the same error

buildworld fails at sbin/ifconfig

2004-03-06 Thread Michael C. Shultz
I installed RELENG_4_9 from ftp5??.freebsd.org on 4 March then cvsup'ed stable and tried buildworld and received the following result. Other than buildworld fails everthing else seems to be running fine. I've tried searching the mail lists for anyone else with a similar problem and have co