Re: wrong patch number in releng/10.1?

#0: Wed May 13 06:54:13 UTC 2015 FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p10 #0: Wed May 13 06:54:13 UTC 2015 10.1-RELEASE-p10 It seems to me the verions numbering is not correct, but the patch *is* there, it should be 10.1-p11, right? 10 jun 2015 kl. 11:01 skrev Palle Girgensohn gir...@freebsd.org: Hi

Dell DRAC card snatches keyboard console

Hi! I just installed a Dell 2850 with a DRAC card and a PS/2 keyboard. The keyboard stopped working when entering multiuser mode, and I found an old email on current from September 2004, where Brooks said to comment away ukbd lines in devd.conf. I did, PS/2 keyboard works but the DRAC remote

Re: Dell DRAC card snatches keyboard console

FreeBSD 6.0 (IA32), sorry... --On onsdag, november 23, 2005 17.32.19 +0100 Palle Girgensohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! I just installed a Dell 2850 with a DRAC card and a PS/2 keyboard. The keyboard stopped working when entering multiuser mode, and I found an old email on current from

Re: linking problems with heimdal in base (ports version works)

--On måndag, oktober 17, 2005 18.18.56 -0400 Brian Fundakowski Feldman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 09:04:58PM +0400, Igor Pokrovsky wrote: On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 06:35:51PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: On Sunday, 16. October 2005 09:06, Igor Pokrovsky wrote: On

linking problems with heimdal in base (ports version works)

Hi! I'm having some difficulties using the heimdal installed from /usr/src. Here's the difference between the heimdal port and the heimdal distributed in the base: $ ldd /usr/local/lib/libkrb5.so /usr/local/lib/libkrb5.so: libcrypto.so.3 = /lib/libcrypto.so.3 (0x281b3000)

Re: linking problems with heimdal in base (ports version works)

--On fredag, oktober 14, 2005 17.40.03 +0200 Michael Nottebrock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday, 14. October 2005 17:29, Michael Nottebrock wrote: On Friday, 14. October 2005 16:04, Palle Girgensohn wrote: This gives me problems. I maintain the postgresql ports, and postgresql

linking problems with heimdal in base (ports version works)

Hi! I'm having some difficulties using the heimdal installed from /usr/src. Here's the difference between the heimdal port and the heimdal distributed in the base: $ ldd /usr/local/lib/libkrb5.so /usr/local/lib/libkrb5.so: libcrypto.so.3 = /lib/libcrypto.so.3 (0x281b3000)

Proliant 380 G4

Hi! Just a quick check - a client is getting a Proliant 380 G4 with a 6i Raid controller. Haven't used this hardware before. Will it work fine with FreeBSD? Which version will work best, 5.4 or 4.11? Any peculiarities or things to think about? Any input appreciated! Thanks Palle

Re: PANIC in RELENG_5

), uid 0: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) pid 75212 (squid), uid 0: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) Palle Girgensohn wrote: --On tisdag, juni 07, 2005 18.03.55 +0200 Kay Abendroth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, today I had another panic on my FreeBSD-Box. The last one occured 4 days ago

Re: 5.4-RELEASE lockups on amd64 SMP

--On måndag, juni 06, 2005 19.57.03 -0400 Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 06:54:05PM -0500, Grooms, Matthew wrote: My appologies. With the debug options listed in my previous post ( should have read 5.4 not 5.3 ), I got a lock order reversal. After a while, it

Re: PANIC in RELENG_5

--On tisdag, juni 07, 2005 18.03.55 +0200 Kay Abendroth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, today I had another panic on my FreeBSD-Box. The last one occured 4 days ago. Please reply if sth. is missing. Kind regards, Kay Hi! What brand is your machine? Can you supply a dmesg?

RE: 5.4 panic at lockmgr - update

--On tisdag, juni 07, 2005 22.08.42 +0100 Gray Lilley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did I read somewhere that you need PAE enabled for over 4GB of ram? I could be horribly wrong, but my 0.02p worth :) Either that or the amd64, yes. But without it, the system will not see all the memory, and

Repeatable crash with 5.4-p1-RELEASE and SMP

Hi! This is very similar to Brendan White problem just reported here. My guess is it is the very same problem. I've reported the same problem on some occasions before (although I use amd64, so my postings are to [EMAIL PROTECTED]). My system is also Dell 2850, dual CPUs, 3GB RAM, running

savecore: first and last dump headers disagree

Hi! We have an amd64 system that still experiences crashes after installing 5.4, mostly during high loads. (It's been unstable all the time, really; see previous posts.) I've added dumpdev=/dev/amrd0s2b, and some time ago I did get coredumps, but with latest versions of the kernel, savecore

system does not reboot after panic (Was: savecore: first and last dump headers disagree)

--On måndag, maj 23, 2005 10.30.47 +0200 Palle Girgensohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! We have an amd64 system that still experiences crashes after installing 5.4, mostly during high loads. (It's been unstable all the time, really; see previous posts.) I've added dumpdev=/dev/amrd0s2b

background_fsck=no does not work?

Hi! on a 5.4-prerelease machine (dell 2850 dual cpu, running amd64), I have this in rc.conf: fsck_y_enable=YES background_fsck=NO Still, I'm not certain that fsck is really run at startup. At least, running fsck on in multiuser reveals information like below, but perhaps that is normal for an

Re: background_fsck=no does not work?

--On söndag, april 24, 2005 11.25.31 -0700 Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 01:45:47PM +0200, Palle Girgensohn wrote: ... BLK(S) MISSING IN BIT MAPS SALVAGE? no Running fsck on a mounted filesystem will do this unless you use background fsck, because the filesystem

Re: background_fsck=no does not work?

--On söndag, april 24, 2005 08.11.06 -0600 Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Palle Girgensohn wrote: Hi! on a 5.4-prerelease machine (dell 2850 dual cpu, running amd64), I have this in rc.conf: fsck_y_enable=YES background_fsck=NO Still, I'm not certain that fsck is really run at startup

Dell 2850 sporadically reboots (amd64)

Hi! We have a dual CPU Dell 2850 running fresh RELENG_5_4 (amd64). It reboots sporadically, a few times per day! It has a rather high load, running php, apache postfix. Is anyone else experiencing any problems with this kind of setup? diff against GENERIC kernel is minor: +# SMP +options

Re: how to remote update 4.10 - 5.3?

--On torsdag, december 30, 2004 20.36.56 +0300 Igor Pokrovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 04:38:23PM -0500, Paul Mather wrote: Palle Girgensohn wrote: I've tried the UPDATING instructions, both locally and remotely (the latter failed ;-). But really, everything has

how to remote update 4.10 - 5.3?

Hi! Has anyone managed to update a 4.10 system to 5.3 remotely, i.e. without console access, and without spare disk partitions? I have a bunch of 4.10 machines that are too far away for me to actually do the update hands on. I've tried it on a test machine, it fails half way through

Re: how to remote update 4.10 - 5.3?

--On onsdag, december 29, 2004 12.36.01 -0800 Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 09:30:37PM +0100, Palle Girgensohn wrote: Has anyone managed to update a 4.10 system to 5.3 remotely, i.e. without console access, and without spare disk partitions? I have a bunch

Re: how to remote update 4.10 - 5.3?

--On onsdag, december 29, 2004 13.01.10 -0800 Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 09:49:10PM +0100, Palle Girgensohn wrote: --On onsdag, december 29, 2004 12.36.01 -0800 Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 09:30:37PM +0100, Palle Girgensohn

Re: HEADS UP: databases/postgresql72 is dying

--On lördag, november 06, 2004 20.39.23 +0300 Dmitry Morozovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 6 Nov 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Sebastian B?ck wrote: SB Ade Lovett wrote: SB FYI. Prior to the postgresql new-world-order in ports/, I have now tagged SB databases/postgresql72 (current version 7.2.5)

Re:(2) best wireless (802.11g) NIC for -stable?

Well, I could consider upgrading if I can't find anything that works... /Palle --On fredag, mars 19, 2004 05.15.11 +0200 Evren Yurtesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: oh sorry, I dont think it works in stable, you need 5.x and atheros driver! Palle Girgensohn wrote: Hi, Any tips for a PCI 802.11g

best wireless (802.11g) NIC for -stable?

Hi, Any tips for a PCI 802.11g NIC (not pc-card, this is *not* a laptop, it's a regular tower machine). Preferably budget, but it must work in -stable. Also, warnings about disfunct ones are appreciated. Thanks, Palle ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing

Re: ATI Radeon 9600 SE OpenGL?

--On Wednesday, March 17, 2004 13:32:56 +0700 Eugene Grosbein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Palle Girgensohn wrote: Hi, Any way to get OpenGL working w/ an ATI Radeon SE? I use a fresh FreeBSD 4-STABLE with XFree86-4.3.99. The kernel does not probe anything, dmesg | egrep '(drm|agp|dri)' gives

Backporting S-ATA driver SiI 3112a to FreeBSD-STABLE?

Hi, I've received a bunch of ASUS A7N8X-E deluxe together with Serial ATA hard disks. I had planned to run 4.9 on this combo, but it seems the Serial ATA support for this driver does not exist before 5.x or so. The controller is a SiI 3112a from Silicon Image. Is there any chance of

ATA and UDMA

Hi! i read the thead a while back on udma. here's something pretty strange. I have two disk, each on a separate channel. Same controller (a rather old intel server board, running with one (out of two possible) pentium pro. The two disk are identical, bought together, and I use vinum with