n
CURRENT.
Anyway thanks for taking time to explain, this answers my questions.
--
Vlad K.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-
by omission, simply
ENOTIME, or something else...
--
Vlad K.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
?
--
Vlad K.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
I guess), or is there another reason?
Can we assume that in 11.1 the sysctl is integer and can we safely set
>1 number of pages, say 512 like the installer in CURRENT suggests?
Thanks!
--
Vlad K.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
ht
On Friday, February 24, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Ed Schouten wrote:
Hi Vlad,
* Vlad Galu d...@dudu.ro (mailto:d...@dudu.ro), 20120224 23:35:
Yes, sorry about that. I'm seeing stale (which sometimes turn into
duplicate) entries when I log off and on again. The symptom seems to
be exacerbated
On Friday, February 24, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Ed Schouten wrote:
Hi Vlad,
Has anyone else noticed erratic bookkeeping by utmpx in RELENG_9?
Would you mind explaining to me what you're seeing? It's hard for me to
fix bugs if I don't get proper reports.
--
Ed Schouten e...@80386.nl
On Friday, February 24, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Ed Schouten wrote:
Hello Vlad,
* Vlad Galu d...@dudu.ro (mailto:d...@dudu.ro), 20120224 23:54:
[1330014380.652067 -- Thu Feb 23 17:26:20 2012] user process:
id=4f86d023f250d3c9 pid=39012 user=dudu line=pts/0 host=A.B.C.D
[1330014398.177818
Hi,
Has anyone else noticed erratic bookkeeping by utmpx in RELENG_9?
Thanks,
Vlad
--
Good, fast cheap. Pick any two.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail
Hi Qing,
Any luck with this?
Thanks
Vlad
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Li, Qing qing...@bluecoat.com wrote:
This endless route lookup miss message problem is reproducible without
FLOWTABLE.
The problem is with the multiple FIBs. I cannot reproduce this problem in
my home network
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 1:32 AM, Li, Qing qing...@bluecoat.com wrote:
[...]
I'm seeing this as well. It's very easy to reproduce:
1. Start listening for routing messages on a non-default FIB, e.g.
setfib 2 route monitor
2. Add any static route within that FIB.
3. The machine I run the test on is
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Joshua Boyd boy...@jbip.net wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Had you loved so much to have this information, you would have given
me
Hi Joerg,
Flip security.bsd**.map_at_zero to 1.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Joerg Wunsch
freebsd-sta...@uriah.heep.sax.de wrote:
When trying to use doscmd on 8-stable, all I get is:
Error mapping HMA, HMA disabled: : Invalid argument
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
The segfault
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.comwrote:
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 07:22:10AM +0200, Vlad Galu wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 3:58 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
free...@jdc.parodius.comwrote:
(Please keep me CC'd as I'm not subscribed to freebsd-pf
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Vincent Hoffman vi...@unsane.co.uk wrote:
On 03/05/2011 10:16, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
snip lots of data relevant to the discussion but not my answer
Sadly I don't see a way with bsnmpd(8) to monitor things like interrupt
usage, etc. otherwise I'd be
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Vlad Galu d...@dudu.ro wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Vincent Hoffman vi...@unsane.co.ukwrote:
On 03/05/2011 10:16, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
snip lots of data relevant to the discussion but not my answer
Sadly I don't see a way with bsnmpd(8
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 3:58 AM, Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.comwrote:
(Please keep me CC'd as I'm not subscribed to freebsd-pf. And apologies
for cross-posting, but the issue is severe enough that I wanted to make
it known on -stable)
The below issue I'm describing is from a
2010/9/9 Marat N.Afanasyev ama...@ksu.ru:
I wonder, are these dynamic rules really necessary? let's see, a client
connects to your web-server and you immediately should create a new dynamic
rule, therefore you participate in this DoS attack as well as attacker. ;)
With a stateless firewall,
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net wrote:
[...]
FWIW, I've had a few crashes in if_rtdel() while playing with ECMP. No
Netgraph on that box. Unfortunately, the stack was too corrupted to be
able to see the outer frames.
--
Good, fast cheap. Pick any two.
/57722999 requests for mbufs denied (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters)
vmstat -i shows a rate of 1100 for the adapter.
The machine runs a fairly small PF configuration, but I've already
ruled it out, the symptoms appear when PF is disabled as well.
I'll happily provide more info.
Regards,
Vlad
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Konstantin Doulepov kdu...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Hello Konstantin,
Remove ZERO_COPY_SOCKETS and retry. It's been known to cause VM panics
for quite a while.
Regards,
Vlad
--
Good, fast cheap. Pick any two
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Daniel Braniss da...@cs.huji.ac.il wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting this with FreeBSD-8-stable, it usually happens when
starting apache:
alc@ made some VM MFCs yesterday, could you try a 13th of April kernel
and see if it works out for you?
--
Good, fast cheap. Pick
Luckily I could find this coredump:
-- cut here --
#0 doadump () at pcpu.h:223
#1 0x802f4ace in boot (howto=260) at ../../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:416
#2 0x802f4eab in panic (fmt=Variable fmt is not available.
) at ../../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:579
#3 0x805064d2 in
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Vlad Galu d...@dudu.ro wrote:
Luckily I could find this coredump:
-- cut here --
#0 doadump () at pcpu.h:223
#1 0x802f4ace in boot (howto=260) at
../../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:416
#2 0x802f4eab in panic (fmt=Variable fmt is not available
2009/10/21 Igor Sysoev i...@rambler-co.ru:
[...]
/metoo, 8.0-RC2
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
I've stumbled upon this while installing postgres. In
/etc/nsswitch.conf I had group: cache files compat and passwd:
cache files compat. Once I commented them out things started working
again. Before the change, this is how it looked like:
-- cut here --
[r...@vgalu
think the nicest way would be to signal EOF by
POLLHUP alone, without POLLIN.
Regards,
Vlad
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Ivan Vorasivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
On a completely unrelated subject I was reading about PHP APC cache
where they have the same need - cross-process locking with locks
embedded in data structures and they have adopted userland spinlock code
from PostgreSQL:
Hello,
Please take a look at the attached code. Shouldn't poll() get a
POLLHUP event when the child process exits, closing the write end of
the pipe?
Thanks,
Vlad
poll.cpp
Description: Binary data
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Hm, according to the code at
http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2001/06/poll.html, it seems to work as
expected (returning both POLLIN and POLLHUP), when closing the write
end of the pipe from within the same process.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Vlad Galu d...@dudu.ro wrote:
Hello,
Please
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 03:15:32PM +0300, Vlad Galu wrote:
Hello,
Please take a look at the attached code. Shouldn't poll() get a
POLLHUP event when the child process exits, closing the write end of
the pipe
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Vlad Galu d...@dudu.ro wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 03:15:32PM +0300, Vlad Galu wrote:
Hello,
Please take a look at the attached code. Shouldn't poll() get a
POLLHUP event when
it a named semaphore and only send its name over
the shared memory space.
Regards,
Vlad
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr
success, or should be
the man page get an update?
Thanks,
Vlad
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
What is the meaning of counts? Number of calls made or time?
The former.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
All in subject. I could see the particular line where install is
called on the newly built copy, but even though the system copy's file
flags are cleared (noschg), the overwriting fails. I managed to
overwrite it by (cp -f)-ing) the fresh copy over the old one.
Regards,
Vlad
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Dimitry Andric dimi...@andric.com wrote:
On 2009-05-15 18:42, Vlad GALU wrote:
All in subject. I could see the particular line where install is
called on the newly built copy, but even though the system copy's file
flags are cleared (noschg), the overwriting
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:37 PM, Dimitry Andric dimi...@andric.com wrote:
On 2009-05-15 22:25, Vlad GALU wrote:
called on the newly built copy, but even though the system copy's file
flags are cleared (noschg), the overwriting fails. I managed to
overwrite it by (cp -f)-ing) the fresh copy
=0x7038103c chip=0x164c14e4
rev=0x12 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation'
device = '5708C Broadcom NetXtreme II Gigabit Ethernet Adapter'
class = network
subclass = ethernet
-- and here --
Regards,
Vlad
--
~/.signature: no such file or directory
On 12/10/08, Mike Jakubik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, December 10, 2008 11:03 am, Jeff Blank wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 04:59:26PM +0200, Vlad GALU wrote:
I have an application pulling about 220Kpps from a bce(4) card
(details below). At what seems to be random times, errors
On 12/10/08, Vlad GALU [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/10/08, Mike Jakubik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, December 10, 2008 11:03 am, Jeff Blank wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 04:59:26PM +0200, Vlad GALU wrote:
I have an application pulling about 220Kpps from a bce(4) card
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 12:55 AM, Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the last episode (Dec 03), Vlad GALU said:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Am I doing something wrong? I've applied the full diff, rebuilt
truss, now I get this:
-- cut here
Hello,
I'm running a statically linked binary, which I've built inside a
jail. The jail's libc co are in sync with the host's.
Truss then shows this:
-- cut here --
-- UNKNOWN SYSCALL 1048532 --
-- UNKNOWN SYSCALL 1048532 --
-- UNKNOWN SYSCALL 1048524 --
-- UNKNOWN SYSCALL 1048516 --
-- UNKNOWN
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the last episode (Dec 03), Vlad GALU said:
I'm running a statically linked binary, which I've built inside a
jail. The jail's libc co are in sync with the host's. Truss then
shows this:
-- cut here --
-- UNKNOWN SYSCALL
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 7:08 PM, Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the last episode (Dec 03), Vlad GALU said:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the last episode (Dec 03), Vlad GALU said:
I'm running a statically linked binary, which I've built inside
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Am I doing something wrong? I've applied the full diff, rebuilt
truss, now I get this:
-- cut here --
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / # truss -p 52731
SIGNAL 17 (SIGSTOP)
-- UNKNOWN SYSCALL 1048535 --
-- UNKNOWN SYSCALL 1048496 --
to
UDP.
I've now fixed the bug leading to the lock order reversal; I'd be
interested in knowing if it also corrects the stability issue. This was
r183753 in svn; I'm not sure it's hit CVS/cvsup yet but should do in a few
minutes.
Dear Vlad:
Could you confirm that with udp_usrreq.c:1.218.2.7
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 03:40:26PM +0300, Vlad GALU wrote:
As my kernel had started to lock up periodically and I don't have
hands-on access to that machine, I enabled WITNESS.
So these started to pop up:
-- cut
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Mike Tancsa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 08:40 AM 10/10/2008, Vlad GALU wrote:
As my kernel had started to lock up periodically and I don't have
hands-on access to that machine, I enabled WITNESS.
So these started to pop up:
Is this with a stock kernel
As my kernel had started to lock up periodically and I don't have
hands-on access to that machine, I enabled WITNESS.
So these started to pop up:
-- cut here --
--- syscall (97, FreeBSD ELF64, socket), rip = 0x80070427c, rsp =
0x7fffe8c8, rbp = 0x516348 ---
uma_zalloc_arg: zone 16 with the
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 06:11:25PM +0300, Vlad GALU wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Mike Tancsa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 08:40 AM 10/10/2008, Vlad GALU wrote:
As my kernel had started to lock up
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 20 Sep 2008, Vlad GALU wrote:
Will the zero-copy bpf(4) changes be merged to the stable branch before
the release?
Dear Vlad:
Unfortunately, no. The code seems stable in 8-CURRENT, but I don't feel
it's had
Hi,
Will the zero-copy bpf(4) changes be merged to the stable branch
before the release?
Thanks,
Vlad
--
~/.signature: no such file or directory
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
On 7/30/08, David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 29 July 2008 08:45:45 Ken Smith wrote:
Normally the FreeBSD Project tries very hard to avoid ABI breakage in
Stable Branches. However occasionally the fix for a bug can not be
implemented without ABI breakage, and it is
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Volodymyr Kostyrko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Got a coredump each time when playing FLAC files through xmms2 with
pulseaudio output plugin.
cairn# kgdb /boot/kernel.old/kernel vmcore.9
[GDB will not be able to debug user-mode threads:
Now that the 6.3 release notes advertise its reimplementation,
isn't it safe to remove the warning at the end of the mount_unionfs(8)
?
--
Mahnahmahnah!
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
On 1/21/08, Ivan Voras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Before I try to reinvent the wheel, I'd like to hear are there commonly
used utilities that process syslog logs (e.g. /var/log/messages), grep
them for some regex and notify configured e-mail addresses, in real time
(as messages arrive)? I
On 1/21/08, Ivan Voras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vlad GALU wrote:
On 1/21/08, Ivan Voras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Before I try to reinvent the wheel, I'd like to hear are there commonly
used utilities that process syslog logs (e.g. /var/log/messages), grep
them for some regex
-- cut here --
(gdb) attach 58621
Attaching to process 58621
/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/gdb/libgdb/../../../../contrib/gdb/gdb/solib-svr4.c:1443:
internal-error: legacy_fetch_link_map_offsets called without legacy
link_map support enabled.
A problem internal to GDB has been detected,
further debugging
On 1/19/08, Vlad GALU [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. I noticed the WITHOUT_SSP switch in src.conf(5). Does this mean
that Propolice is currently used by default?
2. For debugging purposes, I'd like to rebuild my whole world with
debugging symbols. Adding -g to the flags in make.conf seemed
1. I noticed the WITHOUT_SSP switch in src.conf(5). Does this mean
that Propolice is currently used by default?
2. For debugging purposes, I'd like to rebuild my whole world with
debugging symbols. Adding -g to the flags in make.conf seemed to do
the trink until right before the installation
On 1/17/08, Ferdinand Goldmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I am in the process of buying new Dell hardware, mainly the 2950 III.
According to various postings I found, the PERC6/i Controller _should_ work
with FreeBSD 6.3. Does anyone successfully use a 2950 III with PERC6/i
controller and
On 1/8/08, Richard Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for the repost...
I don't think the first one posted..
posted to freebsd.stable, freebsd-current, Freebsd-hardware
I checked the hardware in the online documentation manual/hardware
It only lists the bits and peices of the machine say
On 11/13/07, Vivek Khera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got a Dell 1750 box that was rock-solid stable running 4.11 for a
couple of years now operating a pretty busy website backend. A month
or so ago we wiped it clean and repurposed it to run a different
website running Drupal with a Varnish
On 11/13/07, Vivek Khera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 13, 2007, at 4:50 PM, Vlad GALU wrote:
vmio = 1
offset = Unhandled dwarf expression opcode 0x93
(kgdb)
Do you happen to have ZERO_COPY_SOCKETS in your kernel config?
Yes, I do. Are they known to be bad
On 11/11/07, Christian S.J. Peron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 08:11:57PM +0200, Dan Epure wrote:
I just used the patch and it is working.
Good to hear. I have submitted the request to get this merged to
RELENG_7. Thanks for the quick response.
Unfortunately, this
On 11/12/07, Christian S.J. Peron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 10:17:31PM +0200, Vlad GALU wrote:
On 11/11/07, Christian S.J. Peron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 08:11:57PM +0200, Dan Epure wrote:
I just used the patch and it is working
On 11/12/07, Christian S.J. Peron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 01:14:14AM +0200, Vlad GALU wrote:
[..]
This one:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2007-November/038054.html
Thanks!
Ah.. ok. At first glance this doesn't look like a problem
On 11/7/07, Tom Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 22:19 +0200, Dan Epure wrote:
Hi All,
I'm using on the host system (7.0-BETA2):
#sysctl kern.pts.enable
kern.pts.enable: 1
I have no problem at all.
The jail is also 7.0-BETA2
The problem is inside the jail
On 10/18/07, Philipp Ost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list,
I'm currently upgrading from 6.2-STABLE (13 Oct. 2007) to RELENG_7. I
did the following after csup'ing my sources:
# make kernel-toolchain
# make -DALWAYS_CHECK_MAKE buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL
# make -DALWAYS_CHECK_MAKE
On 10/4/07, Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-10-02 15:41, Vlad GALU [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/2/07, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vlad GALU [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The symptoms were exhibited even with rev. 1.16. I've CC'ed him so
he can catch
On 10/2/07, Dag-Erling Smørgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vlad GALU [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dag-Erling Smørgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alternatively, set kern.pts.enable to 1, and find and fix the
hang-on-close bug in the pts code (if it hasn't been fixed already)
Looks like
On 10/2/07, Vlad GALU [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/2/07, Dag-Erling Smørgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vlad GALU [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dag-Erling Smørgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alternatively, set kern.pts.enable to 1, and find and fix the
hang-on-close bug in the pts code
On 10/2/07, Dag-Erling Smørgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steven Hartland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any one got any pointers on this, the machine we running this app on is over
90% idle so I really don't want to have to install a second machine just to
workaround a limit on the number of
On 10/2/07, Dag-Erling Smørgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vlad GALU [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The symptoms were exhibited even with rev. 1.16. I've CC'ed him so
he can catch up with the thread.
Which symptoms? I can no longer reproduce the hang-on-close bug.
Strangely enough, me neither
On 10/2/07, Vlad GALU [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/2/07, Dag-Erling Smørgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vlad GALU [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The symptoms were exhibited even with rev. 1.16. I've CC'ed him so
he can catch up with the thread.
Which symptoms? I can no longer reproduce
On 10/2/07, Dag-Erling Smørgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vlad GALU [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dag-Erling Smørgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Vlad GALU [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The symptoms were exhibited even with rev. 1.16. I've CC'ed him so
he can catch up with the thread.
Which
On 4/19/07, Anton - Valqk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Guys,
Is there any way to have mount_nullfs working inside the jail?
I mount nullfs from the host, that's how I share the ports
directory across jails.
Please gime me any idea on that topic.
Thank you.
--
This message has been
On 3/14/07, Emile Coetzee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since the latest updates to sys/net/if_tap.c (I suspect) in 6.2-STABLE
my openvpn tap server is using up all available CPU time (99%)
effectively killing the box.
I replicated this on a second machine which was about 3 weeks behind
with a cvsup
On 2/12/07, Jeffrey Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone tried loading the java 1.5 diablo binaries from the freebsd
foundation on 6.2 yet?
Yes, and it works OK. I also happen to run the java/jdk15 port and
it runs just as smoothly. You can ask the port maintainer about the
On 1/24/07, Gustavo Feijó [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I know it's not the right list to write to, but I'll still try a shot.
There is freebsd-isp@, as well :)
I'm running sendmail in my FreeBSD box and wish to block mails comming
from domains with no ptr configs.
Am I missing
On 1/8/07, Cristian Fatu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello to all !
I want to disable keyboard port ... can somebody help me ?
hint.atkbdc.0.disable=1 or hint.atkbd.0.disable=1 in /boot/device.hints.
Thanks!
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
On 12/12/06, Divacky Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi
can anyone confirm that he has working tunnel over if_tun
device on 6.2 and amd64?
Yes, I have OpenVPN using tun(4) running smoothly on a machine
running RELENG_6 on amd64.
I cannot get it work (using vtund). The configuration
is
On 11/1/06, Vlad Galu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/31/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 04:34:59PM +0200, Vlad Galu wrote:
Yes, but for objective reasons I can't publish it :(
The only
debugging option that I didn't use was INVARIANTS.
Which
-- cut here --
lock order reversal:
1st 0x80501ba0 cdev (cdev) @ kern/kern_conf.c:61
2nd 0x858d20f8 sleep mtxpool (sleep mtxpool) @ kern/kern_prot.c:1877
KDB: stack backtrace:
witness_checkorder() at witness_checkorder+0x4d2
_mtx_lock_flags() at _mtx_lock_flags+0x5c
crhold() at
On 11/9/06, Vlad Galu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- cut here --
lock order reversal:
1st 0x80501ba0 cdev (cdev) @ kern/kern_conf.c:61
2nd 0x858d20f8 sleep mtxpool (sleep mtxpool) @ kern/kern_prot.c:1877
KDB: stack backtrace:
witness_checkorder() at witness_checkorder+0x4d2
On 11/9/06, Vlad Galu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/9/06, Vlad Galu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- cut here --
lock order reversal:
1st 0x80501ba0 cdev (cdev) @ kern/kern_conf.c:61
2nd 0x858d20f8 sleep mtxpool (sleep mtxpool) @ kern/kern_prot.c:1877
KDB: stack backtrace
On 11/5/06, Rong-en Fan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I get these too.
--
If it's there, and you can see it, it's real.
If it's not there, and you can see it, it's virtual.
If it's there, and you can't see it, it's transparent.
If it's not there, and you can't see it, you erased it.
On 10/31/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It now crashes in a different place. Unfortunately I don't have
physical access to the machine. A bt full is available at
http://night.rdslink.ro/dudu/freebsd/03_11_2006.txt. The stack was
corrupted though :(
--
If it's there, and you can
On 10/1/06, Cy Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Vlad
GALU writes:
On 9/30/06, Martin Blapp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
1.) Bad ram ? Have you run some memory tester ?
Yes, memtest86 didn't show anything weird.
2.) Have you background fsck running
On 10/31/06, Eric Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/31/06 08:03, Vlad Galu wrote:
On 10/1/06, Cy Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Vlad
GALU writes:
On 9/30/06, Martin Blapp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
1.) Bad ram ? Have you run some memory tester
On 10/31/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 04:34:59PM +0200, Vlad Galu wrote:
Yes, but for objective reasons I can't publish it :(
The only
debugging option that I didn't use was INVARIANTS.
Which is coincidentally the most useful one ;-)
Also turn
On 10/12/06, Dan Lukes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Danial Thom wrote:
The right thing to do is to port the SATA support
and new NIC support back to 4.x and support both.
4.x is far superior on a Uniprocessor system and
FreeBSD-5+ may be an entire re-write away from
ever being any good at MP.
Judging from my tests (allocating numerous small objects, then
freeing the memory) it looks like the bottleneck is in free(). I've
built a different libc library with the malloc.c and tree.h taken from
HEAD and it now behaves nicely. I haven't seen any bad side effects on
this machine (it's
I've been getting random crashes like the one below, once or twice a
week, always in the same code path. The system is a RELENG_6 as of Wed
Sep 27 11:42:57 EEST 2006, running on amd64.
-- cut here --
#0 doadump () at pcpu.h:172
No locals.
#1 0x8022d033 in boot (howto=260) at
--
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006, Vlad GALU wrote:
I've been getting random crashes like the one below, once or twice a
week, always in the same code path. The system is a RELENG_6 as of Wed
Sep 27 11:42:57 EEST 2006, running on amd64.
-- cut here --
#0 doadump
to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad4s1a
WARNING: / was not properly dismounted
/: mount pending error: blocks 216 files 1
sis0: Applying short cable fix (reg=f8)
rl0: link state changed to UP
--
Vlad
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/16/06, Vlad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I get this type of messages in on my FreeBSD.
ad4: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=70938623
Under steady IO load it panics, that started when we changed SATA
controller (FreeBSD detects it as SiI 3512). I've tried
On 8/7/06, Andrew Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yet another M-Audio (Audiophile 192) + 4Front + FreeBSD happy user :)
--
If it's there, and you can see it, it's real.
If it's not there, and you can see it, it's virtual.
If it's there, and you can't see it, it's transparent.
If it's not there,
On 7/12/06, Bartosz Fabianowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since the iwi driver has been MFC'd, I cannot build a kernel any more. I
csupped my src/sys to RELENG_6 a couple of hours ago. Everything
compiles fine, but when linking the kernel, make barfs:
linking kernel
if_iwi.o(.text+0x29c4): In
Is the iwi driver going to be synced with rev. 1.3x of HEAD? I'm
using 1.36 along with a RELENG_6 tree, since it works better (read: it
works). From the HEAD commit messages I understand that some MFCs
would've been in order by now. Are there any show-stoppers that push
that schedule ahead ?
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo