Re: 10-STABLE hangups frequently

Hello, Le dim 7 fév 16 à 2:23:34 +0100, Kirk McKusick écrivait : > Please let me know if you are able to come up with an example that > shows the problem as that would give me something with which to > try to track down the problem. The problem is described in PR

Re: 10-STABLE hangups frequently

On 19/02/2016 15:36, Shane Ambler wrote: On 18/02/2016 10:54, Marius Strobl wrote: Could those of you experiencing these hangs with ZFS please test whether instead of reverting all of r292895, a kernel built with just the merge of r291244 undone via the following patch gets rid of that problem

Re: 10-STABLE hangups frequently

On 18/02/2016 10:54, Marius Strobl wrote: Could those of you experiencing these hangs with ZFS please test whether instead of reverting all of r292895, a kernel built with just the merge of r291244 undone via the following patch gets rid of that problem - especially on amd64 - and report back?

Re: 10-STABLE hangups frequently

Hi, > On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:24:03 +0100 > Marius Strobl said: marius> Could those of you experiencing these hangs with ZFS please test marius> whether instead of reverting all of r292895, a kernel built with marius> just the merge of r291244 undone via the following

Re: 10-STABLE hangups frequently

> On 18 Feb 2016, at 01:24, Marius Strobl wrote: > > > Could those of you experiencing these hangs with ZFS please test > whether instead of reverting all of r292895, a kernel built with > just the merge of r291244 undone via the following patch gets > rid of that problem -

Re: 10-STABLE hangups frequently

On 02/18/2016 01:24, Marius Strobl wrote: > > Could those of you experiencing these hangs with ZFS please test > whether instead of reverting all of r292895, a kernel built with > just the merge of r291244 undone via the following patch gets rid > of that problem - especially on amd64 - and

Re: 10-STABLE hangups frequently

Could those of you experiencing these hangs with ZFS please test whether instead of reverting all of r292895, a kernel built with just the merge of r291244 undone via the following patch gets rid of that problem - especially on amd64 - and report back?

Re: 10-STABLE hangups frequently

On 02/07/16 16:24, Henri Hennebert wrote: On 02/03/2016 02:03, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: Hi, On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 07:07:38 +1100 Peter Jeremy said: peter> As others have said, you need to provide lots more detail on your peter> configuration. CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor

Re: 10-STABLE hangups frequently

On 02/03/2016 02:03, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > Hi, > >> On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 07:07:38 +1100 >> Peter Jeremy said: > > peter> As others have said, you need to provide lots more detail on your > peter> configuration. > > CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3500+ > Memory:

Re: 10-STABLE hangups frequently

> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 19:39:14 +0100 > From: Thierry Thomas <thie...@freebsd.org> > To: Hajimu UMEMOTO <u...@mahoroba.org> > Cc: sta...@freebsd.org, mckus...@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: 10-STABLE hangups frequently > >> Hi, > > Hello, > >>

Re: 10-STABLE hangups frequently

Hi, > On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 14:52:37 +0200 > Konstantin Belousov said: kostikbel> Please gather the information listed at kostikbel> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug-deadlocks.html I tried the instruction. But, the

Re: 10-STABLE hangups frequently

On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 11:40:50PM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > Hi, > > > On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 14:52:37 +0200 > > Konstantin Belousov said: > > kostikbel> Please gather the information listed at > kostikbel> >

Re: 10-STABLE hangups frequently

On 2016-Feb-04 11:45:56 +1030, Shane Ambler wrote: >Going by figures shown in top, ARC is usually in the 1500M to 2000M >range but when wired gets over 6GB I often see ARC drop to 500MB which >I now realise matches arc_min. That's definitely abnormal. You might like to

Re: 10-STABLE hangups frequently

On 2016-Feb-02 14:52:37 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >Please gather the information listed at >https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug-deadlocks.html Interestingly, as soon as I enable INVARIANTS, my kernel will no longer boot.

Re: 10-STABLE hangups frequently

Le mer 3 fév 16 à 17:55:03 +0100, Karl Denninger écrivait : > (Whistling.) > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187594 > > (see if that helps you) Thanks, I'll check it! -- Th. Thomas. ___

Re: 10-STABLE hangups frequently

On 04/02/2016 05:33, Peter Jeremy wrote: On 2016-Feb-03 18:23:13 +1030, Shane Ambler wrote: Any chance you get high wired allocations? A high wired allocation is normal for ZFS - ARC shows up as "wired" memory. Sometimes several times in a day I see the wired amount

Re: 10-STABLE hangups frequently

Le mer 3 fév 16 à 8:53:13 +0100, Shane Ambler écrivait : > Any chance you get high wired allocations? > > Sometimes several times in a day I see the wired amount shown in top > rise to over 6GB (of 8GB) bringing the system to a crawl. When wired > gets over 7GB the

Re: 10-STABLE hangups frequently

(Whistling.) https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187594 (see if that helps you) On 2/3/2016 10:47, Thierry Thomas wrote: > Le mer 3 fév 16 à 8:53:13 +0100, Shane Ambler > écrivait : > >> Any chance you get high wired allocations? >> >> Sometimes

Re: 10-STABLE hangups frequently

On 2016-Feb-03 18:23:13 +1030, Shane Ambler wrote: >Any chance you get high wired allocations? A high wired allocation is normal for ZFS - ARC shows up as "wired" memory. >Sometimes several times in a day I see the wired amount shown in top >rise to over 6GB (of 8GB)

Re: 10-STABLE hangups frequently

On 2016-Feb-02 16:55:46 +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: >I'm disturbed by a frequent hangup of my 10-STABLE boxes since this >year. It seems occur during running the periodic daily scripts. >I've narrowed which commit causes this problem. It seems r292895 >causes it. I see many

Re: 10-STABLE hangups frequently

Le mar 2 fév 16 à 8:55:46 +0100, Hajimu UMEMOTO écrivait : > Hi, Hello, > I'm disturbed by a frequent hangup of my 10-STABLE boxes since this > year. It seems occur during running the periodic daily scripts. > I've narrowed which commit causes this problem. It seems

Re: 10-STABLE hangups frequently

Hi, > On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 07:07:38 +1100 > Peter Jeremy said: peter> As others have said, you need to provide lots more detail on your peter> configuration. CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3500+ Memory: 4GB HDD: 3TB I'm using ZFS only setup. peter> There were no

Re: 10-STABLE hangups frequently

On 03/02/2016 05:09, Thierry Thomas wrote: Le mar 2 fév 16 à 8:55:46 +0100, Hajimu UMEMOTO écrivait : Hi, Hello, I'm disturbed by a frequent hangup of my 10-STABLE boxes since this year. It seems occur during running the periodic daily scripts. I've narrowed which

Re: 10-STABLE hangups frequently

Some more information about your enviroment would be helpful: 1. What revision of stable/10 are you running? 2. What workloads are you running? 3. What's the output of procstat -k -k when this happens (assuming its possible to run)? 4. What's the output of sysctl -a |grep vnode, usually and when

Re: 10-STABLE hangups frequently

Hi, > On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 08:54:17 + > Steven Hartland said: killing> Some more information about your enviroment would be helpful: killing> 1. What revision of stable/10 are you running? It occurs on r292895 and later. killing> 2. What workloads are you

Re: 10-STABLE hangups frequently

Just want to chip in that I also experience the same issue. This is my home firewall running squid/unbound/isc-bind/isc-dhcpd/pf/zfs. Have a couple of tmpfs and NFSv4 mounts. Was about to order new hardware since I thought it might be failing, lol. Haven't had time to hook up a monitor/console,

Re: 10-STABLE hangups frequently

On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 06:28:58PM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > Hi, > > > On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 08:54:17 + > > Steven Hartland said: > > killing> Some more information about your enviroment would be helpful: > killing> 1. What revision of stable/10 are you

Re: 10-STABLE hangups frequently

On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 02:33:27PM +0100, Henrik Lidstr??m wrote: > Just want to chip in that I also experience the same issue. This is my The same ? So did you diagnosed the problem and can explain, from the evidence provided by you and Hajimu, what is the cause and why the issues are the same

10-STABLE hangups frequently

Hi, I'm disturbed by a frequent hangup of my 10-STABLE boxes since this year. It seems occur during running the periodic daily scripts. I've narrowed which commit causes this problem. It seems r292895 causes it. I see many `Resource temporarily unavailable' message just before hangup occurs.