> vm.kmem_size=1500M
> vm.kmem_size_max=2G
i am trying this with some success. let's see how the day goes.
> BTW: I use auto-tuning of the ARC cache size:
> vfs.zfs.arc_min: 12288
> vfs.zfs.arc_max: 98304
how the hell is a sysadmin supposed to guess all this ? if the
freebsd sysadmin n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Randy Bush wrote:
>
> imiho, zfs can not be called production ready if it crashes if you do
> not stand on your left leg, put your right hand in the air, and burn
> some eye of newt.
That just about sums up my impression. Nine out of ten for porting
Randy Bush wrote:
> imiho, zfs can not be called production ready if it crashes if you
> do not stand on your left leg, put your right hand in the air, and
> burn some eye of newt.
ROFL!
As with any open-source project, I suppose it will be ready
when it is ready. At least it hasn't been made t
Randy Bush wrote:
> imiho, zfs can not be called production ready if it crashes if you
> do not stand on your left leg, put your right hand in the air, and
> burn some eye of newt.
This is not a rant, but where do you read that on FreeBSD 7.2 ZFS has
been marked as production ready.
As far as i k
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 08:07:40PM +0100, Johan Hendriks wrote:
> Randy Bush wrote:
> > imiho, zfs can not be called production ready if it crashes if you
> > do not stand on your left leg, put your right hand in the air, and
> > burn some eye of newt.
>
> This is not a rant, but where do you re
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 08:07:40PM +0100, Johan Hendriks wrote:
>> Randy Bush wrote:
>> > imiho, zfs can not be called production ready if it crashes if you
>> > do not stand on your left leg, put your right hand in the air, and
>> > bur
On 2009-Nov-21 09:47:56 +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
>imiho, zfs can not be called production ready if it crashes if you do
>not stand on your left leg, put your right hand in the air, and burn
>some eye of newt.
FWIW, it's still very brittle on Solaris 10 and the Sun Support
response to most issues
>> imiho, zfs can not be called production ready if it crashes if you
>> do not stand on your left leg, put your right hand in the air, and
>> burn some eye of newt.
> ROFL!
> As with any open-source project, I suppose it will be ready
> when it is ready. At least it hasn't been made the default.
>> imiho, zfs can not be called production ready if it crashes if you
>> do not stand on your left leg, put your right hand in the air, and
>> burn some eye of newt.
> This is not a rant, but where do you read that on FreeBSD 7.2 ZFS has
> been marked as production ready.
> As far as i know, on Fre
2009/11/21 Peter Jeremy :
> On 2009-Nov-21 09:47:56 +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
>>imiho, zfs can not be called production ready if it crashes if you do
>>not stand on your left leg, put your right hand in the air, and burn
>>some eye of newt.
>
> FWIW, it's still very brittle on Solaris 10 and the Su
> My understanding is that the problem is more that the FreeBSD VM
> system doesn't gracefully handle running low or out of memory.
to me, that's just life in the big city. the problem i think can be
solved before this is let loose on the unsuspecting public is that there
are really no good tools
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 01:59:11PM -0600, Scot Hetzel wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 08:07:40PM +0100, Johan Hendriks wrote:
> >> Randy Bush wrote:
> >> > imiho, zfs can not be called production ready if it crashes if you
> >> >
> Everyone's workloads are different, but the panic is the same every
> time: kmem exhaustion. i386 with KVA_PAGES or amd64 -- happens on both.
> It's highly dependent upon workload and what the filesystem consists of
> (many files vs. fewer files but larger in size, etc.)
these are measurable.
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 06:16:04PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
> >> imiho, zfs can not be called production ready if it crashes if you
> >> do not stand on your left leg, put your right hand in the air, and
> >> burn some eye of newt.
> > ROFL!
> > As with any open-source project, I suppose it will be
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 04:29:26PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 01:59:11PM -0600, Scot Hetzel wrote:
> > > RELENG_7 and RELENG_8 both, more or less, behave the same way with
> > > regards to ZFS. Both panic on kmem exhaustion. No one has answered my
> > > question as fa
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 11:36:43AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 08:07:40PM +0100, Johan Hendriks wrote:
> Randy Bush wrote:
> > imiho, zfs can not be called production ready if it crashes if you
> > do not stand on your left leg, put your right hand in the air,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam McDougall wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 11:36:43AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 08:07:40PM +0100, Johan Hendriks wrote:
> > Randy Bush wrote:
> > > imiho, zfs can not be called production ready if it cr
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 10:00:03AM +0100, Svein Skogen (listmail account) wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam McDougall wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 11:36:43AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 08:07:40PM +0100, Johan Hendr
On Nov 22, 2009, at 12:34 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>> Try running FreeBSD 7-Stable to get the latest ZFS version which on
>> FreeBSD is 13
>
> that is what i am running. RELENG_7
I've been following ZFS on FreeBSD long ago, and it really seems to be stable
on 8.0/amd64.
Even Sun Microsystems s
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:41:43AM +0100, Borja Marcos wrote:
> On Nov 22, 2009, at 12:34 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
> >
> >> Try running FreeBSD 7-Stable to get the latest ZFS version which on
> >> FreeBSD is 13
> >
> > that is what i am running. RELENG_7
>
> I've been following ZFS on FreeBSD long
On Nov 23, 2009, at 10:01 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:41:43AM +0100, Borja Marcos wrote:
>> On Nov 22, 2009, at 12:34 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>>>
Try running FreeBSD 7-Stable to get the latest ZFS version which on
FreeBSD is 13
>>>
>>> that is what i am runni
21 matches
Mail list logo
