Compiler Problems?

2007-09-15 Thread Thomas D. Dean
I believe we have a compiler problem with gcc42. I had a problem with scilab under both -stable and -current. I installed the ports with the default make files. scilab failed at run time. ports/116378. Math/scilab uses math/lapack and math/blas and builds everything with gcc42 and gfortran42.

Re: Compiler problems with -O2 (was Re: CVS Trouble, even under4.0-RELEASE (alpha) HELP!)

2000-03-23 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Charles Cox wrote: I would like to add that some of us who do a lot of numerically intensive programming, and that need to squeeze every last available cycle out of our CPU's would really appreciate having -O2 available for userland programs. To me, getting rid of the -O2+ switch would be

Re: Compiler problems with -O2 (was Re: CVS Trouble, even under 4.0-RELEASE(alpha) HELP!)

2000-03-22 Thread Howard Leadmon
Actually I have several Alpha's, and one I have to reload due to this, so I will give this a try on the other machine and will let you know if I have good success with it. If this all works, then I agree with you that we want to avoid, or at least note the problem with -O2 as I have been using

Re: Compiler problems with -O2 (was Re: CVS Trouble, even under 4.0-RELEASE (alpha) HELP!)

2000-03-22 Thread Chad R. Larson
I'm sorry, at best here we're talking a few tenths of a percentage point of increased speed (if that), and maybe a few milliseconds saved -- right? Actually the difference between -O and -O2 the times i've looked at the generated code was substantial, but I guess that brings along