Hi,
Xorg is working fine now. Thanks.
Eitarou
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 03:12, Ceri Davies wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 04:41:14PM +0900, Eitarou Kamo wrote:
I got an io error
"xf86EnableIO: Fatal to open /dev/io for
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 04:41:14PM +0900, Eitarou Kamo wrote:
I got an io error
xf86EnableIO: Fatal to open /dev/io for extended I/O
when running Xorg -configure.
Has this snapshot been fixed this problem?
Do you have a /dev/io?
Do you have device io in your kernel configuration?
Ceri
--
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 03:12, Ceri Davies wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 04:41:14PM +0900, Eitarou Kamo wrote:
I got an io error
xf86EnableIO: Fatal to open /dev/io for extended I/O
when running Xorg -configure.
Has this snapshot been fixed this problem?
Do you have a /dev/io?
Do you
Michael Nottebrock wrote:
On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 07:28, Nate Lawson wrote:
Are there any tags for these? That may be too heavyweight but at least
publishing the exact UTC date for the build would be good. That would
help us track down in bug reports what code the user has, especially
Nate Lawson wrote:
Michael Nottebrock wrote:
On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 07:28, Nate Lawson wrote:
Are there any tags for these? That may be too heavyweight but at least
publishing the exact UTC date for the build would be good. That would
help us track down in bug reports what code the user
On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 17:29, Nate Lawson wrote:
Michael Nottebrock wrote:
On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 07:28, Nate Lawson wrote:
Are there any tags for these? That may be too heavyweight but at least
publishing the exact UTC date for the build would be good. That would
help us
On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 17:41, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 17:29, Nate Lawson wrote:
Michael Nottebrock wrote:
On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 07:28, Nate Lawson wrote:
Are there any tags for these? That may be too heavyweight but at least
publishing the
Michael Nottebrock wrote:
On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 17:41, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 17:29, Nate Lawson wrote:
Michael Nottebrock wrote:
On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 07:28, Nate Lawson wrote:
Are there any tags for these? That may be too heavyweight but at least
I'm talking hour/min./second, thanks.
What it sounds like you really want is the CVS revision ID for every
file in the snapshot so that when someone reports a bug that you think
you might have fixed already, you can just point them to the correct
revision. Haven't you learned that
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 08:29:13AM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
The snapshots on snapshots.[jp|se].freebsd.org are date-suffixed (however,
those servers don't build snaps for all platforms).
I'm talking hour/min./second, thanks.
Both checkout code as of 00:00:00 GMT on the date the snapshot
I got an io error
xf86EnableIO: Fatal to open /dev/io for extended I/O
when running Xorg -configure.
Has this snapshot been fixed this problem?
Eitarou
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
All,
The Release Engineering Team is happy to announce that snapshots for \
FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE and 6.0-CURRENT are now available for download. This
release is the first in a series of monthly snapshots of the active
branches of the FreeBSD tree. Each snapshot consists of a 'mini-inst'
(install
Scott Long wrote:
All,
The Release Engineering Team is happy to announce that snapshots for \
FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE and 6.0-CURRENT are now available for download. This
release is the first in a series of monthly snapshots of the active
branches of the FreeBSD tree. Each snapshot consists of a
Nate Lawson wrote:
Scott Long wrote:
All,
The Release Engineering Team is happy to announce that snapshots for \
FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE and 6.0-CURRENT are now available for download. This
release is the first in a series of monthly snapshots of the active
branches of the FreeBSD tree. Each snapshot
14 matches
Mail list logo
