/include/npx.h
+ NOTES content.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5769493.html
Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5769298.html
Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To uns
#xfree86-root There is no Xwrapper (x11/wrapper) in ports tree. (Port is
expired, whole
answer outdated.)
#xconsole-failure Indeed xconsole throws such error, but not xterm -C.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5769225.html
#uninstall-kerberos
Uh? Reinstalling base will delete kerberos? I don't get this answer.
I thought kerberos was part of base?
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5769224.html
Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archi
I think HAST (hastd) is faq-worthy, as since release
9, it covers area previously vocally missed by some.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5768880.html
Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com
.cgusc.c sb.h sbc.c
Sorry.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5768186.html
Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-stable
On Sun, 9 Dec 2012 08:03:03 -0800, Jakub Lach wrote:
> Probably already axed, it was supported by
> dev/sound/isa/mss.c and isa/snd/ad1848.c I think.
Add text and items enhancing knowledge for later and latest kit, by all
means, but - just speaking generally - "Careful with that axe, Eugene!"
Ok, but it doesn't change current primary reason of silent devices
(wrong pinout) :)
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5768088.html
Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabbl
On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 07:47:01AM -0800, Jakub Lach wrote:
> #sound-card-support
>
> First part is fine, assuming man pages will be up to date etc. Not sure
> about
> support for MIDI cards/MPU-401. Is this covered by uart? Don't know whatever
> was "Microsoft® Sound System specification".
>
>
AdLib ROX! :-)
http://www.datasheetarchive.com/indexer.php?file=DSA00355987.pdf&dir=Datasheet-020&keywords=AD1848%2F1846&database=user-highscore#
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Analog-Devices-AD1848KP-ISA-SoundPort-Opti-82C29A-/200846434225?pt=US_Sound_Cards_Internal_&hash=item2ec3615fb1
At computer de
Closest now would be ancient snd_ad1816, maybe it could be
usable with it but it's pure speculation, good luck with finding
hardware and testing that :)
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5767810.html
Sent from the fr
ted by
dev/sound/isa/mss.c and isa/snd/ad1848.c I think.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5767809.html
Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-stable
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5767808.html
Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailma
On 7 December 2012 16:11, Bas Smeelen wrote:
> On 12/07/12 21:36, Jakub Lach wrote:
>>
>> While it's very, very minute detail, I think that in #officesuite
>> there should be "Apache OpenOffice" not "Apache Open Office"
>> as they were very careful even bureaucratic [*] if I reckon correctly,
>> w
On 12/07/12 21:36, Jakub Lach wrote:
While it's very, very minute detail, I think that in #officesuite
there should be "Apache OpenOffice" not "Apache Open Office"
as they were very careful even bureaucratic [*] if I reckon correctly,
when choosing new branding.
[*] They have "branding initiativ
idelines" and held vote-
https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/openoffice_org_is_now_apache
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5767462.html
Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
astie are all fine.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5765495.html
Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
If it is really mandatory on i386, why there is option at all?
According to man, while apic is mandatory on amd64 there
is no corresponding config or NOTES entry.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5764584.html
Sent from the
On 11/27/2012 08:44 AM, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
On 11/26/12 23:09, Bas Smeelen wrote:
Probable addition
8.8 I get a lot of 'spurious interrupts detected' messages on a modified
i386 build kernel and my computer does not work right. What did I do wrong?
You have a single processor computer, bui
On 11/26/12 23:09, Bas Smeelen wrote:
Probable addition
8.8 I get a lot of 'spurious interrupts detected' messages on a modified
i386 build kernel and my computer does not work right. What did I do wrong?
You have a single processor computer, build your own customized kernel
and disabled
option
On 11/20/12 20:25, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 19 November 2012 15:07, Aldis Berjoza wrote:
19.11.2012, 22:04, "Andrea Venturoli" :
On 11/19/12 18:44, Eitan Adler wrote:
Hey all,
The FAQ for FreeBSD needs a significant amount of updating and
changing. The first step in that process is to
On 11/26/12 22:27, Schaich Alonso wrote:
On 2012-11-26 (Monday) 22:15:27 Miroslav Lachman wrote:
[...]
So a kernel alone has 12MB, with debug symbols 62MB (12+50).
And all *.symbols files can be deleted (if more space on /boot is needed)
I don't know how it should be mentioned in FAQ.
Miroslav
On 2012-11-26 (Monday) 22:15:27 Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> [...]
>
> So a kernel alone has 12MB, with debug symbols 62MB (12+50).
> And all *.symbols files can be deleted (if more space on /boot is needed)
> I don't know how it should be mentioned in FAQ.
>
> Miroslav Lachman
Specifying WITHOUT_K
On 11/26/12 22:20, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/26/12 22:02, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 26 November 2012, at 12:53, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/26/12 21:27, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/26/12 17:25, Jakub Lach wrote:
Thanks!
Regarding FAQ, some info about journalling should be added to
"Chapter 9 Disks, F
On 11/26/12 22:15, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/26/12 16:57, Jakub Lach wrote:
[...]
Thanks Miroslav Lachman for the reply with the correct sizes for GENERIC
kernels.
Change FAQ 8.3 Why is my kernel so big?
Nowadays kernels are compiled in /debug mode by default/. Kernels
On 11/26/12 22:02, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 26 November 2012, at 12:53, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/26/12 21:27, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/26/12 17:25, Jakub Lach wrote:
Thanks!
Regarding FAQ, some info about journalling should be added to
"Chapter 9 Disks, File Systems, and Boot Loaders", especia
Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/26/12 16:57, Jakub Lach wrote:
[...]
Thanks Miroslav Lachman for the reply with the correct sizes for GENERIC
kernels.
Change FAQ 8.3 Why is my kernel so big?
Nowadays kernels are compiled in /debug mode by default/. Kernels built
in debug mode contain many symbols th
On 26 November 2012, at 12:53, Bas Smeelen wrote:
> On 11/26/12 21:27, Bas Smeelen wrote:
>> On 11/26/12 17:25, Jakub Lach wrote:
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Regarding FAQ, some info about journalling should be added to
>>> "Chapter 9 Disks, File Systems, and Boot Loaders", especially now,
>>> when SU+
g,
apm is obsolete, no mention of ahci.
I think this is more of less complete sketch of power
saving facilities in FreeBSD-
http://wiki.freebsd.org/TuningPowerConsumption
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5764423.html
Sen
On 11/26/12 21:27, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/26/12 17:25, Jakub Lach wrote:
Thanks!
Regarding FAQ, some info about journalling should be added to
"Chapter 9 Disks, File Systems, and Boot Loaders", especially now,
when SU+J is default.
Please also add:
SU+J does not work (yet) with dump on a l
On 11/26/12 16:57, Jakub Lach wrote:
As a reminder, this isn't a contest in kernel size :)
Didn't mean to, I just put it there to state that 1.5 - 2.5 MB for a
GENERIC kernel is not appropriate anymore.
More useful would be if somebody would check GENERIC
on i386/amd64 for FAQ update.
Than
On 11/26/12 17:25, Jakub Lach wrote:
Thanks!
Regarding FAQ, some info about journalling should be added to
"Chapter 9 Disks, File Systems, and Boot Loaders", especially now,
when SU+J is default.
Add to FAQ 9.4 Which partitions can safely use Soft Updates? I have
heard that Soft Updates on /
On 26 November 2012 11:25, Jakub Lach wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> Regarding FAQ, some info about journalling should be added to
> "Chapter 9 Disks, File Systems, and Boot Loaders", especially now,
> when SU+J is default.
which question does this apply to, or is this a request for new questions?
--
Thanks!
Regarding FAQ, some info about journalling should be added to
"Chapter 9 Disks, File Systems, and Boot Loaders", especially now,
when SU+J is default.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5764360.html
Sen
Jakub Lach wrote:
As a reminder, this isn't a contest in kernel size :)
More useful would be if somebody would check GENERIC
on i386/amd64 for FAQ update.
FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE amd64 GENERIC
> ls -lh /boot/kernel/kernel
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel12M May 8 2012 /boot/kernel/kernel
FreeBSD
As a reminder, this isn't a contest in kernel size :)
More useful would be if somebody would check GENERIC
on i386/amd64 for FAQ update.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5764353.html
Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing
modules.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5764351.html
Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
On 11/26/2012 04:26 PM, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
26.11.2012 16:49, Jakub Lach:
Absolutely not, it's a heavily stripped custom kernel on this machine on
/boot/.
Do you call this heavily stripped? :)
> ls -la /boot/kernel/kernel
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 5757970 Nov 26 10:57 /boot/kernel/kern
26.11.2012 16:49, Jakub Lach:
Absolutely not, it's a heavily stripped custom kernel on this machine on
/boot/.
Do you call this heavily stripped? :)
> ls -la /boot/kernel/kernel
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 5757970 Nov 26 10:57 /boot/kernel/kernel
However it's very hard to strip kernel further
Absolutely not, it's a heavily stripped custom kernel on this machine on
/boot/.
I was pointing to that, if my kernel is 9 MB, there's no way GENERIC could
be
1.5-2.5 MB.
Sorry for confusion.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-revi
On 25 November 2012 13:28, Jakub Lach wrote:
> Why is my kernel so big?
>
> "As long as you make sure you follow the steps above, you can build your
> kernel normally, and you should notice a fairly large size decrease; most
> kernels tend to be around 1.5 MB to 2 MB."
>
> Not really, stripped amd
ot;
Needs rechecking, I doubt it's still applicable.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5764058.html
Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-sta
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5764056.html
Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listin
Please include some SSD recommended practice.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5764053.html
Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-stable
Am 23.11.2012 14:54, schrieb Andrea Venturoli:
On 11/23/12 10:25, Lars Engels wrote:
I've seen that on almost every USB MP3 player, Android mobile phones
and
on other USB devices that export an internal memory card.
BTW, my disk drive is SCSI attached, so it's not an USB-only issue.
So, it
On 11/23/12 10:25, Lars Engels wrote:
I've seen that on almost every USB MP3 player, Android mobile phones and
on other USB devices that export an internal memory card.
BTW, my disk drive is SCSI attached, so it's not an USB-only issue.
But it would be really really really great if someone(
Am 19.11.2012 21:07, schrieb Aldis Berjoza:
19.11.2012, 22:04, "Andrea Venturoli" :
On 11/19/12 18:44, Eitan Adler wrote:
Hey all,
The FAQ for FreeBSD needs a significant amount of updating and
changing. The first step in that process is to figure out what
needs
to be changed.
If you
On 19 November 2012 15:07, Aldis Berjoza wrote:
>
>
> 19.11.2012, 22:04, "Andrea Venturoli" :
>> On 11/19/12 18:44, Eitan Adler wrote:
>>
>>> Hey all,
>>>
>>> The FAQ for FreeBSD needs a significant amount of updating and
>>> changing. The first step in that process is to figure out what needs
19.11.2012, 22:04, "Andrea Venturoli" :
> On 11/19/12 18:44, Eitan Adler wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> The FAQ for FreeBSD needs a significant amount of updating and
>> changing. The first step in that process is to figure out what needs
>> to be changed.
>>
>> If you can a take a moment and t
On 11/19/12 18:44, Eitan Adler wrote:
Hey all,
The FAQ for FreeBSD needs a significant amount of updating and
changing. The first step in that process is to figure out what needs
to be changed.
If you can a take a moment and thoroughly review just one
question and add your comments and concern
On 11/19/12 18:44, Eitan Adler wrote:
Hey all,
The FAQ for FreeBSD needs a significant amount of updating and
changing. The first step in that process is to figure out what needs
to be changed.
If you can a take a moment and thoroughly review just one
question and add your comments and concern
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> The FAQ for FreeBSD needs a significant amount of updating and
> changing. The first step in that process is to figure out what needs
> to be changed.
>
> If you can a take a moment and thoroughly review just one
> question and a
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> The FAQ for FreeBSD needs a significant amount of updating and
> changing. The first step in that process is to figure out what needs
> to be changed.
>
> If you can a take a moment and thoroughly review just one
> question and a
Hey all,
The FAQ for FreeBSD needs a significant amount of updating and
changing. The first step in that process is to figure out what needs
to be changed.
If you can a take a moment and thoroughly review just one
question and add your comments and concerns it
would be immensely helpful.
http:/
54 matches
Mail list logo