On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 08:24:14AM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, Andrew Thompson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> >I have a patch here to MFC the rstp code to RELENG_6. It should be all
> >fine and dandy as for API but will cause the default spanning tree
> >version to change from stp to
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, Andrew Thompson wrote:
Hi,
I have a patch here to MFC the rstp code to RELENG_6. It should be all
fine and dandy as for API but will cause the default spanning tree
version to change from stp to rstp.
Is it ok to change the protocol version for the STABLE users (rstp is
ba
Hi,
I have a patch here to MFC the rstp code to RELENG_6. It should be all
fine and dandy as for API but will cause the default spanning tree
version to change from stp to rstp.
Is it ok to change the protocol version for the STABLE users (rstp is
backwards compatable with stp) or should it sti