Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 12:06:12 -0800
Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
nate> Thank you for tracking this down. It is interesting that BIF is
nate> heavyweight while BST is not. I guess that is expected behavior by OEMs
nate> which only test on Windows and so not eve
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 12:06:12 -0800
Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
nate> Thank you for tracking this down. It is interesting that BIF is
nate> heavyweight while BST is not. I guess that is expected behavior by OEMs
nate> which only test on
Hi,
> On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 12:06:12 -0800
> Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
nate> Thank you for tracking this down. It is interesting that BIF is
nate> heavyweight while BST is not. I guess that is expected behavior by OEMs
nate> which only test on Windows and so not everyone mak
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 11:24:16 -0500
Pierre-Luc Drouin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Ok, there is new development. I realized by playing with
debug.acpi.disabled="smbat", debug.acpi.disabled="smbat cmbat" and
debug.acpi.disabled="cmbat", that my laptop battery is not a
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 11:24:16 -0500
Pierre-Luc Drouin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Ok, there is new development. I realized by playing with
debug.acpi.disabled="smbat", debug.acpi.disabled="smbat cmbat" and
debug.acpi.disabled="cmbat", that my lapto
Hi,
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 11:24:16 -0500
> Pierre-Luc Drouin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Ok, there is new development. I realized by playing with
> debug.acpi.disabled="smbat", debug.acpi.disabled="smbat cmbat" and
> debug.acpi.disabled="cmbat", that my laptop battery is not a smbat,
>
Hi,
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 10:37:25 -0800
> Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> The cmbat has similar issue on some laptops. So, acpi_cmbat.c uses
> cache for retrieval to reduce its influence, and its expiration
> time is set by hw.acpi.battery.info_expire.
> However, acpi_smbat.c do
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 12:40:36 -0500
Pierre-Luc Drouin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
pldrouin> Yep, smart battery is definately the problem. The performance of my
pldrouin> laptop is back to normal when I remove the xfce4-battery-plugin.
pldrouin> acpiconf -i loop repr
Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Nate Lawson wrote:
Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 12:40:36 -0500
Pierre-Luc Drouin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
pldrouin> Yep, smart battery is definately the problem. The
performance of my pldrouin> laptop is back to normal whe
Nate Lawson wrote:
Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 12:40:36 -0500
Pierre-Luc Drouin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
pldrouin> Yep, smart battery is definately the problem. The
performance of my pldrouin> laptop is back to normal when I remove
the xfce4-batter
Nate Lawson wrote:
Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 12:40:36 -0500
Pierre-Luc Drouin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
pldrouin> Yep, smart battery is definately the problem. The
performance of my pldrouin> laptop is back to normal when I remove
the xfce4-batter
Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 12:40:36 -0500
Pierre-Luc Drouin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
pldrouin> Yep, smart battery is definately the problem. The
performance of my pldrouin> laptop is back to normal when I remove the
xfce4-battery-plugin. pldrouin> acpic
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 12:40:36 -0500
Pierre-Luc Drouin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
pldrouin> Yep, smart battery is definately the problem. The performance of my
pldrouin> laptop is back to normal when I remove the xfce4-battery-plugin.
pldrouin> acpico
Hi,
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 12:40:36 -0500
> Pierre-Luc Drouin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
pldrouin> Yep, smart battery is definately the problem. The performance of my
pldrouin> laptop is back to normal when I remove the xfce4-battery-plugin.
pldrouin> acpiconf -i loop reproduces the probl
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 12:40:36PM -0500, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Yep, smart battery is definately the problem. The performance of my
laptop is back to normal when I remove the xfce4-battery-plugin.
acpiconf -i loop reproduces the problem for me too. So it looks like
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 12:40:36PM -0500, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
> Yep, smart battery is definately the problem. The performance of my
> laptop is back to normal when I remove the xfce4-battery-plugin.
> acpiconf -i loop reproduces the problem for me too. So it looks like
> there is something
Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Last friday I did a cvsup src/buildworld/buildkernel/installkernel/installworld/mergemaster
on my laptop from 6.0-RELEASE to 6.0-STABLE and since the performance of my laptop (Dell
Precision M70 with a Pentium M 2GHz) is not good. It behaves
Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
> Last friday I did a cvsup
> src/buildworld/buildkernel/installkernel/installworld/mergemaster
> on my laptop from 6.0-RELEASE to 6.0-STABLE and since the performance of my
> laptop (Dell
> Precision M70 with a Pentium M 2GHz) is not good. It behaves like if the bus
>
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 02:35:23PM -0500, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
Hi.
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 12:40:53PM -0500, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
I wanted also to add that my mouse pointer hangs on X since the upgrade.
So the computer
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 02:35:23PM -0500, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
> Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
>
> >Hi.
> >
> >On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 12:40:53PM -0500, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I wanted also to add that my mouse pointer hangs on X since the upgrade.
> >>So the computer behaves as i
Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
Hi.
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 12:40:53PM -0500, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
I wanted also to add that my mouse pointer hangs on X since the upgrade.
So the computer behaves as if it was under heavy load even if the CPU
usage is almost 0%
cpufreq/powerd? Did you
Hi.
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 12:40:53PM -0500, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
> I wanted also to add that my mouse pointer hangs on X since the upgrade.
> So the computer behaves as if it was under heavy load even if the CPU
> usage is almost 0%
cpufreq/powerd? Did you check, your laptop runs at reaso
I wanted also to add that my mouse pointer hangs on X since the upgrade.
So the computer behaves as if it was under heavy load even if the CPU
usage is almost 0%
Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Last friday I did a cvsup
src/buildworld/buildkernel/installkernel/installworld/mergemaster on
my laptop
Last friday I did a cvsup
src/buildworld/buildkernel/installkernel/installworld/mergemaster on my
laptop from 6.0-RELEASE to 6.0-STABLE and since the performance of my
laptop (Dell Precision M70 with a Pentium M 2GHz) is not good. It
behaves like if the bus was saturated. I noticed that sound s
24 matches
Mail list logo
