Re: Postfix and tcpwrappers?

2016-07-25 Thread Willem Jan Withagen
gt;> tcp wrappers. >>>>> >>>>> A quick look at the config for postfix doesn't disclose an obvious >>>>> configuration solutiondid I miss it? >>>>> >>>> Don't know if postfix can handle tcp wrappers, but I use bruteb

Re: Postfix and tcpwrappers?

2016-07-25 Thread Karl Denninger
close an obvious >>>> configuration solution....did I miss it? >>>> >>> Don't know if postfix can handle tcp wrappers, but I use bruteblock >>> [1] for protecting connections via the ipfw firewall. I use this for >>> ssh and postfix. > Given the fact tha

Re: Postfix and tcpwrappers?

2016-07-25 Thread Willem Jan Withagen
ng the entries it makes which implies it is not linked with the >>> tcp wrappers. >>> >>> A quick look at the config for postfix doesn't disclose an obvious >>> configuration solutiondid I miss it? >>> >> >> Don't know if postfix can handl

Re: Postfix and tcpwrappers?

2016-07-25 Thread Karl Denninger
On 7/25/2016 14:38, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > On 07/25/2016 01:20 PM, Shawn Bakhtiar wrote: >> ecently a large body of clowncars have been targeting my sasl-enabled >> https gateway (which I use for client machines and thus do in fact need) >> and while sshguard picks up the attacks and tries to ban

Re: Postfix and tcpwrappers?

2016-07-25 Thread Tim Daneliuk
On 07/25/2016 01:20 PM, Shawn Bakhtiar wrote: > ecently a large body of clowncars have been targeting my sasl-enabled > https gateway (which I use for client machines and thus do in fact need) > and while sshguard picks up the attacks and tries to ban them, postfix > is ignoring the entries it

Re: Postfix and tcpwrappers?

2016-07-25 Thread Shawn Bakhtiar
On Jul 25, 2016, at 10:32 AM, Karl Denninger > wrote: On 7/25/2016 12:04, Ronald Klop wrote: On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 18:48:25 +0200, Karl Denninger > wrote: This may not belong in "stable", but since

Re: Postfix and tcpwrappers?

2016-07-25 Thread Karl Denninger
On 7/25/2016 12:04, Ronald Klop wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 18:48:25 +0200, Karl Denninger > wrote: > >> This may not belong in "stable", but since Postfix is one of the >> high-performance alternatives to sendmail >> >> Question is this -- I have sshguard protecting

Re: Postfix and tcpwrappers?

2016-07-25 Thread Ronald Klop
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 18:48:25 +0200, Karl Denninger wrote: This may not belong in "stable", but since Postfix is one of the high-performance alternatives to sendmail Question is this -- I have sshguard protecting connections inbound, but Postfix appears to be ignoring

Postfix and tcpwrappers?

2016-07-25 Thread Karl Denninger
This may not belong in "stable", but since Postfix is one of the high-performance alternatives to sendmail Question is this -- I have sshguard protecting connections inbound, but Postfix appears to be ignoring it, which implies that it is not paying attention to the hosts.allow file (and the