gt;> tcp wrappers.
>>>>>
>>>>> A quick look at the config for postfix doesn't disclose an obvious
>>>>> configuration solutiondid I miss it?
>>>>>
>>>> Don't know if postfix can handle tcp wrappers, but I use bruteb
close an obvious
>>>> configuration solution....did I miss it?
>>>>
>>> Don't know if postfix can handle tcp wrappers, but I use bruteblock
>>> [1] for protecting connections via the ipfw firewall. I use this for
>>> ssh and postfix.
> Given the fact tha
ng the entries it makes which implies it is not linked with the
>>> tcp wrappers.
>>>
>>> A quick look at the config for postfix doesn't disclose an obvious
>>> configuration solutiondid I miss it?
>>>
>>
>> Don't know if postfix can handl
On 7/25/2016 14:38, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> On 07/25/2016 01:20 PM, Shawn Bakhtiar wrote:
>> ecently a large body of clowncars have been targeting my sasl-enabled
>> https gateway (which I use for client machines and thus do in fact need)
>> and while sshguard picks up the attacks and tries to ban
On 07/25/2016 01:20 PM, Shawn Bakhtiar wrote:
> ecently a large body of clowncars have been targeting my sasl-enabled
> https gateway (which I use for client machines and thus do in fact need)
> and while sshguard picks up the attacks and tries to ban them, postfix
> is ignoring the entries it
On Jul 25, 2016, at 10:32 AM, Karl Denninger
> wrote:
On 7/25/2016 12:04, Ronald Klop wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 18:48:25 +0200, Karl Denninger
> wrote:
This may not belong in "stable", but since
On 7/25/2016 12:04, Ronald Klop wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 18:48:25 +0200, Karl Denninger
> wrote:
>
>> This may not belong in "stable", but since Postfix is one of the
>> high-performance alternatives to sendmail
>>
>> Question is this -- I have sshguard protecting
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 18:48:25 +0200, Karl Denninger
wrote:
This may not belong in "stable", but since Postfix is one of the
high-performance alternatives to sendmail
Question is this -- I have sshguard protecting connections inbound, but
Postfix appears to be ignoring
This may not belong in "stable", but since Postfix is one of the
high-performance alternatives to sendmail
Question is this -- I have sshguard protecting connections inbound, but
Postfix appears to be ignoring it, which implies that it is not paying
attention to the hosts.allow file (and the