Howard Leadmon wrote:
Hello All,
I have been running FBSD a long while, and actually running since the 5.x
releases on the server I am having troubles with. I basically have a small
network and just use NIS/NFS to link my various FBSD and Solaris machines
together.
This has all been run
> Are you running rpc.lockd? I've had very bad luck with it since
> sometime in the 5.x series... especially with it interoperating with
> Solaris. I submitted a PR on it, but it's apparently broken in about X
> ways. If possible, I would suggest living without rpc.lockd for now (if
> you're
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 02:28:55PM -0400, Howard Leadmon wrote:
>
>Hello All,
>
> I have been running FBSD a long while, and actually running since the 5.x
> releases on the server I am having troubles with. I basically have a small
> network and just use NIS/NFS to link my various FBSD a
ED]
> Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2006 5:54 PM
> To: Howard Leadmon
> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Trouble with NFSd under 6.1-Stable, any ideas?
>
> Howard Leadmon wrote:
> >Hello All,
> >
> > I have been running FBSD a long while, and actually
>
Howard Leadmon wrote:
Would this just be lockd, or should I disable both lockd and statd? I notice
in the rc.conf it claims they are both supposed to be enabled, so not sure
what issues I run into if I disable them, if any.
No need to disable rpc.statd though I don't know if any other program
-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kris Kennaway
> Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2006 10:50 PM
> To: Howard Leadmon
> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Trouble with NFSd under 6.1-Stable, any ideas?
>
> On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 02:28:55PM
On 5/14/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 02:28:55PM -0400, Howard Leadmon wrote:
>
>Hello All,
>
> I have been running FBSD a long while, and actually running since the 5.x
> releases on the server I am having troubles with. I basically have a small
> ne
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 05:43:32PM -0400, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> As I posted few days ago, I have similar problems like Howard's
> (some details in the thread "6.1-RELEASE, em0 high interrupt rate
> and nfsd eats lots of cpu" on stable@). After binary searching
> the source tree, I found that
>
> R
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 05:43:32PM -0400, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> On 5/14/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 02:28:55PM -0400, Howard Leadmon wrote:
> >>
> >>Hello All,
> >>
> >> I have been running FBSD a long while, and actually running since the
> >5.x
> >
> > > If there are any thing I can provide to help tracking this down.
> > > Please let me know. By the way, I tried with truss/kdump
> to see what
> > > happens when nfsd eats lot of CPUs, but in vain. They do
> not return anything.
> > >
> > I tried your recipe on 7-CURRENT with locally exp
On 5/23/06, Konstantin Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 05:43:32PM -0400, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> On 5/14/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 02:28:55PM -0400, Howard Leadmon wrote:
> >>
> >>Hello All,
> >>
> >> I have been running
On 5/23/06, Howard Leadmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > If there are any thing I can provide to help tracking this down.
> > > Please let me know. By the way, I tried with truss/kdump
> to see what
> > > happens when nfsd eats lot of CPUs, but in vain. They do
> not return anything.
> > >
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 10:19 AM
> To: Howard Leadmon
> Cc: Konstantin Belousov; Kris Kennaway; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Trouble with NFSd under 6.1-Stable, any ideas?
>
> On 5/23/06, Howard Leadmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
On 5/23/06, Howard Leadmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Rong-en,
Thanks for the info on getting the debugger configured, and on the serial
console. I will have to try and play with the serial console thing more, I
just tried putting in the flags and the damn thing hung, I had to boot
"Rong-en Fan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/14/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 02:28:55PM -0400, Howard Leadmon wrote:
[...]
Use tcpdump and related tools to find out what traffic is being sent.
Also verify that you did not change your system configur
AIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 3:09 PM
> To: Howard Leadmon
> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Trouble with NFSd under 6.1-Stable, any ideas?
>
> On 5/23/06, Howard Leadmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >Hello Rong-en,
> >
&
Another data point:
One of our NFS servers is an amd64 based system serving a cluster of web and
email servers. Under 6.1-RCx it gave us the same (or better) performance than
the server it replaced (which was 4.11). The server load hovered between 0.x
and 1.x
But after upping it to 6.1-STABLE t
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Leadmon
> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 1:23 PM
> To: 'Rong-en Fan'
> Cc: 'Konstantin Belousov'; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> Subject: RE: Trouble with NFSd under 6.1-Stable, any ideas?
>
>
>Hello Rong-en
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 11:48:53PM -0400, Howard Leadmon wrote:
> So what's changed at that delta, under the one that works vfs_lookup.c is:
>
> Edit src/sys/kern/vfs_lookup.c
> Add delta 1.80.2.6 2006.03.31.07.39.24 kris
>
>
> Under the one that fails the vfs_lookup.c is:
>
> Edit src/sys
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 01:19:26AM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 11:48:53PM -0400, Howard Leadmon wrote:
>
> > So what's changed at that delta, under the one that works vfs_lookup.c is:
> >
> > Edit src/sys/kern/vfs_lookup.c
> > Add delta 1.80.2.6 2006.03.31.07.39.24 kr
On 5/25/06, Konstantin Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 01:19:26AM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 11:48:53PM -0400, Howard Leadmon wrote:
>
> > So what's changed at that delta, under the one that works vfs_lookup.c is:
> >
> > Edit src/sys/kern/v
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 05:58:09PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> +options QUOTA
> options UFS_ACL # Support for access control lists
> options UFS_DIRHASH # Improve performance on big directories
> options MD_ROOT # M
Hi!
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 05:58:09PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> Please, users who reported the problem and willing to help,
> try the patch (generated against STABLE) and give the feedback.
I test it with RELENG_6 from 25 May 2006. It's work fine. Thank you.
WBR
--
Dmitriy Kirhlarov
Hello!
On Thu, 25 May 2006, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
KASSERT(!(debug_mpsafenet == 1 && mtx_owned(&Giant)),
("nfssvc_nfsd(): debug.mpsafenet=1 && Giant"));
from nfsserver/nfs_syscalls.c, line 570.
As I understand the problem, kern/vfs_lookup.c:lookup() could
aquir
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 01:06:44AM +0300, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> On Thu, 25 May 2006, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > KASSERT(!(debug_mpsafenet == 1 && mtx_owned(&Giant)),
> > ("nfssvc_nfsd(): debug.mpsafenet=1 && Giant"));
> >
> >from nfsserver/nfs_syscalls
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 01:06:44AM +0300, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> On Thu, 25 May 2006, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > KASSERT(!(debug_mpsafenet == 1 && mtx_owned(&Giant)),
> > ("nfssvc_nfsd(): debug.mpsafenet=1 && Giant"));
> >
> >from nfsserver/nfs_syscalls
26 matches
Mail list logo
