Re: Request for flowtable testers and actionable feedback RE: flowtable usable or not

2012-03-05 Thread Daniel Kalchev
On Mar 5, 2012, at 9:11 AM, H wrote: I have the right, even the obligation to point out what I think is wrong So, you see yourself as speaking for others? You certainly do not speak for me! Never authorized you for this, never ever knew you actually exist. For various historical reasons, I

Re: Request for flowtable testers and actionable feedback RE: flowtable usable or not

2012-03-05 Thread Adam Strohl
On 3/5/2012 15:00, Daniel Kalchev wrote: I happen to share the opinion and the experience of Mark Linimon in situations like this and yes, I do believe you have been rude here. For no reason whatsoever. I agree. This H person has been hijacking threads over the last week or so, and all of

Re: Request for flowtable testers and actionable feedback RE: flowtable usable or not

2012-03-05 Thread H
Daniel Kalchev wrote: On Mar 5, 2012, at 9:11 AM, H wrote: I have the right, even the obligation to point out what I think is wrong So, you see yourself as speaking for others? You certainly do not speak for me! Never authorized you for this, never ever knew you actually exist. For various

Re: Request for flowtable testers and actionable feedback RE: flowtable usable or not

2012-03-05 Thread H
Adam Strohl wrote: On 3/5/2012 15:00, Daniel Kalchev wrote: I happen to share the opinion and the experience of Mark Linimon in situations like this and yes, I do believe you have been rude here. For no reason whatsoever. I agree. This H person has been hijacking threads over the last week

Re: Request for flowtable testers and actionable feedback RE: flowtable usable or not

2012-03-05 Thread Tom Evans
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:37 PM, H h...@hm.net.br wrote: If you are curious about something, ask, right away ... clear and straight I'm curious about when you will stop trolling one of the last few fora on the internet where the SNR is actually high. This topic is discussing how users can help

Re: Request for flowtable testers and actionable feedback RE: flowtable usable or not

2012-03-04 Thread H
K. Macy wrote: I'm re-sending this portion of another mail as it will inevitably not be read by most readers by virtue of having been part of a long and digressive thread. this is exactly one of this statements which makes users (normal people) stay away a person-person understand this as

Re: Request for flowtable testers and actionable feedback RE: flowtable usable or not

2012-03-04 Thread Mark Linimon
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 02:28:37AM -0300, H wrote: because you don't care about what really matters, people, users, you do not even know how to talk to them I've been criticized for saying this to a user before, but I'm going to repeat it here regardless of consequences. I'm sorry, you (as a

Re: Request for flowtable testers and actionable feedback RE: flowtable usable or not

2012-03-04 Thread H
Mark Linimon wrote: On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 02:28:37AM -0300, H wrote: because you don't care about what really matters, people, users, you do not even know how to talk to them I've been criticized for saying this to a user before, but I'm going to repeat it here regardless of consequences.

Request for flowtable testers and actionable feedback RE: flowtable usable or not

2012-03-03 Thread K. Macy
I'm re-sending this portion of another mail as it will inevitably not be read by most readers by virtue of having been part of a long and digressive thread. subject line: flowtable usable or not It is possible to re-structure the routing code to have a smaller cache footprint / shorter lookup