Sorry for the late reply.
On 2008-Oct-19 11:39:02 +0300, Kostik Belousov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have built myself a looping 'ps -axl' which should let me gather more
information if it does re-appear. (In the process, I've found that ps
leaks memory, though that's not a problem until you
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 07:37:05PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
Sorry for the late reply.
On 2008-Oct-19 11:39:02 +0300, Kostik Belousov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have built myself a looping 'ps -axl' which should let me gather more
information if it does re-appear. (In the process, I've
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 02:21:04PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2008-Oct-15 21:37:36 +0100, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter, there was a bug causing dump to hang (completely unrelated to
UFS2 snapshot generation) merged to RELENG_7 a month or so ago. Can you
try updating?
On 2008-Oct-15 21:37:36 +0100, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter, there was a bug causing dump to hang (completely unrelated to
UFS2 snapshot generation) merged to RELENG_7 a month or so ago. Can you
try updating?
Well, dump wasn't hanging, rather it was hanging the rest of the
Last night, I attempted a full, compressed backup of my 181GB /home
(on a PATA disk) to a remote system. The backup started at 2159 and
everything appeared normal until about 0040 when the system became
non-responsive and this lasted until the dump completed at 1033. This
is the first full
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 07:24:28PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
Last night, I attempted a full, compressed backup of my 181GB /home
(on a PATA disk) to a remote system. The backup started at 2159 and
everything appeared normal until about 0040 when the system became
non-responsive and this
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 07:58:43PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2008-Oct-15 01:35:38 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 07:24:28PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
Last night, I attempted a full, compressed backup of my 181GB /home
(on a PATA disk) to a remote
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 08:48:09PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2008-Oct-15 02:08:48 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 07:58:43PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2008-Oct-15 01:35:38 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at
On 2008-Oct-15 01:35:38 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 07:24:28PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
Last night, I attempted a full, compressed backup of my 181GB /home
(on a PATA disk) to a remote system. The backup started at 2159 and
everything appeared
On 2008-Oct-15 02:08:48 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 07:58:43PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2008-Oct-15 01:35:38 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 07:24:28PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
Last night, I attempted a
Based on progress reports from both dump and my fifo process, the
snapshot removal began about 10 hours _after_ the system froze
(during this time, dump wrote about 143GB). Given the timeline,
it's fairly clear that neither mksnap_ffs nor the 'rm snapshot'
were running at the time the system
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [081015 12:00] wrote:
Perhaps a 'show locks' with an 8-CURRENT kernel with WITNESS enabled
will shed light on the problem? As most of the filesystem locking
doesn't use lockmgr in 7-STABLE, it would be silent with that kernel.
I might be wrong here, but
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Has anyone else seen anything similar?
It's a known problem documented in my Wiki -- see dump/restore. Note
the part about UFS2 snapshot generation. I'm almost certain this is
what you're describing.
I don't know how you can say this so confidently without even
On 10/15/08, Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [081015 12:00] wrote:
Perhaps a 'show locks' with an 8-CURRENT kernel with WITNESS enabled
will shed light on the problem? As most of the filesystem locking
doesn't use lockmgr in 7-STABLE, it would
14 matches
Mail list logo
