On Mon 2010-12-06 (13:07), Gareth de Vaux wrote:
> 'zpool replace' also only works if you physically swap out a disk
> at the same port, or replace disk1 with disk2 online. 'zpool remove'
> and 'zpool detach' don't remove devices from a raidz.
>
> So I can recover an array if I have an extra disk
On Sat 2010-11-27 (15:22), Gareth de Vaux wrote:
> Hi all, I'm trying to simulate a disk fail and replacement in
> a raidz array and failing myself. What'm I doing wrong? Here's
Ok I did some science, it looks like the array doesn't like me
throwing zeros at the disk when it's 'offline'. If I take
On Sat 2010-11-27 (07:30), Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> uname -a please -- it matters greatly.
$ uname -a
FreeBSD file 8.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-PRERELEASE #0: Wed Nov 24 07:56:04 SAST
2010 r...@file:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/COWNEL amd64
___
freebsd-stabl
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 03:22:49PM +0200, Gareth de Vaux wrote:
> Hi all, I'm trying to simulate a disk fail and replacement in
> a raidz array and failing myself. What'm I doing wrong? Here's
> a transcript with interspersed commentary:
>
> r...@file:~# zpool status
> pool: raid
> state: ONLIN
Hi all, I'm trying to simulate a disk fail and replacement in
a raidz array and failing myself. What'm I doing wrong? Here's
a transcript with interspersed commentary:
r...@file:~# zpool status
pool: raid
state: ONLINE
scrub: scrub completed after 0h0m with 0 errors on Sat Nov 27 13:20:06 2010
