Re: adding athlon xp to bsd.cpu.mk

2001-10-29 Thread cameron grant
from what i can see, identcpu.c fetches the cpu name using a cpuid instruction. The part cpuid gives you is AuthenticAMD. The fancy name is determined by switching on the Id. read identcpu.c. you are correct for k6 and lesser processors. the code in question is around line 323:

Re: adding athlon xp to bsd.cpu.mk

2001-10-28 Thread matt
Message - From: David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: cameron grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 4:42 PM Subject: Re: adding athlon xp to bsd.cpu.mk On Sun, Oct 28

Re: adding athlon xp to bsd.cpu.mk

2001-10-28 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 10:29:00AM -0800, matt wrote: any one know if my 4.3 stable work with all AMD processors, as well as with SMP enabled? Yes it will. I certifed 4.3 RELEASE (and thus 4.3-STABLE) on the SMP Thunder for AMD. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe

Re: adding athlon xp to bsd.cpu.mk

2001-10-28 Thread Brandon D. Valentine
On Sun, 28 Oct 2001, Maxim Sobolev wrote: AFAIK, not quite. The core name is Palomino and there are three processors based on it: Athlon XP, Athlon MP and Duron. The AMD Athlon XP, MP, and mobile Athlon4 are based on the Palomino core. The 1Ghz+ Durons are based on the Morgan core, a Palomino

Re: adding athlon xp to bsd.cpu.mk

2001-10-27 Thread Greg Childers
Shouldn't Athlons and AthlonXPs be able to use i686 (pentiumpro) instruction set optimizations? No. They are different cpu cores that have different optimization strategies. Yes, all Athlons can use i686 code while the k6's can't. Further, without doing any scientific testing, I would

Re: adding athlon xp to bsd.cpu.mk

2001-10-27 Thread Cyrille Lefevre
Peter Wemm wrote: Jerry A! wrote: On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 10:00:44PM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: : Hi, : : how about the following patch (untested) regarding the newer athlon xp : processor type ? if needed, I could submit a PR. Shouldn't Athlons and AthlonXPs be able to use