and sorry for my english! :)
2007/6/6, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 10:50:23AM +0400, Alexey Karagodov wrote:
> all the problem of freebsd is that freebsd-team tries (mostly
unsuccesfully)
> to do EVERYTHING
> freebsd team not just do freebsd, they doing freebsd5,
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 10:50:23AM +0400, Alexey Karagodov wrote:
> all the problem of freebsd is that freebsd-team tries (mostly unsuccesfully)
> to do EVERYTHING
> freebsd team not just do freebsd, they doing freebsd5, freebsd6, freebsd7,
> ports, etc ...
> and nothing of this can work REALLY STA
all the problem of freebsd is that freebsd-team tries (mostly unsuccesfully)
to do EVERYTHING
freebsd team not just do freebsd, they doing freebsd5, freebsd6, freebsd7,
ports, etc ...
and nothing of this can work REALLY STABLE AND FUNCTIONAL
i don't like linux, but sometimes i have to choose it
i
John Walthall wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 11:10:06AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
As someone who has had to show many people "how" to use the FreeBSD
installer, I can confirm what Chris is referring to.
Here's some of the generic end-user complaints I've heard (and some
of which I have);
[
Actually, I don't see how RELENG_X branch will help. %-\
I would suggest this scheme:
branch "." - as now, the recent versions
branch "sec" - versions bump strictly at 1-st of january and 1-st of july,
other updates fix only security issues.
That would be really great improvement to ports, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Saturday, May 19, 2007 22:01:26 +0100 Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With the ports freeze I wonder in situations when a full freeze is
> needed it is better to do so on a seperate testing branch so it allows
> security commits etc. to c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Saturday, May 19, 2007 01:22:40 -0700 KAYVEN RIESE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 17 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Linimon) wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 01:35:10PM -0500, Craig Boston wrote:
>>
>> The alternative would h
On 19/05/07, Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Saturday, May 19, 2007 01:22:40 -0700 KAYVEN RIESE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 17 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Linimon) wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 01:35:10
On Thu, 17 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Linimon) wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 01:35:10PM -0500, Craig Boston wrote:
The alternative would have been to commit what we had and _then_ found
out all the bugs in the upgrade process (note: you won't be able to just
blindly use portupgrade -a
On Fri, 18 May 2007, Philipp Ost wrote:
The only other concern I have is the
I-don't-know-which-field-is-in-focus-bug. But I have to admit that I rarely
use sysinstall, so I don't bother that much...
Jeremy hit the nail on the head with that one. I do use it fairly often
and have gotten use
On Thursday 17 May 2007 15:10:06 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 05:51:07PM +0100, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 16:30 +0100, Chris wrote:
> > > A more user friendly installer so datacentres stop been put off
> > > FreeBSD.
> >
> > Although work on a new installer
John Walthall wrote:
And let's not forget the infamous geometry bug! For me, at least sysinstall
> has always, 100% of the time, incorrectly detected my disc geometry.
Same here. I ignored it every time and got no problems at all...
Sysinstall is adequate, nothing more, nothing less. I don't
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 11:10:06AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> As someone who has had to show many people "how" to use the FreeBSD
> installer, I can confirm what Chris is referring to.
>
> Here's some of the generic end-user complaints I've heard (and some
> of which I have);
[...]
And let's
Ivan Voras wrote:
> Chris wrote:
>
>> and its for a desktop element of the os, does it matter if servers
>> running FreeBSD have to remain on vulnerable versions of ports as a
>> result of this?
>
> This looks like another call to have RELENG_x branches on ports, with
> which I agree.
Hmm... Br
Chris wrote:
and its for a desktop element of the os, does it matter if servers
running FreeBSD have to remain on vulnerable versions of ports as a
result of this?
This looks like another call to have RELENG_x branches on ports, with
which I agree.
__
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> As someone who has had to show many people "how" to use the FreeBSD
> installer, I can confirm what Chris is referring to.
>
> Here's some of the generic end-user complaints I've heard (and some
> of which I have);
[...]
As someone who only very rarely plays with the inst
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 01:35:10PM -0500, Craig Boston wrote:
> > Now this is totally bogus. The freeze before the 6.0 release was VERY
> > long and several have been longer than this one has been so far.
>
> I think the complaint may be more a result of this being a deeper freeze
> than normal.
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 10:24:15AM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > The recent ports freeze has also concerned me, this is the longest
> > ports freeze I have witnessed since I started using FreeBSD years ago
> > and its for a desktop element of the os, does it matter if servers
> > running FreeBSD
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 05:51:07PM +0100, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 16:30 +0100, Chris wrote:
> > A more user friendly installer so datacentres stop been put off FreeBSD.
>
> Although work on a new installer is "ongoing", nobody ever seems to be
> clear what the problems are wi
> Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 16:30:50 +0100
> From: Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I have mentioned this before about releasing a new major version of
> FreeBSD at such short intervals. Now I am wondering what path the
> FreeBSD community is taking in regards to server and
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 16:30 +0100, Chris wrote:
> Stuff I would love to see in FreeBSD 7.x (CURRENT) before 7.0 release
> which looks like it isnt going to happen
[snip]
> More hardware support - FreeBSD still has poor hardware support when
> compared to other OS's, in particular vendors such as
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 04:30:50PM +0100, Chris wrote:
> The recent ports freeze has also concerned me, this is the longest
> ports freeze I have witnessed since I started using FreeBSD years ago
> and its for a desktop element of the os, does it matter if servers
> running FreeBSD have to remain
I have mentioned this before about releasing a new major version of
FreeBSD at such short intervals. Now I am wondering what path the
FreeBSD community is taking in regards to server and desktop use.
Stuff I would love to see in FreeBSD 7.x (CURRENT) before 7.0 release
which looks like it isnt g
23 matches
Mail list logo