On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:54:12PM +0100, Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 08:39:55PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > Ok, try attached patch.
>
> > Index: sys/dev/re/if_re.c
> > ===
> > --- sys/dev/re/if_
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 08:39:55PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> Ok, try attached patch.
> Index: sys/dev/re/if_re.c
> ===
> --- sys/dev/re/if_re.c(revision 187352)
> +++ sys/dev/re/if_re.c(working copy)
> @@ -15
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:39:55 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon wrote
about Re: fun with if_re:
PY> Ok, try attached patch.
Thanks, building new images right now. I'll be back later (next week).
cu
Gerrit
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing l
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:41:43AM +0100, Gerrit K?hn wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:24:00 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon wrote
> about Re: fun with if_re:
>
> PY> > I had to reboot some of the machines meanwhile and could do some
> PY> > further testing. One strange thing
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:24:00 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon wrote
about Re: fun with if_re:
PY> > I had to reboot some of the machines meanwhile and could do some
PY> > further testing. One strange thing I noticed is that the
PY> > re-interfaces often do not come up in a work
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:19:10AM +0100, Gerrit K?hn wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 17:28:04 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon wrote
> about Re: fun with if_re:
>
> PY> > I did build new nanobsd images with these patches meanwhile and will
> PY> > start using them today. Howeve
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 17:28:04 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon wrote
about Re: fun with if_re:
PY> > I did build new nanobsd images with these patches meanwhile and will
PY> > start using them today. However, as it has worked without problems
PY> > for weeks with the buggy version before,
As I don't own that server anymore, I'm afraid I can't tell you whether
it's working now. :(
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 10:31:47AM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 06:37:53PM +0100, Henrik Friedrichsen wrote:
> > Hey.
> >
> > I have had similar symptoms on a dedicated server wi
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:05:46 +0100 Gerrit Kühn
wrote about Re: fun with if_re:
GK> Sorry to be back so soon again, but I just noticed that I did in fact
GK> not produce new images yesterday. :-)
GK> Kernel build stopped with
[...]
Ignore me, my bad (downloaded the webpage instead of
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 17:28:04 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon wrote
about Re: fun with if_re:
PY> > I did build new nanobsd images with these patches meanwhile and will
PY> > start using them today. However, as it has worked without problems
PY> > for weeks with the buggy version before,
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 08:58:12AM +0100, Gerrit K?hn wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 19:46:55 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon wrote
> about Re: fun with if_re:
>
>
> PY> Since you're using RTL8169SC it could be related with my commit
> PY> r180519(cvs rev 1.95.2.22). It seems
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 19:46:55 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon wrote
about Re: fun with if_re:
PY> Since you're using RTL8169SC it could be related with my commit
PY> r180519(cvs rev 1.95.2.22). It seems that RTL8169SC does not like
PY> memory mapped register access and I think jkim@ committed
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 06:37:53PM +0100, Henrik Friedrichsen wrote:
> Hey.
>
> I have had similar symptoms on a dedicated server with the re driver.
> What I did was grab more recent drivers (which might be redundant now)
> and disable a set of features that weren't stable at the time.
re(4) had
Hey.
I have had similar symptoms on a dedicated server with the re driver.
What I did was grab more recent drivers (which might be redundant now)
and disable a set of features that weren't stable at the time.
Please have a look at this PR that I submitted back then:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/que
Am 04.02.2009 um 10:05 schrieb Gerrit Kühn:
After the last update (11th December 2008) I have noticed the
following
strange behaviour on at least two machines (identical hard- and
software):
After weeks of flawless operation, the network connection on both
interfaces suddenly starts to mang
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 10:05:07AM +0100, Gerrit K?hn wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have several routers here which are based on Jetway J7F4 ITX boards that
> come with two onboard re-interfaces. I run 7-stable on them via nanobsd
> and update them about once in three or four months.
>
> After the las
Hi folks,
I have several routers here which are based on Jetway J7F4 ITX boards that
come with two onboard re-interfaces. I run 7-stable on them via nanobsd
and update them about once in three or four months.
After the last update (11th December 2008) I have noticed the following
strange behaviou
17 matches
Mail list logo
