Hello,
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 22:28:25 -0700
Randi Harper ra...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Bruce Cran br...@cran.org.uk wrote:
On Saturday 03 April 2010 21:58:56 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 05:48:12PM -0300, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
I just installed a
Hello,
On Sat, 3 Apr 2010 15:44:50 -0600 (MDT)
Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
On Sat, 3 Apr 2010, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 05:48:12PM -0300, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
I just installed a 8.0R amd64 from memstick. when asked, I said to
leave mbr untouched. when I
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Bruce Cran br...@cran.org.uk wrote:
On Saturday 03 April 2010 21:58:56 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 05:48:12PM -0300, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
I just installed a 8.0R amd64 from memstick. when asked, I said to
leave mbr untouched. when I
hail,
I just installed a 8.0R amd64 from memstick. when asked, I said to leave mbr
untouched. when I rebooted, it was freebsd bootloader that was on control. this
options is not what I think it should, or there is really a issue here ?
thanks,
matheus
--
We will call you cygnus,
The God of
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 05:48:12PM -0300, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
I just installed a 8.0R amd64 from memstick. when asked, I said to
leave mbr untouched. when I rebooted, it was freebsd bootloader that
was on control. this options is not what I think it should, or there
is really a issue here ?
On Sat, 3 Apr 2010, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 05:48:12PM -0300, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
I just installed a 8.0R amd64 from memstick. when asked, I said to
leave mbr untouched. when I rebooted, it was freebsd bootloader that
was on control. this options is not what I think it
On Saturday 03 April 2010 21:58:56 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 05:48:12PM -0300, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
I just installed a 8.0R amd64 from memstick. when asked, I said to
leave mbr untouched. when I rebooted, it was freebsd bootloader that
was on control. this options is