Rob said:
Hi,
For 5.3 in /usr/share/examples/cvsup, there's:
stable-supfile : for FreeBSD-stable
standard-supfile : for FreeBSD-current
I find this naming rather confusing. Why stable refers to STABLE, but
standard refers to CURRENT ?
This causes unnecessary confusion. Why not
El Lunes, 6 de Diciembre de 2004 08:39, Rob escribió:
Hi,
For 5.3 in /usr/share/examples/cvsup, there's:
stable-supfile : for FreeBSD-stable
standard-supfile : for FreeBSD-current
I find this naming rather confusing. Why stable refers to STABLE,
but standard refers to CURRENT ?
At 7:36 PM +0100 12/6/04, Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
El Lunes, 6 de Diciembre de 2004 08:39, Rob escribió:
Hi,
For 5.3 in /usr/share/examples/cvsup, there's:
stable-supfile : for FreeBSD-stable
standard-supfile : for FreeBSD-current
I find this naming rather confusing. Why stable refers to
Rob wrote:
For 5.3 in /usr/share/examples/cvsup, there's:
stable-supfile : for FreeBSD-stable
standard-supfile : for FreeBSD-current
I find this naming rather confusing. Why stable refers to STABLE, but
standard refers to CURRENT ?
Actually, this is not correct. For 5.3-RELEASE and
Hi,
For 5.3 in /usr/share/examples/cvsup, there's:
stable-supfile : for FreeBSD-stable
standard-supfile : for FreeBSD-current
I find this naming rather confusing. Why stable refers to STABLE, but
standard refers to CURRENT ?
This causes unnecessary confusion. Why not the following name