Re: names of supfiles in /usr/share/examples/cvsup

2004-12-06 Thread Mike Jakubik
Rob said: Hi, For 5.3 in /usr/share/examples/cvsup, there's: stable-supfile : for FreeBSD-stable standard-supfile : for FreeBSD-current I find this naming rather confusing. Why stable refers to STABLE, but standard refers to CURRENT ? This causes unnecessary confusion. Why not

Re: names of supfiles in /usr/share/examples/cvsup

2004-12-06 Thread Jose M Rodriguez
El Lunes, 6 de Diciembre de 2004 08:39, Rob escribió: Hi, For 5.3 in /usr/share/examples/cvsup, there's: stable-supfile : for FreeBSD-stable standard-supfile : for FreeBSD-current I find this naming rather confusing. Why stable refers to STABLE, but standard refers to CURRENT ?

Re: names of supfiles in /usr/share/examples/cvsup

2004-12-06 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 7:36 PM +0100 12/6/04, Jose M Rodriguez wrote: El Lunes, 6 de Diciembre de 2004 08:39, Rob escribió: Hi, For 5.3 in /usr/share/examples/cvsup, there's: stable-supfile : for FreeBSD-stable standard-supfile : for FreeBSD-current I find this naming rather confusing. Why stable refers to

Re: names of supfiles in /usr/share/examples/cvsup

2004-12-06 Thread Jon Noack
Rob wrote: For 5.3 in /usr/share/examples/cvsup, there's: stable-supfile : for FreeBSD-stable standard-supfile : for FreeBSD-current I find this naming rather confusing. Why stable refers to STABLE, but standard refers to CURRENT ? Actually, this is not correct. For 5.3-RELEASE and

names of supfiles in /usr/share/examples/cvsup

2004-12-05 Thread Rob
Hi, For 5.3 in /usr/share/examples/cvsup, there's: stable-supfile : for FreeBSD-stable standard-supfile : for FreeBSD-current I find this naming rather confusing. Why stable refers to STABLE, but standard refers to CURRENT ? This causes unnecessary confusion. Why not the following name