On Sunday 27 February 2005 06:12 pm, Nate Lawson wrote:
> Nate Lawson wrote:
> > My system hangs a long time in ata_generic_reset() while
> > resuming. I did some hunting and found that the loop was running
> > for the full 310 * 100 ms (31 seconds). The bug is that the loop
> > never exits when
Anish Mistry wrote:
On Sunday 27 February 2005 06:12 pm, Nate Lawson wrote:
Nate Lawson wrote:
My system hangs a long time in ata_generic_reset() while
resuming. I did some hunting and found that the loop was running
for the full 310 * 100 ms (31 seconds). The bug is that the loop
never exi
My system hangs a long time in ata_generic_reset() while resuming. I
did some hunting and found that the loop was running for the full 310 *
100 ms (31 seconds). The bug is that the loop never exits when mask
goes to 0 even though this is a termination condition (see end of the
loop where the
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Nate Lawson writes:
>Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Nate Lawson writes:
>>>My system hangs a long time in ata_generic_reset() while resuming. I
>>>did some hunting and found that the loop was running for the full 310 *
>>>100 ms (31 se
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Nate Lawson writes:
>My system hangs a long time in ata_generic_reset() while resuming. I
>did some hunting and found that the loop was running for the full 310 *
>100 ms (31 seconds).
Have you tried sos@ new ATAng mk III patches ? As far as I know he
plans to
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
I think you can trust sos@ to not do anything to the stuff in the tree
until he sticks the new stuff in there, so testing his patches like he
asked for is better use of your time.
Nate's patch looks straightforward enough to me. I'd like to see it
Nate Lawson wrote:
My system hangs a long time in ata_generic_reset() while resuming. I
did some hunting and found that the loop was running for the full 310 *
100 ms (31 seconds). The bug is that the loop never exits when mask
goes to 0 even though this is a termination condition (see end of
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Nate Lawson writes:
My system hangs a long time in ata_generic_reset() while resuming. I
did some hunting and found that the loop was running for the full 310 *
100 ms (31 seconds).
Have you tried sos@ new ATAng mk III patches ? As f
> Have you tried sos@ new ATAng mk III patches ?
yes. they break resume on a thinkpad t41 and now seem to break
my pcmcia cf insert (see other email).
but otherwise, i like them a lot!
randy
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.f
Anish Mistry wrote:
On Sunday 27 February 2005 06:12 pm, Nate Lawson wrote:
Nate Lawson wrote:
My system hangs a long time in ata_generic_reset() while
resuming. I did some hunting and found that the loop was running
for the full 310 * 100 ms (31 seconds). The bug is that the loop
never exits whe
On Sunday 27 February 2005 06:12 pm, Nate Lawson wrote:
> Nate Lawson wrote:
> > My system hangs a long time in ata_generic_reset() while
> > resuming. I did some hunting and found that the loop was running
> > for the full 310 * 100 ms (31 seconds). The bug is that the loop
> > never exits when
re@ note: This might be important for 5.4-release
At 5:59 PM -0800 2/27/05, Nate Lawson wrote:
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
One minor point: Søren is on vacation right now. I *think* he
will be getting back around March 5th
Augh. Not the most convenient circumstances. I'm happy to work
with som
> Have you tried sos@ new ATAng mk III patches ?
yes. they break resume on a thinkpad t41 and now seem to break
my pcmcia cf insert (see other email).
but otherwise, i like them a lot!
randy
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fr
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
At 3:19 PM -0800 2/27/05, Nate Lawson wrote:
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Have you tried sos@ new ATAng mk III patches ? As far as I know
he plans to commit those shortly.
One minor point: Søren is on vacation right now. I *think* he will
be getting back around March 5th (ass
At 3:19 PM -0800 2/27/05, Nate Lawson wrote:
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Have you tried sos@ new ATAng mk III patches ? As far as I know
he plans to commit those shortly.
One minor point: Søren is on vacation right now. I *think* he will
be getting back around March 5th (assuming I understand what h
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
I think you can trust sos@ to not do anything to the stuff in the tree
until he sticks the new stuff in there, so testing his patches like he
asked for is better use of your time.
Nate's patch looks straightforward enough to me. I'd like to see it in
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Nate Lawson writes:
>Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Nate Lawson writes:
>>>My system hangs a long time in ata_generic_reset() while resuming. I
>>>did some hunting and found that the loop was running for the full 310 *
>>>100 ms (31 se
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Nate Lawson writes:
My system hangs a long time in ata_generic_reset() while resuming. I
did some hunting and found that the loop was running for the full 310 *
100 ms (31 seconds).
Have you tried sos@ new ATAng mk III patches ? As far a
Nate Lawson wrote:
My system hangs a long time in ata_generic_reset() while resuming. I
did some hunting and found that the loop was running for the full 310 *
100 ms (31 seconds). The bug is that the loop never exits when mask
goes to 0 even though this is a termination condition (see end of
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Nate Lawson writes:
>My system hangs a long time in ata_generic_reset() while resuming. I
>did some hunting and found that the loop was running for the full 310 *
>100 ms (31 seconds).
Have you tried sos@ new ATAng mk III patches ? As far as I know he
plans to
My system hangs a long time in ata_generic_reset() while resuming. I
did some hunting and found that the loop was running for the full 310 *
100 ms (31 seconds). The bug is that the loop never exits when mask
goes to 0 even though this is a termination condition (see end of the
loop where the
21 matches
Mail list logo