Hello to all,
I noticed such a problem:
I have a 6.1 RC2 and i have in rc.conf
pf_enable="YES"
pflogd_enable="YES"
but when the system boots i test with:
pfctl -vs rules
and there are not rules loaded.if i load them by hand there is no problem..
then i made:
rc_debug="YES"
and the first t
On Sunday 07 May 2006 01:59, Iantcho Vassilev wrote:
> I noticed such a problem:
>
> I have a 6.1 RC2 and i have in rc.conf
>
> pf_enable="YES"
> pflogd_enable="YES"
>
> but when the system boots i test with:
>
> pfctl -vs rules
>
> and there are not rules loaded.if i load them by hand there is no
/etc/rc.d/pf rcvar - returns YES
my pf doesn`t have any ALTQ use
I will try pf_flags -v
Any other suggestions...
On 5/7/06, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday 07 May 2006 01:59, Iantcho Vassilev wrote:
> I noticed such a problem:
>
> I have a 6.1 RC2 and i have in rc.conf
>
> pf_e
Also (if i didn`t mentioned it)..with rc_debug set i can`t see the pf being
checked at all...
in /var/log/messages i have..
May 7 12:00:30 tms_slave root: /etc/rc: INFO: checkyesno: inetd_enable is
set to NO.
May 7 12:00:30 tms_slave root: /etc/rc: INFO: checkyesno: hostapd_enable is
set to NO.
On 5/7/06, Pertti Kosunen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Iantcho Vassilev wrote:
> Hello to all,
>
>
> I noticed such a problem:
>
> I have a 6.1 RC2 and i have in rc.conf
>
> pf_enable="YES"
> pflogd_enable="YES"
pf_rules="/etc/pf.conf" # rules definition file for pf
I have also that line
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 03:49:08PM +0300, Iantcho Vassilev wrote:
> On 5/7/06, Pertti Kosunen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >Iantcho Vassilev wrote:
> >> Hello to all,
> >>
> >>
> >> I noticed such a problem:
> >>
> >> I have a 6.1 RC2 and i have in rc.conf
> >>
> >> pf_enable="YES"
> >> pflogd_
My mistake..
Is is actually pflog_enable="YES"
also i checked the /etc/rc.d/pf file permission => 755...
I just don`t know
On 5/7/06, Roland Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 03:49:08PM +0300, Iantcho Vassilev wrote:
> On 5/7/06, Pertti Kosunen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Iantcho Vassilev wrote:
> Hello to all,
>
>
> I noticed such a problem:
>
> I have a 6.1 RC2
Step one should be to upgrade to the latest 6-stable, and run mergemaster.
> and i have in rc.conf
>
> pf_enable="YES"
> pflogd_enable="YES"
I think you already corrected yourself to say that you hav
On 5/8/06, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Iantcho Vassilev wrote:
> Hello to all,
>
>
> I noticed such a problem:
>
> I have a 6.1 RC2
Step one should be to upgrade to the latest 6-stable, and run mergemaster.
I will do that in the next couple of days because i did it 5 days ago..
On 5/8/06, Michel Talon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
By the way, if you have a kernel *without* IPV6 support, the firewall
module
will *not* load. You will have to recompile the firewall module without
IPV6 support first. This is the most common cause of the problem you are
seeing.
--
Michel TA
On Mon, 8 May 2006, Iantcho Vassilev wrote:
IV> > By the way, if you have a kernel *without* IPV6 support, the firewall
IV> > module
IV> > will *not* load. You will have to recompile the firewall module without
IV> > IPV6 support first. This is the most common cause of the problem you are
IV> > se
On Mon, 8 May 2006, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
DM> BTW, ipfw says
DM>
DM> ipfw2 (+ipv6)
DM>
DM> even when it is build without inet6, which is a bit misleading.
The following simple patch fixes this.
Sincerely,
D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
On Mon, 8 May 2006, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
DM> On Mon, 8 May 2006, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
DM>
DM> DM> BTW, ipfw says
DM> DM>
DM> DM> ipfw2 (+ipv6)
DM> DM>
DM> DM> even when it is build without inet6, which is a bit misleading.
DM>
DM> The following simple patch fixes this.
Oh no, INET6 s
13 matches
Mail list logo
