Re: 3 quick questions about stack alignment for powerpc (32-bit) signal handlers [the change that caused misaligned]

2016-02-01 Thread Mark Millard
The -16/16 code below produced correct alignment but too little space. The -20/20 code below produces enough space but misalignment. To maintain 16-byte alignment while increasing the space would have required going from -16/16 to -32/32. At least that is how I understand this code. Index:

Re: GCC5: pkg vs. ports

2016-02-01 Thread Kubilay Kocak
Hi William, You may be seeing a previously saved config, try make rmconfig then check again, or look at OPTIONS_DEFAULT inside Makefile You're correct, if graphite *is* a default option, the package should have it . Only other thing I can think of is a silent graphite build failure that isn't

Re: GCC5: pkg vs. ports

2016-02-01 Thread William A. Mahaffey III
On 02/01/16 10:53, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: On 02/01/16 10:48, Kubilay Kocak wrote: If you need further help, freebsd-ports is the most appropriate list, feel free to reply there:) ./koobs Very well, I'll move this over there, sorry for the noise & thanks :-) Eek, when I

Re: GCC5: pkg vs. ports

2016-02-01 Thread William A. Mahaffey III
On 02/01/16 10:18, Kubilay Kocak wrote: Hi William, You may be seeing a previously saved config, try make rmconfig then check again, or look at OPTIONS_DEFAULT inside Makefile You're correct, if graphite *is* a default option, the package should have it . Only other thing I can think of is

Re: GCC5: pkg vs. ports

2016-02-01 Thread Kubilay Kocak
On 2/02/2016 3:24 AM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > On 02/01/16 10:18, Kubilay Kocak wrote: >> >> Hi William, >> >> You may be seeing a previously saved config, try make rmconfig then >> check again, or look at OPTIONS_DEFAULT inside Makefile >> >> You're correct, if graphite *is* a default

Re: GCC5: pkg vs. ports

2016-02-01 Thread Kubilay Kocak
On 2/02/2016 3:37 AM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > On 02/01/16 10:18, Kubilay Kocak wrote: >> >> Hi William, >> >> You may be seeing a previously saved config, try make rmconfig then >> check again, or look at OPTIONS_DEFAULT inside Makefile >> >> You're correct, if graphite *is* a default

Re: GCC5: pkg vs. ports

2016-02-01 Thread William A. Mahaffey III
On 02/01/16 10:48, Kubilay Kocak wrote: If you need further help, freebsd-ports is the most appropriate list, feel free to reply there:) ./koobs Very well, I'll move this over there, sorry for the noise & thanks :-) -- William A. Mahaffey III

GCC5: pkg vs. ports

2016-02-01 Thread William A. Mahaffey III
I just did a full 'pkg upgrade' on my FBSD 9.3R box, which installed the newest GCC5. I also updated ports. When I used the pkg-provided GCC5, it doesn't have graphite support enabled, so no auto-parallelization. When I checked the port w/ make showconfig. it shows graphite enabled. I am

Re: GCC5: pkg vs. ports

2016-02-01 Thread William A. Mahaffey III
On 02/01/16 10:40, Kubilay Kocak wrote: On 2/02/2016 3:24 AM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: On 02/01/16 10:18, Kubilay Kocak wrote: Hi William, You may be seeing a previously saved config, try make rmconfig then check again, or look at OPTIONS_DEFAULT inside Makefile You're correct, if