Re: Xorg 7.4 and umass devices - a bad combination?

2009-03-21 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
I did some more tests, this time with RELENG_7 / amd64: r...@kg-quiet# uname -a FreeBSD kg-quiet.kg4.no 7.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-PRERELEASE #2: Tue Mar 17 22:09:21 CET 2009 r...@kg-quiet.kg4.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/QUIET amd64 I updated the ports tree, and installed Xorg 7.4 (and Xfce 4.6.0) di

Re: Xorg 7.4 and umass devices - a bad combination?

2009-03-21 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 21:44:34 +0100 (CET) Juergen Lock wrote: > Just in case you haven't seen it yet... > > Apparently there have been issues on some hardware with the way xorg > (used to) probe the pci bus, see the `Unhappy Xorg upgrade' thread on > -stable, particularly: > http://docs.fr

Re: Xorg 7.4 and umass devices - a bad combination?

2009-03-21 Thread Juergen Lock
In article <20090318205909.07625cdb.torfinn.ingolf...@broadpark.no> you write: >Hello, > >More testing. >- I verified that listing the firewire drive while Xorg is running >doesn't seeem to cause any errors. >So I thought: what happens if I start Xorg (using startx), then exit it >and _then_ do an

Re: Xorg 7.4 and umass devices - a bad combination?

2009-03-18 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:59:09 +0100 Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > More testing. Also, drm uses irq 18. AFAICT, this doesn't conflict with anything else: Mar 18 20:49:45 kg-quiet kernel: drm0: port 0xef00-0xefff mem 0xd800-0xdfff,0xfdef-0xfdef irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci1 Mar 18 20

Re: Xorg 7.4 and umass devices - a bad combination?

2009-03-18 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
Hello, More testing. - I verified that listing the firewire drive while Xorg is running doesn't seeem to cause any errors. So I thought: what happens if I start Xorg (using startx), then exit it and _then_ do an 'ls' on the usb drives? First try: 'startx', do a couple of commands (like 'date', 'p

Re: Xorg 7.4 and umass devices - a bad combination?

2009-03-17 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 08:57:06 +0100 Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > It's maybe an interrupt problem. Can you do some vmstat'ing before > and after ? After starting Xorg (with startx this time), but before doing an 'ls' on one of the usb drives: r...@kg-quiet# vmstat procs memory page

Re: Xorg 7.4 and umass devices - a bad combination?

2009-03-17 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:15:13 +0100 Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > No, I am not. PS/" mouse and keyboard here. should read: PS/2 mouse and keyboard. -- Torfinn ___ freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb

Re: Xorg 7.4 and umass devices - a bad combination?

2009-03-17 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Monday 16 March 2009, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 05:01:16 +0900 (JST) > > "M. Warner Losh" wrote: > > In message: <20090316205626.b0ed5027.torfinn.ingolf...@broadpark.no> > > > > Torfinn Ingolfsen writes: > > : Have anyone seen bad performance when using umass d

Re: Xorg 7.4 and umass devices - a bad combination?

2009-03-16 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 05:01:16 +0900 (JST) "M. Warner Losh" wrote: > In message: <20090316205626.b0ed5027.torfinn.ingolf...@broadpark.no> > Torfinn Ingolfsen writes: > : Have anyone seen bad performance when using umass devices (external > : hard drives) in combination with Xorg 7.4? >

Re: Xorg 7.4 and umass devices - a bad combination?

2009-03-16 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <20090316205626.b0ed5027.torfinn.ingolf...@broadpark.no> Torfinn Ingolfsen writes: : Have anyone seen bad performance when using umass devices (external : hard drives) in combination with Xorg 7.4? I don't see it. But I'm not using a usb mouse/keyboard... Are you? Warne

Xorg 7.4 and umass devices - a bad combination?

2009-03-16 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
Hi, Have anyone seen bad performance when using umass devices (external hard drives) in combination with Xorg 7.4? The reason I ask is that I have this machine[1] which is both a test workstation, and cheap-ass fileserver. I am using external usb drives for storage (it was the cheapest option whe