Re: Heads up

2016-04-24 Thread Warner Losh
I'll try virtualbox again, but it booted fine when I tried it before. I'll give bhyve a sping. I haven't tried it in quite some time, but it worked about 9 months ago. But since I don't even know what the errors you are seeing are, I can't tell you that it is similar to some other error reports or

ixv device_attach: ixv0 attach returned 5 (was sr-iov issues, reset_hw() failed with error -100)

2016-04-24 Thread Ultima
The sr-iov vf driver is failing to attach. # pciconf -lv: (filtered to only relevant output) ix0@pci0:129:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x1458 chip=0x15288086 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Ethernet Controller 10-Gigabit X540-AT2' class = network

Problem reports for freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org that need special attention

2016-04-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and ob

Re: pptdevs option crashes system

2016-04-24 Thread David Ehrmann
It sounds like the bug I reported a while ago, but on a different chip family: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207602 On Sunday, April 24, 2016, Vesselin Mirewski wrote: > Hi, > I'm trying to bring up an excellent PCIe Fusion board which has no driver > for FreeBSD. I used bhy

pptdevs option crashes system

2016-04-24 Thread Vesselin Mirewski
Hi, I'm trying to bring up an excellent PCIe Fusion board which has no driver for FreeBSD. I used bhyve to bring up an ubuntu server ( which has an original driver by the manufacturer ) All went just fine, till I tried to pass through the board to the linux. My CPUs support all that's needed by bhy

Re: Heads up

2016-04-24 Thread Ivan Klymenko
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 11:44:43 +0300 Ivan Klymenko wrote: > On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 16:42:33 -0600 > Warner Losh wrote: > > > The CAM I/O scheduler has been committed to current. This work is > > described in > > https://people.freebsd.org/~imp/bsdcan2015/iosched-v3.pdf though the > > default schedul

[Differential] D1944: PF and VIMAGE fixes

2016-04-24 Thread kristof (Kristof Provost)
kristof added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS sys/netpfil/pf/pf_if.c:130 I don't understand why this is required. Surely if an ifnet lives in V_ifnet (so, lives in the current vnet) ifp->if_vnet is always going to be curvnet? sys/netpfil/pf/pf_if.c:141 Why add curvnet here? pfi_attach_ifn