http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39831 >
Had to split the long lines, and remove references that aren't true in all
rulesets, and use the correct local sz_strlcat(). I see the the entire
rest of the file needs to be updated, too
Committed trunk revision 14215.
Committed S2_2 r
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39831 >
Joan Creus wrote:
> I created this patch for the trunk last month. I have created now
> another patch for the 2.1 branch. Since the string freeze seems to be
> lifted, do you think that we could apply them?
>
> I am asking you because you
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39831 >
This transaction appears to have no content
Good. "Promoted" sounds perfect in this context.
Joan
2007/11/11, William Allen Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39831 >
>
> Joan Creus wrote:
> >
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39831 >
On Saturday 10 November 2007 10:26 am, Joan Creus wrote:
> Sorry about the delay. I think you nailed it right here. I have adapted the
> messages to include Eddie's and Randy's suggestions, and have added a
> reference to the Lighthouse.
Joa
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39831 >
Joan Creus wrote:
> For land units, except Diplomats and Spies:
> * Will be built as a veteran in cities with appropriate training facilities
> (see Barracks and Sun Tzu.) May also become veteran if it defeats an enemy
> unit.
>
In this mess
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39831 >
This transaction appears to have no content
2007/11/5, Eddie Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>
> Instead of "certain cities", how about
>
>
>
> 1) "cities with appropriate training facilities",
Sorry about the delay. I think you nail
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39831 >
"Joan Creus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39831 >
>
>I think you mean EFT_VETERAN_BUILD.
That sounds right.
>I would try to make it shorter, though.
>I think your suggestion is g
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39831 >
I think you mean EFT_VETERAN_BUILD. I would try to make it shorter, though.
I think your suggestion is great for the general manual, but here we are
dealing with the individual unit help. The original sentence ("may become
veteran throught tr
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39831 >
"Joan Creus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39831 >
>
>Good suggestion. I like it. Just one point: shouldn't it be "with Barracks"
>instead of "with a Barracks"? I'm not a native English speaker,
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39831 >
Good suggestion. I like it. Just one point: shouldn't it be "with Barracks"
instead of "with a Barracks"? I'm not a native English speaker, but it
doesn't feel right.
Can anybody improve on Randy's suggestion?
Joan
2007/11/
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39831 >
Joan,
I'm not a developer, really just a lurker, well, and a tweaker--on looking at
the messages you changed (thanks, btw), I wondered if they could be improved
any further--see below. Maybe you can take them even further.
regards,
Rand
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39831 >
This transaction appears to have no content
Hi,
When I started playing Freeciv, the sentence in the documentation that
puzzled me most was "May become veteran through training or combat". Combat
was clear, but I kept looking for ways to trai
12 matches
Mail list logo