[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #13586] [patch] economic report (was PR#40763) - help needed

2009-06-07 Thread Madeline Book
Update of bug #13586 (project freeciv): Status: In Progress = Confirmed Open/Closed:Open = Closed ___ Reply to this item at:

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #13586] [patch] economic report (was PR#40763) - help needed

2009-06-06 Thread Matthias Pfafferodt
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #13586 (project freeciv): The extra 'upkeep_info' field is needed for homeless units because even for the player who owns them they have no upkeep. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?13586

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #13586] [patch] economic report (was PR#40763) - help needed

2009-06-06 Thread Madeline Book
Follow-up Comment #6, bug #13586 (project freeciv): The extra 'upkeep_info' field is needed for homeless units because even for the player who owns them they have no upkeep. Would it be so bad just to show zero upkeep for those units? Are there any other circumstances when the extra

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #13586] [patch] economic report (was PR#40763) - help needed

2009-06-06 Thread Matthias Pfafferodt
Follow-up Comment #7, bug #13586 (project freeciv): Would it be so bad just to show zero upkeep for those units? Are there any other circumstances when the extra boolean field would be needed? I know only of the case of homeless unit. So the upkeep_info field can be removed. Please try it

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #13586] [patch] economic report (was PR#40763) - help needed

2009-06-04 Thread Madeline Book
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #13586 (project freeciv): I think we can safely adopt the convention that upkeep information will only be available for the player's own units. So we do not need the extra 'upkeep_info' boolean field; just check that the owner is the same the client's player. if the

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #13586] [patch] economic report (was PR#40763) - help needed

2009-05-29 Thread Matthias Pfafferodt
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #13586 (project freeciv): Ok, after some (a lot of!) searching I found my error. The upkeep information has to be processed two times in packhand.c - in unpackage_unit() and handle_unit_packet_common()! changes in version 2: - it's working! - move city_units_upkeep()

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #13586] [patch] economic report (was PR#40763) - help needed

2009-05-29 Thread Matthias Pfafferodt
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #13586 (project freeciv): one remark: if the editor is used the changes are visible in the next turn. I'm not sure, how to force an update. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?13586

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #13586] [patch] economic report (was PR#40763) - help needed

2009-05-29 Thread Madeline Book
Update of bug #13586 (project freeciv): Assigned to:None = mbook ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?13586 ___ Message sent

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #13586] [patch] economic report (was PR#40763) - help needed

2009-05-28 Thread Matthias Pfafferodt
URL: http://gna.org/bugs/?13586 Summary: [patch] economic report (was PR#40763) - help needed Project: Freeciv Submitted by: syntron Submitted on: Donnerstag 28.05.2009 um 12:13 Category: None Severity: 3

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #13586] [patch] economic report (was PR#40763) - help needed

2009-05-28 Thread Madeline Book
Update of bug #13586 (project freeciv): Category:None = general Status:None = In Progress ___ Follow-up Comment #1: - the unit upkeep