On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 10:01:40 AM Michael T. Pope wrote:
>[Strageness with matchesNull and getModifierSet]
> The more I look at this one the more worrying it looks. Pretty much
> anything involving modifiers ends up in that routine, and I really like
> being able to trust that the spec means what it
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 04:33:21 PM Michael Vehrs wrote:
> On 02.01.2013 11:29, Michael T. Pope wrote:
> > On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 08:25:20 PM Michael T. Pope wrote:
> >> On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 09:53:28 AM Michael Vehrs wrote:
> Then for now how about we just rename the existing basicProduction as
>
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 04:19:32 PM Michael Vehrs wrote:
> At any rate, the re-write of tile styles has paved the way for
> using an arbitrary number of equivalent tiles. We might also break down
> our tiles into smaller sub-tiles, or use alpha blending for tile boundaries.
I do not doubt the former wo
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 03:53:44 PM Russell Steinthal wrote:
> Thanks for committing so quickly!
Your report made a very clear and verifiable case that there was a problem.
If only they were all as easy:-).
> FWIW, I think I actually have a copy of Col1 on 3.5" floppy disks in one of
> my many piles,
Thanks for committing so quickly!
I'm not sure how much time I'll have to contribute now that my
Christmas-to-New Year's vacation has ended (and I have a backlog of coding
to do on some of my own projects :)), but I'll at least take a look at the
bug report and see what I can do.
FWIW, I think I
On 02.01.2013 11:29, Michael T. Pope wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 08:25:20 PM Michael T. Pope wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 09:53:28 AM Michael Vehrs wrote:
>>
Then for now how about we just rename the existing basicProduction as
basicPerUnitProduction and add a new field for
On 02.01.2013 00:00, Michael T. Pope wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Jan 2013 02:01:05 PM Michael Vehrs wrote:
>
>> On 01.01.2013 12:37, Michael T. Pope wrote:
>>
>>> Fair enough. I remain in favour of automatic generation, but less happy
>>> about the smoothness/regularity of the rivers and roads.
>
On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 08:25:20 PM Michael T. Pope wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 09:53:28 AM Michael Vehrs wrote:
> > > Then for now how about we just rename the existing basicProduction as
> > > basicPerUnitProduction and add a new field for the non-unit production.
> >
> > I had this idea, too. For
