On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 21:30:16 +1030
"Michael T. Pope" wrote:
> With the long delayed 0.11.0 release finally out the door, it is time to
> start edging towards requiring Java 7 for FreeCol.
This turned out to not be that painful. I fixed a bunch of places where
types were poorly specified, and lef
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:08:59 GMT
"Jonas Stumph Stevnsvig" wrote:
> I've been following the discussion on the list, but not committing myself due
> to a lot of other commitments, but would it be a help to you to do some test
> build of the codes against JDK 7 solely as "fuzz" testing?
No and yes
Hi devs.
I've been following the discussion on the list, but not committing myself due
to a lot of other commitments, but would it be a help to you to do some test
build of the codes against JDK 7 solely as "fuzz" testing?
--
Med Venlig Hilsen / with Regards,
Jonas Stumph Stevnsvig
Mobil:
With the long delayed 0.11.0 release finally out the door, it is time to
start edging towards requiring Java 7 for FreeCol. There is a bit of work
to do there (much of which is annotated with "FIXME in Java 7", although
there are bound to be omissions), so I doubt this will be quick. What can
def
