[Freedombox-discuss] Non-Debian packages (was: FreedomBox 24.21 released)

2024-10-07 Thread Stefan Monnier via Freedombox-discuss
James Valleroy via Freedombox-discuss [2024-10-07 21:40:36] wrote: > * django: Improve handling of file uploads > * nextcloud: Fix existing installs to upgrade properly Wait! What? FreedomBox includes Nextcloud now? But Nextcloud is not in Debian yet!? When did this happen? How did I miss it?

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Security issues if running wireshark on FreedomBox?

2024-02-26 Thread Stefan Monnier via Freedombox-discuss
> The instructions are clear as to why this failed, but before I > reconfigure wireshark appropriately, would this open a security risk? IIUC the main risk is to let some users see packets they shouldn't see. > Ultimately, what I would love to have is a real-time display with only > the kind of p

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Serving NTP from my FreedomBox

2024-01-06 Thread Stefan Monnier via Freedombox-discuss
> you could try 'openntpd' - that one is from openBSD, so it should not conflict > with systemd The conflict is not with systemd, it's much more fundamental: `systemsd-timesyncd` is an NTP client that wants to control the system's time, and `ntpsec` wants to do the same. Stefan ___

[Freedombox-discuss] Serving NTP from my FreedomBox

2024-01-06 Thread Stefan Monnier via Freedombox-discuss
FreedomBox is a great way to setup many different services, but I can't seem to figure out how to make it serve the time via the NTP protocol. I tried to do it by hand, but I can't install `ntpsec` because it conflicts with the `systemd-timesyncd` package which is required by FreedomBox. What am

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] FYI: FreedomBox upgrades, qemu.

2023-07-10 Thread Stefan Monnier via Freedombox-discuss
>> the qemu window steals the cursor rendering >> the whole computer inaccessible via mouse until I type CTRL + ALT + G > just to note, that is the expected behavior - you only needed to read the > WM window name (in the window title-bar or the task-bar) - when mouse-grab is > active, the window na

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] SearX, authentication, and use as a browser's search engine

2023-03-24 Thread Stefan Monnier via Freedombox-discuss
If noone here has any idea what might be going on or how to investigate it (how/where to set `DEBUG=True`), maybe someone has an idea of a better place to send this? Should I `reportbug` against Plinth? Stefan Stefan Monnier [2023-03-07 18:29:04] wrote: > I'm trying to use a

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Preventing auto-reboots and auto-updates?

2023-03-09 Thread Stefan Monnier via Freedombox-discuss
> On my dedicated Freedombox (Pioneer Edition) on version 23.4, the > checkbox is unchecked when the page refreshes with the green "Automatic > upgrades disabled" message. > > I think the checkbox is set based on the contents of > /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/20auto-upgrades. With the box checked I see a >

[Freedombox-discuss] FreedomBox as NTP server

2023-03-09 Thread Stefan Monnier via Freedombox-discuss
The machine on which I run FreedomBox is/was my local network's NTP server, but the latest update to `freedombox` brought in `systemd-timesyncd` as dependency, forcing the removal of conflicting packages `ntp` and `ntpsec`. How can I keep my machine as both a FreedomBox server and an NTP server?

[Freedombox-discuss] Preventing auto-reboots and auto-updates?

2023-03-09 Thread Stefan Monnier via Freedombox-discuss
Freedombox seems to like to reboot, but now that I use it on a box that I also use for other purposes, it's rather annoying. IIUC the reboots are linked to the "auto-update" functionality. But when I try to disable it, it ... "doesn't work". More specifically, I do the following: - Go to https:/

[Freedombox-discuss] SearX, authentication, and use as a browser's search engine

2023-03-07 Thread Stefan Monnier via Freedombox-discuss
I'm trying to use a personal SearX instance (installed in/via FreedomBox) as my browser's default search engine, but I keep getting this error: Forbidden (403) CSRF verification failed. Request aborted. You are seeing this message because this HTTPS site requires a “Referer

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Mastodon?

2022-11-20 Thread Stefan Monnier via Freedombox-discuss
> But note that this likely won't be sufficient for sending email from a home > server, due to ISPs blocking outgoing email port. The places I'm familiar with all have ISPs which let you use any port you like. So while this is a real problem, it's one that can usually be solved simply by changing

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] [OFFTOPIC] ARM64 board for Debian/Freedombox

2022-09-12 Thread Stefan Monnier via Freedombox-discuss
>> > but i will add, that it is equally uncertain if _any_ SBC >> > manufactured today, will still be functional in 10 years >> On the contrary: for obvious ecological reasons, it is absurd nowadays >> to buy a computer and plan to replace it before it's 10 years old. > regardless of the owners p

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] [OFFTOPIC] ARM64 board for Debian/Freedombox

2022-09-12 Thread Stefan Monnier via Freedombox-discuss
> but i will add, that it is equally uncertain if _any_ SBC > manufactured today, will still be functional in 10 years On the contrary: for obvious ecological reasons, it is absurd nowadays to buy a computer and plan to replace it before it's 10 years old. > more significantly though, i think it

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] ARM64 board for Debian/Freedombox

2022-09-12 Thread Stefan Monnier via Freedombox-discuss
> No, I think 64bit is a must in 2022. When running Freedombox style software, with a machine that has no more than 4GB, I highly doubt you'd be able to tell the difference between a machine running Debian's `arm64` and `armhf`. The only potential issue I can think of is the question whether Debi

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] ARM64 board for Debian/Freedombox

2022-09-11 Thread Stefan Monnier via Freedombox-discuss
> Thanks for the tip regarding Odroid-M1. I didn't quite understand why you > didn't use a standard Debian kernel? Because the standard Linux kernel does not (yet?) support this board. The manufacturer (Hardkernel) provides its own kernel (which tracks the vanilla Linux kernel) and that code is l

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] ARM64 board for Debian/Freedombox

2022-09-10 Thread Stefan Monnier via Freedombox-discuss
Evelyn Pereira Souza via Freedombox-discuss [2022-09-10 16:06:14] wrote: > Now I want something more open, Open Source. Therefore pure Debian and > a more open hardware than the Raspberry. You might like to be more precise about what you mean here. "Open Source" doesn't map very simply to hardwar

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] PDF on android device

2022-03-10 Thread Stefan Monnier via Freedombox-discuss
> Summary of https://f-droid.org/en/packages/org.freedombox.freedombox/ > is "A companion app for your FreedomBox server" > > Would that android app help with getting a PDF from a freedombox > to a android? > > Use case is having a PDF with a (QR)code that most be shown > at e.g. entrance (Concert

[Freedombox-discuss] [OFFTOPIC] fast-moving packages (was: Request for Comments: Agenda Items for 2020 Summit)

2020-11-25 Thread Stefan Monnier
> I put differently: I recommend those wanting to develop FreedomBox-like > things by more relaxed definitions of "Free" than those used in Debian > to join forces with Yunohost. And for FreedomBox to consider > recognizing that different definitions of "Free" exist (without relaxing > how Freedom

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Raspberry Pi complete

2020-11-04 Thread Stefan Monnier
> After my experience with Banana Pi R1, I would hesitate to buy Banana Pi > again. I did not mean to endorse the BananaPi. I do have one and am quite satisfied with it (I just wish it had 2GB or RAM rather than just one). FWIW, I have indeed heard people having some problems with the BananaPi-

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Raspberry Pi complete

2020-11-03 Thread Stefan Monnier
> If only the Raspberry Pi team would give priority to the need to get rid > of non-free binary blobs in our computers. There are several other small&cheap SBCs (such as the Banana Pi or products from Olimex or Pine64) which provide similar functionality without requiring any binary blobs (tho adm

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] New website is live!

2020-02-16 Thread Stefan Monnier
> The website looks like too much like an advert for a new product from one of > the monopolistic data brokers, or a company that wants to sell themselves to > the same. I also had a bit of this feeling (which OTOH is maybe just the result of having a well-crafted and appealing webpage) until I go

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Patch: Freedom-Maker support for Lamobo R1

2019-05-30 Thread Stefan Monnier
> If a machine boots without /boot properly mounted and the kernel or > u-boot packages get upgraded by unattended-upgrades, then the system > will fall into an inconsistent state. Could be, yes. But there's a pretty good probability in my experience that the inconsistent state is still "working"

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Patch: Freedom-Maker support for Lamobo R1

2019-05-19 Thread Stefan Monnier
> During boot, systemd tried to mount /boot because it saw an entry in > /etc/fstab. It should be listed with a UUID instead of /dev/something > device. No device with that UUID was found and so the boot process > eventually failed. I recommend adding the `nofail` option in the fstab entry, so tha

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Putting Hard Drives to Sleep When Not in Use

2018-10-29 Thread Stefan Monnier
>     Does Freedombox put hard drives to sleep when they're not in use? > Or is it possible to set it up to do that? Usually, the drives themselves take care of doing that, according to the power-management config you gave them. More specifically, this can be configured with `hdparm`, more specif

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] A20-OLinuXino-Lime2_Rev_H and higher most likely not able to run freedombox properly

2018-10-24 Thread Stefan Monnier
Not sure what kind of answer you're expecting from the freedombox community about this, but I'd suggest you contact Olimex about it (and maybe the sunxi-linux community). It's probaly easy to fix (maybe even just be tweaking the DTS file). Stefan Dieter writes: > Hello all! > > I rec

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] search engine Yacy

2018-07-10 Thread Stefan Monnier
>> I used to run Yacy on a FitPC2 (1GB of RAM, 1.6GHz Intel Atom), but it >> was problematic: I think it's OK to run it on a 1GB machine, but you >> can't run anything else alongside (I was trying to use the machine for >> other things at the same time). >> >> Note that the above page lists Git

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] search engine Yacy

2018-07-10 Thread Stefan Monnier
> integration is at https://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox/LeavingTheCloud > Yacy is listed there, but judged too heavy. I used to run Yacy on a FitPC2 (1GB of RAM, 1.6GHz Intel Atom), but it was problematic: I think it's OK to run it on a 1GB machine, but you can't run anything else alongside (I was

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] How do we encourage public adoption of Freedom Box

2018-07-02 Thread Stefan Monnier
> I wonder weather Eben Moglen uses FreedomBox and what does he think of it. > I also wonder why FreedomBox is all about self-hosting, but it does not > host itself. Agreed. > itself and does not rely on Debian infrastructure for everything. I also think the project would benefit from including