On 07/07/2011 02:46 AM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
BTW, if there is a way to include subtitles in html5 let me know.
i never used it, but it may interest you
http://www.universalsubtitles.org/en/
Feedback and code appreciated http://freedomboxfoundation.org
/stef
adding a "poster" image attrib
Hi Ian
> Behalf Of i...@churchkey.org
>
> I think the best way to do this is through something like a
> dynamicDNS centralized service. Currently, the network effect
> is on the side of intermediated social networks because
> having everyone's contacts in one place makes it much easier
> to
> s.alioth.debian.org] On Behalf Of Stefano Maffulli
>
> Feedback and code appreciated http://freedomboxfoundation.org /stef
I have to scroll horizontally to see the home page on my netbook :(
___
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
Freedombox-discuss@l
On 07/07/2011 02:41 AM, nathan nolast wrote:
> i think keysignings violate lutzs ease of use
I agree that current keysigning methods are cumbersome, primarily due to
the requirement that human beings have to cognitively process long
hexadecimal strings (large numbers).
I recommend reviewing the d
On 07/07/2011 05:20 AM, Robert Martinez wrote:
>
>
> On 07/07/2011 02:46 AM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
>> BTW, if there is a way to include subtitles in html5 let me know.
>
> i never used it, but it may interest you
> http://www.universalsubtitles.org/en/
That's actually what we're using for sub
On 07/07/2011 05:39 AM, John Walsh wrote:
> I think the only measures you can take to stop SPAM is probably a
> Block/Report Account
>
So, if we're dealing with centralized directories, you can report an
address to them and trigger whatever review process the community of
people in that directory
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 11:20 +0200, Robert Martinez wrote:
> adding a "poster" image attribute to the html5 video on the front page
> would be great.
I added the poster image and the universalsubtitles.
I can't find a way to pass the width/height attribute to the video using
the universalsubtitl
On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 15:52 -0400, i...@churchkey.org wrote:
> I think it is important to consider that people want a mechanism for
> enforcing community standards of SPAM and abuse. Everything from forums
> to online dating sites rely on having a mechanism for filtering out
> communications and me
On 07/07/2011 11:39 AM, Ted Smith wrote:
> As such, I don't see why a fully distributed system, where each node
> detects spam and does not relay it, wouldn't suffice in any case. There
> is no reason for the power of deciding which messages are malicious and
> which aren't to be concentrated in
Hello all!
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 9:39 AM, John Walsh wrote:
>
> I just realised that the FreedomBox Foundation will have to offer a
> centralised DynamicDNS service for those FreedomBox users with an ISP
> provided Dynamic IP address. I am a user, but is this a reasonable
> assumption.
>
> If m
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 11:20 +0200, Robert Martinez wrote:
> > adding a "poster" image attribute to the html5 video on the front page
> > would be great.
>
> I added the poster image and the universalsubtitles.
>
> I can't find a way to pass
On 07/07/2011 12:43 PM, i...@churchkey.org wrote:
> If the Dynamic DNS based
> public directory I proposed is particularly troubling to you, perhaps we
> could focus on how that is different from DNS itself, the gpg
> keyservers
OpenPGP keyservers have no authority in and of themselves; the
inform
On Jul 7, 2011, at 6:43 PM, i...@churchkey.org wrote:
On 07/07/2011 11:39 AM, Ted Smith wrote:
As such, I don't see why a fully distributed system, where each node
detects spam and does not relay it, wouldn't suffice in any case.
There
is no reason for the power of deciding which messages ar
On 07/07/2011 01:27 PM, Bjarni Rúnar Einarsson wrote:
> Contrasting this with the GPG/keyserver idea, I'd like to point out that DNS
> is already a highly distributed scalable system with a global selection of
> providers already in place. The keyservers are relatively centralized and
> fragile by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/06/2011 02:43 PM, Tony Godshall wrote:
> anonymous. But I don't see why, if you've
> verified a claimed identity in some other
> reasonable sense you cannot sign someone's
> key even if its pseudonymous.
You can sign a pseudanonymous key and p
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
wrote:
>
> OpenPGP keyservers act as a gossiping cloud -- no one keyserver is "the
> most up-to-date" at any point. The only way that they're centralized is
> that we currently access them through DNS. Indeed, the worst problems
> we've had wit
On 07/07/2011 01:27 PM, Bjarni Rúnar Einarsson wrote:
> I just realised that the FreedomBox Foundation will have to offer a
> centralised DynamicDNS service for those FreedomBox users with an ISP
> provided Dynamic IP address. I am a user, but is this a reasonable
> assumption.
>
>
On 07/07/2011 02:43 PM, Bjarni Rúnar Einarsson wrote:
> However, if 100 dissidents use 1 different TLDs from 1000 different DNS
> providers,
FWIW, there are nowhere near 1 TLDs; you're probably not actually
interested in TLDs directly, but rather in the labels variously
described as "effec
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 06:43:06PM +, Bjarni Rúnar Einarsson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
> wrote:
>
> >
> > OpenPGP keyservers act as a gossiping cloud -- no one keyserver is "the
> > most up-to-date" at any point. The only way that they're centralized is
> >
On 07/07/2011 02:36 PM, The Doctor wrote:
> You can sign a pseudanonymous key and publish it. What you have to be
> cognizant of, however, is the trust level of the pseudanonymous key (set
> when the public key is signed), which ranges from 0 (no trust at all) to
> 5 (trust fully).
Urgh, this is
On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 16:14 +0200, Lukas Nagl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> although the topic is raised in various subjects, I think that there is
> a need for a specific place to talk about how different freedomboxes
> will be able to establish communication with each other.
>
> This question doesn't conc
On 07/07/2011 05:20 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 11:20 +0200, Robert Martinez wrote:
adding a "poster" image attribute to the html5 video on the front page
would be great.
I added the poster image and the universalsubtitles.
I can't find a way to pass the width/height at
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 11:41 PM, nathan nolast wrote:
> i think keysignings violate lutzs ease of use (grandma can use it) rule .
of course they do.
propose a solution.
___
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org
htt
>> (grandma can use it) rule .
>
> Can we please stop using "grandma" as the canonical non-technical user?
> The gender and age prejudice implicit in these statements only hurts
> efforts to build a diverse development community (and makes the
> community look like thoughtless jerks).
>
> If you d
On Jul 7, 2011, at 10:54 PM, Tony Godshall wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 11:41 PM, nathan nolast
wrote:
i think keysignings violate lutzs ease of use (grandma can use it)
rule .
of course they do. propose a solution.
The questions is more " Who decide whitch path we go ".
maybe we shou
Hey NYC FreedomBoxers, Shane Reustle is organizing an Open Internet
meetup next Thursday the 14th. 7pm in the North East corner of Bryant
Park. See you there!
http://www.meetup.com/openinternet/
___
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
Freedombox-discuss@lis
2011/7/7 Bjarni Rúnar Einarsson :
> Hello all!
>
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 9:39 AM, John Walsh wrote:
>>
>> I just realised that the FreedomBox Foundation will have to offer a
>> centralised DynamicDNS service for those FreedomBox users with an ISP
>> provided Dynamic IP address. I am a user, but i
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
wrote:
> On 07/07/2011 02:43 PM, Bjarni Rúnar Einarsson wrote:
> > However, if 100 dissidents use 1 different TLDs from 1000 different
> DNS
> > providers,
>
> FWIW, there are nowhere near 1 TLDs; you're probably not actually
> interested
On 07/07/2011 05:34 PM, Bjarni Rúnar Einarsson wrote:
> Those seizures all took place on .com/.net/... domains, right? I don't
> think the Americans have had the audacity to go after domains under TLDs
> nominally belonging to foreign countries yet.
So which country's government *is* an acceptabl
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Marc Manthey wrote:
>
> On Jul 7, 2011, at 10:54 PM, Tony Godshall wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 11:41 PM, nathan nolast
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> i think keysignings violate lutzs ease of use (grandma can use it) rule .
>>
>> of course they do. propose a solution.
>
On Jul 8, 2011, at 12:36 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 07/07/2011 05:34 PM, Bjarni Rúnar Einarsson wrote:
Those seizures all took place on .com/.net/... domains, right? I
don't
think the Americans have had the audacity to go after domains under
TLDs
nominally belonging to foreign coun
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 02:33:37PM -0700, Tony Godshall wrote:
> Is Tor centralized this way?
The Tor directory authorities are centralized, but the effect
of compromising a DNS root server is probably worse than
compromising a Tor directory authority.
If all the Tor directory authorities are bad
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:41 PM, nathan nolast wrote:
> i think keysignings violate lutzs ease of use (grandma can use it) rule .
Is it enough if people just sign their grandmas' keys?
___
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth
Hi Mike and Everybody
> Friendika was mentioned in this thread but in a different
> context, so I wanted to point out what we do for profile
> personas. There may be some ideas you can use. It's a
> distributed system, but has multiple profiles.
> You can tailor any profile for any person or
34 matches
Mail list logo
