On 12-07-21 at 10:05am, simo wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-07-21 at 10:36 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > On 12-07-20 at 04:42pm, berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 10:25:05AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > > On 12-07-19 at 02:09pm, Fifty Four wrote:
> > > > > So, und
>
> From: James Gilmore
>To: freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org
>Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2012 10:51 AM
>Subject: Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Would you sign a key with a pseudonymous
>keyholder name?
>
>
> [...]
>
>The whole point of key-signing is that y
Hi folks, releasing images on Saturday mornings doesn't really work all
that well with my schedule (particularly this week), so I'm pushing the
release date to Sunday around noon, instead of Saturday, around noon.
As a present for your patience, you'll have at least a GuruPlug image.
You might be
My policy is, when I'm certain that the person holding the key is the
person I expect to be holding the key, I don't have a problem
signing. Possibly they have identification proving that to me. Or possibly
I've communicated and interacted with them enough to remove all doubt. It
is the latter case
On Sat, 2012-07-21 at 10:36 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 12-07-20 at 04:42pm, berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 10:25:05AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > On 12-07-19 at 02:09pm, Fifty Four wrote:
> > > > So, under what conditions would you give a Level 3 s
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> As pointed out before, email is a can of worms easier avoided than
> handled properly. Because "properly" means more than the classic
> "reliably" and "without too much spam": FreedomBox "properly" includes
> "free from maintenance" and "p
http://www.solid-run.com/store/product
___
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
On 12-07-20 at 04:42pm, berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 10:25:05AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > On 12-07-19 at 02:09pm, Fifty Four wrote:
> > > So, under what conditions would you give a Level 3 signing to a
> > > pseudonymous name on a key? I assume a Level 3 si
