Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Trouble getting freedom box running, u-boot_2012.04.01-2_armel.deb, freedombox-unstable_2012.1021/ dreamplug 1001

2012-11-15 Thread Johan Henselmans
On 15 nov. 2012, at 04:05, Nick M. Daly wrote: > Johan, as you can see in the message included below, the errors X was > receiving while booting its DreamPlug are precisely the same errors you > had while booting your DreamPlug. > > This is the last conversation I had with X was after it update

[Freedombox-discuss] Keep or Remove the "Anonymous Contribution" Page?

2012-11-15 Thread Jack Wilborn
IMHO, I say that if they want to keep copyright to their code, then we probably don't want it in the FB. My understanding is that we wanted a copyright free box, has this changed or have I misunderstood? Then they want an anonymous copyright? Well that's questionable in itself, under our laws I

[Freedombox-discuss] Fwd: [PRIVACY] [apfma] Can the mother of all supercomputers save us from Big Brother?

2012-11-15 Thread Russell Edwards
Another independent call for a FreedomBox, more or less. I have sent the author an email with lots of links and thoughts... funnily enough he was my doctoral supervisor. Russell Original Message Subject: [PRIVACY] [apfma] Can the mother of all supercomputers save us from

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Email Encryption Basics

2012-11-15 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
Apropos of the ongoing Petraeus media circus-- a box with a simple setup to provide a basic email server would be very desirable to a lot of people right now.  It's amazing that the explicit story in the media isn't about data security-- but I can tell you from people's reactions who aren't eveni

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Email Encryption Basics

2012-11-15 Thread Sandy Harris
Jonathan Wilkes wrote: > Apropos of the ongoing Petraeus media circus-- a box with a simple setup > to provide a basic email server would be very desirable For complete email security, you need PGP for end-to-end encryption. That needs to be done on the end systems, not on the Box. There are th

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Email Encryption Basics

2012-11-15 Thread Sandy Harris
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: > Apropos of the ongoing Petraeus media circus-- ... EFF have an interesting analysis: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/11/when-will-our-email-betray-us-email-privacy-primer-light-petraeus-saga ___

[Freedombox-discuss] FreedomBox Unstable Image 2012.1111 Available

2012-11-15 Thread Nick M . Daly
FreedomBox Weekly Image Report == Author: Nick Daly Date: 2012-11-11 Sun Hi folks, welcome to the 17th weekly FreedomBox test image and progress report. Apologies this is two weeks and five days late, but life has been rougher t

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Trouble getting freedom box running, u-boot_2012.04.01-2_armel.deb, freedombox-unstable_2012.1021/ dreamplug 1001

2012-11-15 Thread Nick M. Daly
Johan Henselmans writes: > I had one remaining problem: Apparently the ethernet addresses are derived > from the uboot environment, which apparently are flushed > when I updated to the latest uboot firmware, ifconfig gave: > > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:00:00:00:00 > > by set

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Email Encryption Basics

2012-11-15 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 04:48:50PM -0500, Sandy Harris wrote: > The Box should, I think, support a webmail interface because > that is what many people are used to. That should use SSL > encryption by default; this protects mail on the wire or in the > air between the server and your desktop or la