Hello maintainer,
PS: I would like to have some PG binaries online,
too. If nobody else wants
to provide some, I could do so, but I am not sure if
BAHCL is okay with this!?
mf those PG binaries will be covered by the GNU GPL
mf version 2, and will have a link to the PG website.
there's
Hello,
Let me remind that the first 720 KB ODIN image I uploaded at http://linux.tu-varna.acad.bg/~lig/freedos/ODIN.720 wouldn't work on 8086/88 processors but required at least a NEC V20 or 80186/188 because I forgot the --8086 UPX option when compressing the files there. So I re-created it,
Fuck you all, donkeys, asses, bitchs and curs!
Please sorry for my bad knowing of the english language...
Go all you to the devil mothers, and wake for ever accursed that you have vote
against including my programs in FreeDOS new distribution program! Let on you all
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004, Luchezar Georgiev wrote:
I'm not sure if this has been answered before, but is it beter to
compile the kernel freecom under borland c or djgpp?
About FreeCOM: Let its author answer (he knows much better than me ;-)
Hi all, if you have been wondering why and why curses us:
It is Sandul Yura who has offered us 6 FreePascal and 25 Q-Basic
programs on first of November. We had the problem that there is
no Q-Basic for FreeDOS but I do not remember what was wrong with
the Pascal programs.
Programs were: ANSI
Hi!
15--2004 14:22 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Hall) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
KJD please run atapichk.exe from
More precise URL, please.
JH Binary is here:
Thank you, I already sent report to Keneth.
---
SF.Net is sponsored by:
Hi, I re-packaged PG 1.08 in FreeDOS package style (standard directory
tree) and added a binary. Please check my changes to PG.MAK and PG.H to
make this possible. In particular, I removed the pathspec for the plugin
and manpage directories. Bad thing, because functions will just fail
SILENTLY if
Luchezar Georgiev wrote:
Hi,
This written offer requirement is really scaring indeed. Does the GPL
say that it must be signed and stamped by a notary? Or passed through
the United Nations Security Council? ;-)
Just joking, of course - please don't take the above sentences seriously!
:-)
BTW,
I hope I don't start a flame war on this.
Thought I'd fwd this note that I found on the Groklaw site, usually a
good resource for legal issues dealing with Free and Open Source Software.
You've probably all seen by now that (part of) the source code to
Microsoft's WindowsNT and Windows2000 has
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 22:54:50 +0100 (MET), you wrote:
Hi,
our lower manpower should be enough. And of course this project is a challenge
and fun. Just writing a new Makefile for MS Sources would be a VERY boring way
to clone MS DOS functionality!
IMHO, if the Freedos' programs more superior,
10 matches
Mail list logo
