On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 01:58:56 +0100, Aitor SantamarÃa Merino wrote:
As far as I know, APPEND is considered dangerous and incompatible. It
had better stay missing.
Well, it is not aware of task switchers, it may have problems with
executing nested SHELLs, true. Many reasons why MS does NOT support
At 11:14 PM 3/26/2004 -0500, Adam Peart wrote:
>Now that I think about it, there is one slight bug with Descent 1, but I'm not sure
>if it's to due with emm386. I know with ms-dos 6.22 we never had this problem, but
>when you're playing, then switch to the map, then back to the game, the playin
At 08:56 PM 03/26/2004, you wrote:
Anyway, just an ACK that all problems I reported were solved in the RC,
inc. hello.exe (and Quake, FreePascal, same problem), and
Duke3d 800x600.
Thanks
Bart
Now that I think about it, there is one slight bug with Descent 1, but I'm
not sure if it's to due with
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Michael Devore wrote:
> There was a bug in EMM386. Map multiple pages, EMS 4.0 function 50h,
> was broken. I fixed that and Lemmings runs for me. Cute game, although
> I cannot play well enough to save any of them.
Those poor lemmings :-(
Anyway, just an ACK that all prob
At 11:06 AM 3/26/2004 -0500, Adam Peart wrote:
>Also, I ran slowdown and it still crashes.
>SLOWDOWN 3.10, (C) 1993-2002, Bret Johnson.
I added support for emulation of the WBINVD CPU instruction in EMM386. That appears
to be the last of what it needs, as SLOWDOWN was running on my system. Judg
At 04:32 PM 3/26/2004 +0100, you wrote:
>Hi, I installed the 24 March 2004 version of EMM386 and the test results
>are very promising, although I still do not know why you have to use HIMEM
>instead of FDXXMS (did not test HIMEM64. EMM386 binary is 30706 bytes). If
>you use FDXXMS, system crashes
On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 05:15, Luchezar Georgiev wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 23:45:13 -0600, Michael Devore wrote:
>
> > Second problem report: UDMA. Unfortunately UDMA 7.0 fails on my system
> > across the board, although it finds the controller and identifies it
> > plus the two drives. Unde
Luchezar Georgiev escribio':
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 20:08:32 -0300, Alain wrote:
about fat32 testing: I believe a working DOSFSCK 2.10 just what is
needed (not what is whished for).
Actually, I agree! If Eric can say "FreeDOS SMARTDRV is LBACACHE", why
not say "FreeDOS SCANDISK is DOSFSCK"? ;-)
Hi!
26-Мар-2004 21:31 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luchezar Georgiev) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> AFAIK, latest DOS version of TASM was 4.1. 5.x is version of TASM for
>> Win32.
LG> TASM 5.3 was released as a PE executable but then was converted to DOS
LG> using WDOSX, so it now works under DOS!
U
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 20:08:32 -0300, Alain wrote:
about fat32 testing: I believe a working DOSFSCK 2.10 just what is
needed (not what is whished for).
Actually, I agree! If Eric can say "FreeDOS SMARTDRV is LBACACHE", why not
say "FreeDOS SCANDISK is DOSFSCK"? ;-) DOSFSCK is not a SCANDISK, but
What version of TASM do you use? I haven't had LGDT problems with TASM
5.3 dated 30.V.2000.
AFAIK, latest DOS version of TASM was 4.1. 5.x is version of TASM for
Win32.
TASM 5.3 was released as a PE executable but then was converted to DOS
using WDOSX, so it now works under DOS! Undertunately, M
Hi!
Don't know how to easy (or not) to implement this feature, but MS-DEBUG
allows to write numeric argument without spaces before: "int3", "int21".
This may make harder to implement CMPXCHG8B instruction, but, if search will
be through alpha-tree (trie), then this shouldn't cause troubles (j
At 01:15 PM 3/26/2004 +0200, you wrote:
>On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 23:45:13 -0600, Michael Devore wrote:
>
>>Second problem report: UDMA. Unfortunately UDMA 7.0 fails on my system across the
>>board, although it finds the controller and identifies it plus the two drives.
>>Under both HIMEM with and
At 11:06 AM 3/26/2004 -0500, Adam Peart wrote:
>Interesting results between noems & ems. Before, noems wasn't working, but with this
>version it does. With noems:
>C:\>mem
>
>MEM: error: EMM call 41h
That's right. NOEMS turns off the page frame. Rest of the mem info looks reasonable.
>Also,
Hi!
26-Мар-2004 11:21 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (tom ehlert) wrote to Aitor Santamarэa
Merino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>emm386 RAM=m-n range for UMBs + EMS
>>>emm386 ROM=m-n range of RAM to be used to shadow ROM
>>> as soon as someone finds out what that's supposed to do _exactly_
ASM>> My guesses:
te>
Hi!
26-Мар-2004 13:15 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luchezar Georgiev) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
LG> What version of TASM do you use? I haven't had LGDT problems with TASM 5.3
LG> dated 30.V.2000.
AFAIK, latest DOS version of TASM was 4.1. 5.x is version of TASM for
Win32.
--
Hi!
26-Мар-2004 11:06 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam Peart) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
AP> Interesting results between noems & ems. Before, noems wasn't working, but
AP> with this version it does. With noems:
C:\>>mem
AP> MEM: error: EMM call 41h
In current MEMA this already changed (though, no
Hi all,
I want to announce the availability of the KC (Key Compiler) tool, which
is a tool for compiling text source keyboard descriptors into
binary-type KeybCBs that will be used by KEYB2.
In the binary pack, you have
- the compiler,
- documentation about the KEY language, that is used to desc
Hi!
25-Мар-2004 20:50 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
MD> 4M linear addresses. Apparently, TASM uses 24-bit mode for LGDT and LIDT
MD> even if it there is a 32-bit force attempt with PWORD PTR. Bah. I added an
MD> explicit DB 66h override to make the descriptor t
> echo 00: 0F 09 90 9D 66 58 C3 | xxd -r | ndisasm -
0F09 wbinvd
0002 90nop
0003 9Dpopf
0004 6658 pop eax
0006 C3ret
So your SLOWDOWN crash happens because SLOWDOWN tries to disable the
CPU cac
Interesting results between noems & ems. Before, noems wasn't working, but
with this version it does. With noems:
C:\>mem
MEM: error: EMM call 41h
Memory type Total - Used = Free (largest)
- - ---
Conventional640k 20.9k619k (
Hi,
tom ehlert escribió:
emm386 RAM=m-n range for UMBs + EMS
emm386 ROM=m-n range of RAM to be used to shadow ROM
as soon as someone finds out what that's supposed to do _exactly_
ASM> My guesses:
ASM> RAM
wrong guess
why? I mean, you don't know how to implement this... (see below)
AS
Hi, I found some points where newest HHSTNDRD (FreeDOS HELP command) is
outdated. First of all, it tells that it is "2003 by Rob..." instead of
2003-2004... Oh, and sometimes you have to press ESC instead of <- to go
back to the previous page. And APROPOS/WHATIS often displays strings twice
(in a
Hi, I installed the 24 March 2004 version of EMM386 and the test results
are very promising, although I still do not know why you have to use HIMEM
instead of FDXXMS (did not test HIMEM64. EMM386 binary is 30706 bytes). If
you use FDXXMS, system crashes as soon as UMB/XMS is used because IP wraps
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 23:45:13 -0600, Michael Devore wrote:
Second problem report: UDMA. Unfortunately UDMA 7.0 fails on my system
across the board, although it finds the controller and identifies it
plus the two drives. Under both HIMEM with and without EMM386, all four
DMA tests fail and the
>>HIMEM /INT15H=... should not be extremely hard to do, so I vote for it.
>>
ASM> That's another argument that I like: low cost to implement it. A third
ASM> opinion (or more) for the untie?
a nice argument indeed: Eric thinks that it won't cost *me* a lot of
time. LOL.
tom
--
>>> some others like Win 3.11 compat
>>> should probably be fixed before we call it FreeDOS 1.0 ...
>>
>> There is probably a patent to prevent us of it anyway :(
ASM> I don't think so... Did it prevent DR-DOS from doing that anyway? I
ASM> think it's just a question of misscompatibilities here o
>>emm386 RAM=m-n range for UMBs + EMS
>>emm386 ROM=m-n range of RAM to be used to shadow ROM
>>
>> as soon as someone finds out what that's supposed to do _exactly_
>>
ASM> My guesses:
ASM> RAM
wrong guess
ASM> My suspicion is ...
ASM> ROM, my guessing is (only a guessing), ...
e.g. Eric impl
Your message was refused by recipient's server filtering program.
Reason given was as follows:
Disallowed attach type
Reporting-MTA: dns; smtp4.libero.it
Received-from-MTA: dns; libero.it (151.38.102.104)
Arrival-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 10:18:20 +0100
Final-Recipient: rfc822; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Act
29 matches
Mail list logo
