Hello Eric,
2006/8/21, Eric Auer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> - DISPLAY somehow manages to resist LOADHIGH, Aitor! Maybe it
> just tries to be too clever...
Not at all. I remind you (discussed long ago) that it happens because
of UPX. The creation of DISPLAY is:
NASM => COM2EXE => UPX
I must use UPX,
Hi Blair, I did not check the updated htmlhelp (could some
more documentation-oriented people have a look?), but I did
test your new iso :-). As said in my earlier mail, most of
the new changes are very nice, thanks :-). The install now
works without any real problems - APART FROM the fact that
is
At 08:20 PM 8/20/2006 +0400, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
> MD> On the good news front, I am semi-reliably informed via
> semi-reliable MD> gossip that a new or greatly revised EMM386 model is
> being worked on. As May you share with us these gossip? Who, when,
> which model?
Now, now, it's
At 03:13 PM 8/20/2006 -0500, I wrote:
>At 09:59 PM 8/20/2006 +0200, Aitor Santamaría wrote:
> >That works, many thanks!
> >Would EMM386 be in webspace too? (the obvious /emm386 didn't work)
>
>I'll stick in there somewhere after we make Arkady happy. Well, happier.
Okay, besides the ftp site, the
He just sent me something off-list, but it's kind of hard to read as-is,
so I'll have to go through it to make a news item out of what he wrote.
Thanks.
-jh
Blair Campbell wrote:
> You should probably ask Eric for the changes :-)
>
>> Thanks, Blair!
>>
>> The fdkernel.lsm file wasn't upda
You should probably ask Eric for the changes :-)
On 8/20/06, Jim Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Blair Campbell wrote:
> > Ok, I took the time to upload proper kernel pacakges to
> > www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/dos/kernel/
> >
> > as kernel2037-binary.zip and kernel2037-sour
At 09:59 PM 8/20/2006 +0200, Aitor Santamaría wrote:
>That works, many thanks!
>Would EMM386 be in webspace too? (the obvious /emm386 didn't work)
I'll stick in there somewhere after we make Arkady happy. Well, happier.
-
U
At 12:03 AM 8/21/2006 +0400, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
>MD> I needed to release 2.25 and you weren't available during that particular
>MD> time period,
>
> I _was_ available. But I not see any letters from you in my postbox -
>so how you decide, that I was not available?
No, I based it on when
Hi!
20--2006 14:15 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
MD> I needed to release 2.25 and you weren't available during that particular
MD> time period,
I _was_ available. But I not see any letters from you in my postbox -
so how you decide, that I
That works, many thanks!
Would EMM386 be in webspace too? (the obvious /emm386 didn't work)
Aitor
2006/8/20, Michael Devore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> At 09:03 PM 8/20/2006 +0200, Aitor Santamaría wrote:
> >Sorry, again my problems to acceed Michael's FTP (I wonder why, I've been
> >using FileZilla,
At 09:03 PM 8/20/2006 +0200, Aitor Santamaría wrote:
>Sorry, again my problems to acceed Michael's FTP (I wonder why, I've been
>using FileZilla, any user/pwwd so that I can try?). Could someone send it
>in private to this mail?
You could try the HTTP protocol since the file is also placed in we
Ehr, may I ask you which address did you use?
I'd prefer this one, but if you did, could you please rename any ZIP
beforehand? I was told gmail removes any ZIP, and this may be the
proof :)
Thanks!
Aitor
2006/8/20, Arkady V.Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi!
>
> 20-Авг-2006 21:03 [EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi!
20-Авг-2006 21:03 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aitor Santamarэa) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
AS> Could someone send it in private to this mail?
>> ftp://ftp.devoresoftware.com/downloads/nomyso/ allows to assemble some
Done.
--
At 08:20 PM 8/20/2006 +0400, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
>:( 1. Name scheme not changed
You can name it whatever you want. I can give you a regex that would work
with current names, if you want to get fancy.
>BTW, Michael, what was prevent you to integrate patch directly? It doesn't
>changes gene
Hi!
20-Авг-2006 13:56 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
MD> drives the most downloads by far. Never would have thought that many BSD
MD> folks cared about converting TASM/MASM -> NASM source.
May be, because TASM/MASM syntax and language funct
Sorry, again my problems to acceed Michael's FTP (I wonder why, I've
been using FileZilla, any user/pwwd so that I can try?).
Could someone send it in private to this mail?
Aitor
2006/8/20, Arkady V.Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi!
>
> 20-Авг-2006 20:24 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bernd Blaauw) wrote t
Hi!
20-Авг-2006 20:24 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bernd Blaauw) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
BB> script is called NoMySo or something.
"Not My Sources". Excerpt from build.txt:
"
Build subsystem supports assembling by NASM and TASM and compilation by
Turbo C 2.01, Turbo C++ 1.01, B
At 09:56 PM 8/20/2006 +0400, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
>AS> from you), but I wouldn't say that the port to NASM is
>negligible. Trick is, that sources are _not_ ported to NASM
>(explicitly). :)
Took my machine about 1 minute to convert it, last I checked. FreeBSD
apparently likes Nomyso be
Hi!
20-Авг-2006 20:00 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aitor Santamarэa) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
>> AS> from you), but I wouldn't say that the port to NASM is negligible.
>> Trick is, that sources are _not_ ported to NASM (explicitly). :)
AS> ?
AS> I haven't tried to compile it after
Ok, I tought that after NOMISO the changes were being made over the
NASM sources, not the TASM ones :-((
Aitor
2006/8/20, Bernd Blaauw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Aitor Santamari'a schreef:
> > I haven't tried to compile it after the port to NASM, but I thought
> > that was the trick. So how does this
Aitor Santamari'a schreef:
> I haven't tried to compile it after the port to NASM, but I thought
> that was the trick. So how does this work?
>
original sources --> some PERL(?) script --> nasm sources.
run the script yourself, that's the challenge Michael has for us :)
script is called NoMySo
2006/8/20, Arkady V.Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi!
>
> 20-Авг-2006 19:02 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aitor Santamarэa) wrote to "tom ehlert"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
>
> AS> from you), but I wouldn't say that the port to NASM is negligible.
>
> Trick is, that sour
Hi!
20-Авг-2006 19:02 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aitor Santamarэa) wrote to "tom ehlert"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
AS> from you), but I wouldn't say that the port to NASM is negligible.
Trick is, that sources are _not_ ported to NASM (explicitly). :)
---
Micheal, if you're ever in Minneapolis, I will definitely buy you a
beer. It's been great having you on the list. I love reading your
emails with the biting humor. It's great! You keep things from getting
dull.
Seriously, you're a great developer, and we will miss you. You've
contributed
Hi,
2006/8/20, tom ehlert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello Aitor,
>
> > Thanks for that good piece of work.
> yes, indeed.
>
> > Besides these late fixings, you
> > did quite a lot of quite great follow-up to Tom's EMM386 (port to NASM
> > / new UPX are my two favourite).
>
> my favorite is VDS and VC
Blair Campbell wrote:
> Ok, I took the time to upload proper kernel pacakges to
> www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/dos/kernel/
>
> as kernel2037-binary.zip and kernel2037-source.zip
>
> Enjoy
>
> PS: They contain Eric's QB 4.0 compatibility fix.
>
>
Thanks, Blair!
The fdkernel.l
Hi!
19-Авг-2006 18:28 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
MD> Uploaded to ftp://ftp.devoresoftware.com/downloads/emm386/ are the files
MD> emmx225.zip, EMM386 2.25 and HIMEM version 3.25 memory manager, mostly
MD> executable files; and emms225.zip, sou
Hello Arkady,
BC>> What config.c??
>>> ML>Singlestepping (F8) is: OFF
>>> Looks like there definitely lost my config.c, with MS-DOS-like startup
>>> screen look and feel. :(
> There is no your guilty - config.c is part of kernel. When I heavily
> rework it, fix many things (and, as
Hello Aitor,
> Thanks for that good piece of work.
yes, indeed.
> Besides these late fixings, you
> did quite a lot of quite great follow-up to Tom's EMM386 (port to NASM
> / new UPX are my two favourite).
my favorite is VDS and VCPI; port to NASM and UPX is irrelevant compared to
that
Tom
>
Hi!
19-Авг-2006 21:35 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Blair Campbell) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
BC> What config.c??
>> ML>Singlestepping (F8) is: OFF
>> Looks like there definitely lost my config.c, with MS-DOS-like startup
>> screen look and feel. :(
There is no your guilt
Hello Michael,
Thanks for that good piece of work. Besides these late fixings, you
did quite a lot of quite great follow-up to Tom's EMM386 (port to NASM
/ new UPX are my two favourite).
All the best for whatever else you will be doing, in the times of
WinXP+ I am afraid that technical thourough c
Blair Campbell wrote:
> Ok, I took the time to upload proper kernel pacakges to
> www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/dos/kernel/
>
> as kernel2037-binary.zip and kernel2037-source.zip
>
> Enjoy
>
> PS: They contain Eric's QB 4.0 compatibility fix.
Thanks,
What is the difference b
Ok, I took the time to upload proper kernel pacakges to
www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/dos/kernel/
as kernel2037-binary.zip and kernel2037-source.zip
Enjoy
PS: They contain Eric's QB 4.0 compatibility fix.
--
Fall is my favorite season in Los Angeles, watching the birds chang
33 matches
Mail list logo
