Re: [Freedos-devel] Come visit EDR-DOS sites!

There can be as many compilers as there needs to be, but I think the whole point is to make the distribution less confusing, let's pick a particular tool and the distribution includes that, but you can download the other tool from the website. - Original Message - From: "Aitor Santamar

Re: [Freedos-devel] Come visit EDR-DOS sites!

Hi Jim, > They hadn't paid attentions to the messages telling them they were > about to format their hard drive, or they didn't realize what "format" > meant, or they sort of assumed FreeDOS would somehow be smart enough > _not_ to wipe their Windows partition. They wanted to know what I was > g

Re: [Freedos-devel] Come visit EDR-DOS sites!

I don't agree that there should be a single compiler, but if there's to be one, then we must have a 16-bit compiler, that leaves DJGPP out (so that's a good reason not to choose just one). AItor 2007/3/31, Florian Xaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > PS: > > And... one thing, which could also be posted a

Re: [Freedos-devel] Come visit EDR-DOS sites!

... > Again from the homepage: > "If you are new to DOS, we recommend you use an emulator to install > and boot FreeDOS." Most user KNOW that they can use an emulator now... > I would remove this sentense, because it isn't good, to tell new > users, that they SHOULD use another host-operating-syste

Re: [Freedos-devel] Come visit EDR-DOS sites!

PS: And... one thing, which could also be posted at FreeDOS's homepage...with other words than I, think about it: With DJGPP it is (very? ;-) easy to port MANY libraries to DOS... look at DJGPP's ftp-directories...there are many possiblities :-) Hasta luego! Flo -- Private Page, oZone GUI

Re: [Freedos-devel] Come visit EDR-DOS sites!

> * working FreeCOM on CD in user's selected language. and 4DOS should be a choicemaybe the standard. > People have done a great job on the FreeDOS 1.0 CD distribution yet it's > complex and sometimes hangs for people. Maybe some tools can be removed from the distro f.e. only include ONE