>> > and leaves both (!!!) files present in the directory and empty ...
>> Which both do you mean? It deletes the original,
>> so only the temp file still exists?
>
> YES, but the following rename call apparently recreates the original
> name,
Yes.
> but without deleting the temp name,
No, the
You are right,
But we do have a long history of using this list for pointing out DOS
related software.
- Original Message -
From: "Pat Villani"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 2:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] New RxDOS memory subsystem source code
> Actually, replying here woul
2009/6/18 dos386
>
> I possibly know what the problem is (re-confirmed with FD 2038 and EDR
> 2009-03-28) :
>
> 2. UIP seems to do a very strange thing: it brews a temp file (AH=$5A,
> regrettably not
> visible above, but there was ONE call to it per attempt), throws away
> the handle (!!!), and r
91 Bytes instead of IUP: "IUP-BUG" is no longer owned by IUP:
http://board.flatassembler.net/topic.php?t=10301 :-)
--
~~~ wow ~~~
--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified lice
> > and leaves both (!!!) files present in the directory and empty ...
> Which both do you mean? It deletes the original,
> so only the temp file still exists?
YES, but the following rename call apparently recreates the original name,
but without deleting the temp name, and both are now empty :-(
>> 1. For AH=$5A, EDR-DOS appends slash, FreeDOS doesn't ... what is more
>> valid ???
>
> Appending is valid. RBIL is wrong. MS-DOS 5+ appends it, not only version
> 5.
And just in case someone suspects "evil" usage of DEBUG to disassemble
MS-DOS: that wasn't even required here. Just test the
> 1. For AH=$5A, EDR-DOS appends slash, FreeDOS doesn't ... what is more
> valid ???
Appending is valid. RBIL is wrong. MS-DOS 5+ appends it, not only version
5.
> 2. UIP seems to do a very strange thing: it brews a temp file (AH=$5A,
> regrettably not
> visible above, but there was ONE call
dos386 schreef:
> Hi
>
>
>> If you set VERSION to something different than 5.xx
>>
>
> so "5" is the default ?
I'd assume most people use the FAT32 supporting binary for maximum
compatibility. Still there's multiple choices then as the FreeDOS kernel
can be compiled for i8086 or fully-opt
Hi
> If you set VERSION to something different than 5.xx
so "5" is the default ?
> in config sys then FreeDOS will behave in the more common DOS 3/4/6/7 style
Is this documented somewhere ??? Still, FreeDOS IMHO should default
harder to FDCONFIG, FREECOM etc. ;-)
> Please explain.
What didn't
Hi dos386!
> I possibly know what the problem is (re-confirmed with FD 2038 and EDR
> 2009-03-28) :
... thanks for debugging IUP :-)
> UI21DEB 2009-05-02 CFG: sel=<> hcb=$0400 ver=$3205 dcm=$02FB fif=$
... sorry I do not understand the long trace ...
> 1. For AH=$5A, EDR-DOS appends slash
> You're saying development of free DOS software is not on
> topic in the "FreeDOS devel" list?
Sorry, not __MY__ list, by I personally prefer this tiny piece of NASM
code from the bloated WtF/WfW 100% compatibility crap :-)
--
~~~ wow ~~~
-
I possibly know what the problem is (re-confirmed with FD 2038 and EDR
2009-03-28) :
**
UI21DEB 2009-05-02 CFG: sel=<> hcb=$0400 ver=$3205 dcm=$02FB fif=$
APP: ree=0 psp=$0528 nam= N/A
* AX=$4800 | C=0 AX=$16A4
* AX=$7147 [
I wrote:
> Oops, the "IUP-BUG" needs retest.
DONE !!!
Tom wrote ( http://www.drdosprojects.de/forum/drp_forum/posts/6667.html ) :
> IUP bug reproduced here. will try to fix this
Lack of time or forgotten ... :-(
> If reproducable, I'll try to fix those, too (if time allows)
At least 2 are fi
13 matches
Mail list logo
