On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Eric Auer wrote:
>
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> > In shell/command.c the following patch should fix the issue (assuming
> > switchar changed).
> > @@ -331,8 +331,10 @@
> > break;
> >case CMD_SPECIAL_DIR: /* pass '\\' & '.' too */
> > if(*rest == '\\'
Hi Jeremy,
> In shell/command.c the following patch should fix the issue (assuming
> switchar changed).
> @@ -331,8 +331,10 @@
> break;
>case CMD_SPECIAL_DIR: /* pass '\\' & '.' too */
> if(*rest == '\\' || *rest == '.' || *rest == ':') break;
> +if (!isoptch(*re
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Juan Manuel Guerrero
wrote:
> I do not know if this is the right place to report this FreCom issue and
> I do not know if this issue is already well known but I would like to
> report it anyway.
> Please inspect the following batch file:
>
> @echo off
> @echo %0
>
Am 19.07.2014 07:35, schrieb Steve Nickolas:
> On Sat, 19 Jul 2014, Mateusz Viste wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I think this problem goes beyond "path separators". As I understand it,
>> any argument including a slash character will get exploded. So yes, this
>> might be used as path separator, but not
Am 19.07.2014 00:37, schrieb Ralf Quint:
> On 7/18/2014 3:09 PM, Juan Manuel Guerrero wrote:
>> This is not really disappointing. I was only testing for the
>> possibility to recommend the FreeDOS 1.1 distribution as an
>> alternative to WinXP and/or Win98SE to build DJGPP ports but this
>> seems n
Hi Jim, DOS fans,
(your signature is too long! Who needs all those
kilo mega giga tera numbers explained so often?)
It seems that memristors are actually not really
slow to write :-) The article that you cite says
"Windows, Linux, HP-UX, Tru64, and NonStop" were
in the experiments. It does not r
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 4:45 AM, Jim Michaels wrote:
> - Original Message -
>
>> From: Steve Nickolas
>> To: Technical discussion and questions for FreeDOS developers.
>>
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 11:21 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS JetDirect driver (was: Ge
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 4:07 AM, Jim Michaels wrote:
>
> PTH for long-running math-type processes gives the equivalent performance of
> coroutines,
> where the thread runs until it blocks, then the other routine runs until it
> blocks, etc. this can run
> in user-space and requires no kerne
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Mateusz Viste wrote:
>
> I think this problem goes beyond "path separators". As I understand it, any
> argument including a slash character
> will get exploded. So yes, this might be used as path separator, but not
> only. For eg. sed expects slash
> delimi
if you didn't know, HP has started inventing a light-based computer using
memristors instead of an SSD and it moves 6TB of data/sec, it's based on a
continuum and uses very little power. so we have a paradigm shift here...
should be out at end of decade. they showed it at vegas, and are planning
- Original Message -
> From: Steve Nickolas
> To: Technical discussion and questions for FreeDOS developers.
>
> Cc:
> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 11:21 AM
> Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS JetDirect driver (was: Getting started)
>
> On Fri, 18 Jul 2014, Rugxulo wrote:
>
>> Hi,
PTH for long-running math-type processes gives the equivalent performance of
coroutines, where the thread runs until it blocks, then the other routine runs
until it blocks, etc. this can run in user-space and requires no kernel mods.
but threading requires kernel mods according to the pth docume
12 matches
Mail list logo
