Re: [Freedos-devel] An idea???

2016-02-18 Thread Mercury Thirteen
This was my intent for many years. Eventually I shelved the project because it a shell simply can't do all I wanted it to; I needed to go more low-level for that. At its heart, DOS (MS-, IBM-, Free- or otherwise) is a single tasking OS. What this means is that you /can/ make a shell program to

Re: [Freedos-devel] GUI shell

2016-02-18 Thread Maarten Vermeulen
My plan was from the beginning to make a GUI file manager. Nothing difficult only ‘simple’ because my other project, named by the signature, has sometimes a moment where I am stuck. At that moment I want to do something else something easier so that I can clear my mind for a bit. And I really ne

Re: [Freedos-devel] GUI shell

2016-02-18 Thread Rugxulo
Hi, On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 1:52 AM, Mateusz Viste wrote: > > As most people that responded yet, I do not use GUI stuff on DOS, hence > such application would be useless to me. Most of us don't, probably because it's hard to automate (script) things that way. > GUI projects were probably > inte

Re: [Freedos-devel] An idea???

2016-02-18 Thread Maarten Vermeulen
Okay, thank you! I will see what I get from it. :) I will also do some research. -Maarten Unless you want to read it: Ignore this, this is my signature… :) -- Working on: Bird OS 2017 1.0.0a (western screech-owl) - netraa...@gmail.com - birdos.2...@gmail.com "why? Because Freedos, that's why!"

Re: [Freedos-devel] An idea???

2016-02-18 Thread Tom Ehlert
another one : http://www.georgpotthast.de/g-gui/ and Windows 3.0. there is certainly no lack of GUI's for DOS. Many have tried, but noone came up with a GUI for DOS, with the possible exception of GEM, and Windows 3.x. The chance that exactly YOU come up with a useful one is very close to zero

Re: [Freedos-devel] An idea???

2016-02-18 Thread Louis Santillan
Forgot to mention NewDeal [0] and some other pre-Y2K GUIs [1]. [0] http://toastytech.com/guis/nd32.html [1] http://toastytech.com/guis/index.html On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Louis Santillan wrote: > Maarten, > > You should familiarize yourself with what's already been done. > OPENGEM/GEM [