Re: [Freedos-devel] DOS runtime library format

2020-12-30 Thread TK Chia
Hello Steve Nickolas, I've had ideas for bootstrapping a DOS using a separate IPL - and in fact FreeDOS did do this at one point.  This way, I'd be able to keep basic drivers out of the main kernel, enhancing portability - which wouldn't be a big deal with PC-compatibles, since the basic driver

Re: [Freedos-devel] DOS runtime library format

2020-12-30 Thread Ralf Quint
On 12/30/2020 7:29 AM, Robert Riebisch wrote: the question was about 'any "official" format', like in a standard, not if that can be done at all. When creating "a (new|first) standard", it's probably a good idea to look at existing solutions. Well, this all looks to me like looking for a so

Re: [Freedos-devel] DOS runtime library format

2020-12-30 Thread Robert Riebisch
Hi Tom, >>> Was there ever any "official" format for a shared runtime library under >>> MS-DOS? Windows has .DLL files, Linux has .KO files, and MS-DOS had... >>> what, exactly? In all my years DOSsing I've never heard of anything >>> official like this, so I'm pretty sure there was no such thing

Re: [Freedos-devel] DOS runtime library format

2020-12-30 Thread tom ehlert
>> Was there ever any "official" format for a shared runtime library under >> MS-DOS? Windows has .DLL files, Linux has .KO files, and MS-DOS had... >> what, exactly? In all my years DOSsing I've never heard of anything >> official like this, so I'm pretty sure there was no such thing (unless >>

Re: [Freedos-devel] DOS runtime library format

2020-12-30 Thread Robert Riebisch
Hi Mercury, > Was there ever any "official" format for a shared runtime library under > MS-DOS? Windows has .DLL files, Linux has .KO files, and MS-DOS had... > what, exactly? In all my years DOSsing I've never heard of anything > official like this, so I'm pretty sure there was no such thing (unl