On 2/23/2023 9:44 AM, Liam Proven wrote:
On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 at 23:12, Ralf Quint wrote:
I was jogging my memory a bit, and there was a specially NLM that needed
to be loaded on NW3.12 and NW 4.0 at least to get "long filename
support".
That's right. I believe it was called `OS2.NLM` because t
> But being MS-DOS 5.0 published when it was, after the quarrel with
> IBM, I can just speculate that if MS-DOS 5.0 needed more
> conventional memory, IFS would have been one of the first things to
> go. Which is a pity, because from those articles one can infer that
> it tried to make mounting fi
Hi,
El jue, 23 feb 2023, 0:19, Bret Johnson escribió:
> > Also I found references on IFSFUNC: in 2Fh (AH=11h), IFSFUNC
> > functions seem to be entangled with the network redirector
> > functions:
> >
> > http://www.ctyme.com/intr/int-2f.htm
> >
> > Apparently, these functions would be made avai
On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 at 23:12, Ralf Quint wrote:
>
> I was jogging my memory a bit, and there was a specially NLM that needed
> to be loaded on NW3.12 and NW 4.0 at least to get "long filename
> support".
That's right. I believe it was called `OS2.NLM` because the support
Novell had already implem
>> I don't know of a direct or fool-proof way to detect FAT32 support,
>> but maybe somebody else has come up with something.
>
> I believe DJGPP utils (2.04 beta or newer, e.g. 2.05 current) use
> the naive method of "only assume FAT32 if DOS version is 7". (By
> this I mean "du.exe","df.exe" etc.
