Before I permanently delete you, are you aware of this spam?
Pat
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Natan Saidon natan.sai...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://www.ribaturia.com/index-rhto25.php
--
WhatsUp Gold - Download Free
email if you would like to take over the role.
Pat Villani
Project Coordinator
--
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload
Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
My apologies for cross posting.
If you have access to Brookdale Community College in Lincroft, NJ, and want
to hear a talk given by yours truly, stop by this Tuesday, November 23. The
talk will be on operating system tool chains, debugging and writing OS start
up code, and it is based on a
OK folks. Time to put a stop to this thread. It's degenerated and the
content does not belong here.
Thanks you.
Pat Villani
Project Coordinator
--
Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Developer Program
a
choice of platform at the outset is necessary. (Conversely, nearly all code
is transportable among the various implementations.)
Bottom line: I could live and work with either choice -- Open Watcom or
GCC.
Walt
--- On *Sat, 8/21/10, Pat Villani p...@freedos.org* wrote:
From: Pat Villani p
over the
weekend. Should give me a good idea as to how hard the suggestion may be.
Pat
Project Coordinator
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Kenneth J. Davis jere...@fdos.org wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 12:44 AM, Pat Villani p...@freedos.org wrote:
Folks,
I'm thinking it would
.
In summary, the project is just what's up on SourceForge.net and may
include all base distribution code at some point in the future.
Seems reasonable?
Pat Villani
Project Coordinator
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Imre Leber imre.le...@telenet.be wrote:
I think you need to define what
Folks,
Can you review the bug tracker at
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=5109atid=105109 and let me know
what's valid. missing, etc.? I'm trying to plan/assign bug fixes.
Pat Villani
Project Coordinator
at. I could be wrong.
Pat Villani
Project Coordinator
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Christian Masloch c...@bttr-software.dewrote:
I'm thinking it would be a good idea to standardize on one C/C++ compiler
for the project. [...]
I would be interested in your opinions about standardizing
Good point.
Pat
Project Coordinator
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Travis Siegel tsie...@softcon.com wrote:
Regardless of what is finally settled on for use, it really needs to
be something that works from the freedos environment itself. It would
be kind of silly to tell folks that they
that I want to drop the build options currently in our
source code. Instead, I'd like to add Open Watcom to FreeCOM, install and
memory configs and build official releases with Open Watcom.
Care to share?
Pat Villani
Project Coordinator
I have actually been playing with different packages, and only found Linux
and Windows, maybe OS X somewhere but I don't remember for sure. Certainly
none for FreeDOS, and I'm not aware of any.
If you decide to move forward and refine it, I'll add it to the software
section.
Pat
On Wed, Jul
Where is this software?
Pat
Project Coordinator
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Jim Michaels jmich...@yahoo.com wrote:
Are any of my applications being incorporated into FreeDOS?
I am wondering if I should continue doing DOS development. I have the
opportunity to get a windows 7 computer,
Hmm... I guess I just didn't remember the terms of the license. I guess
that does change things.
Thanks Tom.
Pat
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:06 AM, Tom Ehlert t...@drivesnapshot.de wrote:
according to
http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~lcc-win32/http://www.cs.virginia.edu/%7Elcc-win32/
LCC is not
This is something we are definitely interested in. Contact me direct to
discuss it.
Pat Villani
FreeDOS project Coordinator
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 5:36 AM, Detlef Reimers detlefreim...@gmx.de wrote:
Hello, all FreeDos Developers,
I would like to offer two development packages for all
I thought I remembered LCC being offered once before, but did not remember
who, when, etc.
I followed LCC development for some time a few years ago, bought the book
and played with it. It's not bad, but for x86 systems it's not as efficient
at code generation as gcc, from what I recall. It's
Yes, for the moment it is all there is. We're working on some reported
bugs.
Pat
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 5:31 AM, BuraphaLinux Server
buraphalinuxser...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a 1.1? I am under the impression that although 1.0 may be
obsolete, it's all there is.
JGH
On 2/23/10,
As I said before, we should plan this off list before charging ahead.
I'm really pretty tied up until the end of the month, but we can start
now and I'll jump in as soon as I free up.
Send me email off list.
Pat
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Joe Emenaker j...@emenaker.com wrote:
Eric Auer
Hi Joe,
Welcome. Some answers:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 2:22 AM, Joe Emenaker j...@emenaker.com wrote:
snip ***
So, anyway, I'm excited about FreeDOS 1.1, and I want to help get it out the
door.
Thank you for volunteering.
As far as what I can offer. I'm pretty fluent in DOS batch
There quite a bit of interest in producing version 1.1 on some of our
other lists. As a result, I'm putting out a call for volunteers. I
know some of you already are responsible for various utilities and I'm
hoping that you will continue to help with version 1.1.
My personal goals for 1.1 in
me a bug report. It can be compiled for 16-bit or 32-bit.
Gregory Pietsch
- Original Message -
From: Pat Villani wb2...@gmail.com
To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2009 9:19:36 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [Freedos-devel] A call
Over the weekend, the ISP that handles our DNS did an upgrade and
unfortunately it didn't happen smoothly, so they are effectively down right
now. Based on what we know, this may take some time before they can correct
it.
Until this is fixed, www.freedos.org will not be resolvable in DNS, so it
Actually, replying here would be somewhat off topic. You'd be better
off doing so at that forum.
Pat
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Christian Maslochc...@bttr-software.de wrote:
Just linking this item for those of you interested:
http://www.bttr-software.de/forum/forum_entry.php?id=6772
Looks like a good list. Are these all there are? If not, would you
like to go through our open list and see what else needs attention?
I'll follow through with the mundane maintenance tasks of
updating/closing bugs.
Thanks.
Pat
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 9:38 AM, dos386dos...@gmail.com wrote:
So far, suggestions seem to be:
1. New device drivers to support new audio subsystems, disks, buses, etc..
2. Network device drivers
3. A built-in network TCP/IP stack.
4. DOS on other platforms with no change(?). I'm not sure if this means
strict real mode execution on ia32 and x86_64, and
Thanks all for taking FreeDOS to where it is. Since the time when
personal commitments no longer allowed me the luxury to contribute, this
team has taken FreeDOS forward and met the project's goal. We now have
a stable MS-DOS replacement that is open source and supported. I thank
you for your
If you folks were to extend the DOS API, in which direction would you
take it? Would you go with POSIX/UNIX/Linux, win32 or simply provide
the same API with extensions for modern functionality and platforms? Of
course, none of this is new. I'm just curious as to what the dyed in
the wool
Sorry for the wide distribution. I just wanted folks to know that I
voluntarily left HP. If you need to contact me off list, please use
this address instead.
Pat
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest candid
Hello everyone. Just subscribed to the mailing lists again.
I haven't followed development for some time now, and I must say that
the progress made since I've been gone is quite impressive. All the
folks here should be proud.
As for me, I'm going to just be lurking for a while. I have a
29 matches
Mail list logo
