Hi Eric,
> > Besides, can C compiler take NULLs \x0 as part of
> a
> > parameter string?
> No but it would be VERY simple to convert the 32bit
> value to an ASCII
A callee program has to convert it back to binary
value,
Is it straight forward in assembly lang. program?
Why we have to make a fuss?
Hi Eric,
> > 5. M$ Windows DOS box sychronize data not
> work
> > as Intra Application Communication Area 40:F0
> modified
>
> You did WHAT? Why that? This sounds very
> incompatible to
> whatever future extension to BIOS data area might
> show up.
> How can I disable it?
>
>
Hi,
I would like to announce PG 1.10 is ready now at
www.geocities.com/freedos_pg, changes include:
1. accepts lowercase commands again;
2. works fine and clean with 25,28,50 lines display
modes;
3. displays panning offset if > 0;
4. sychronizes data in plugins;
5. uses only 35K system memory as i
Hi,
It is working with a global
extern unsigned _heaplen = N bytes;
I might have a mistake earlier, after some extensive
tests, guru helpers' ideas proved sound and true.
Thank you very much indeed!
PG will take only 35K in runtime, when it shells out,
a 45K saved! I'll announce version 1.10 soo
--- Roberto Mariottini
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
的郵件內容：>
>
> > I want to know if there is a way to release memory
> > from the unused heap to the OS when I shell out?
> > PG runtime takes up 80K, but it needs about 40K.
> > I managed to move the stack down to a designated
> > address,
> > but memory w
--- "Arkady V.Belousov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
的郵件內容：> Hi!
>
> 27-磎�-2004 09:42 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (maintainer freedospg) wrote to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> mf> I want to know if there is a way to release
> memory
> mf> from the unused heap to the O
--- Eric Auer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 的郵件內容：>
> Hi!
>
> > PG runtime takes up 80K, but it needs about 40K.
> > Turbo C 2.01, small model.
>
> Small model = up to 64k code + up to 64k data. You
> could try other
> memory models, but I think it will NOT be worth the
> effort. If you
> use TINY model,
Hi,
I want to know if there is a way to release memory
from the unused heap to the OS when I shell out?
PG runtime takes up 80K, but it needs about 40K.
I managed to move the stack down to a designated
address,
but memory was not released.
Turbo C 2.01, small model.
Can somebody help?
regards,
BA
Hi Jeremy,
Thanks for you explanation.
Looks like DOSEMU's setting, I'll take your
suggestion.
BIN\PG.EXE
DOC\PG\PG.MAN
regards,
BAHCL
--- "Kenneth J. Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
的郵件內容：> >
> Not if you are only doing it for distribution
> package
> reasons, otherwise go ahead. While I encou
Hi Eric,
Thanks for your explanation!
And I should have known better.
>
> [This is a reply to the question by BAHCL: What if
> DOS\HELP ends up
> to contain several files which are all called
> readme? Answer: This
> does not happen. PG would only be "allowed" to have
> files DOS\HELP\PG
> an
Hi,
--- Jim Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 的郵件內容：> Alain
wrote:
>
> My thought would be to put them inside C:\DOS as
> subdirs.
>
> For example:
>
> DOS- all exe/com/sys files
> DOS\APPINFO- lsm files
> DOS\DOC\project- documentation for 'project'
> DOS\HELP
Hi,
A full version of PG is out for download now at
www.geocities.com/freedos_pg.
I replace the clone feature with the C's spawnlp() to
make PG able to search its plugins from the path; and
display the offset of the panning view. I name it
version 1.09.
After considering Jim's idea, PG109.ZIP con
--- Jim Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 的郵件內容：>
Thanks. Since this includes changes, I guess I
> shouldn't consider this
> an "official" release by BAHCL, so I won't mirror it
> on ibiblio.
> However, I will update the news item on FreeDOS.org
> to point to Eric's
> binary-included distribution of PG
Hi,
I am innocent, I joined this mailing list recently,
and
I am cursed too! My program (the Program CABinet) was
not enlisted either!
BAHCL
_
必殺技、飲歌、小星星...
浪漫鈴聲 情心連繫
http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=22281/*http://ringtone.yahoo.com.hk/
-
--- tom ehlert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 的郵件內容：>
Hello maintainer,
>
> >> PS: I would like to have some PG binaries online,
> >> too. If nobody else wants
> >> to provide some, I could do so, but I am not sure
> if
> >> BAHCL is okay with this!?
> >>
>
> mf> those PG binaries will be covered by the G
--- Eric Auer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>：>
> Eric.
>
> PS: I would like to have some PG binaries online,
> too. If nobody else wants
> to provide some, I could do so, but I am not sure if
> BAHCL is okay with this!?
>
Hi Eric,
It's okay, go ahead. The only thing I want to be sure
if
those PG binari
Hi,
I uploaded a batch file "setuptc.bat" to the PG
website
www.geocities.com/freedos_pg
Please download and unzip it in c:\tmp
Type "setuptc" to get a general information
Type "setuptc tc" to setup Turbo C 2.01, NASM 0.98.38
and in the directory C:\TC
This batch file continues to compile PG 1.0
Hi Lucho,
Usually there are people working as system operator
and
system coordinator to make things go as smooth as
possible, but such help is not available here, we have
constraint and threat instead. People still
interested
in DOS program today have to be aware DOS support can
hardly be compar
Hi Johnson,
I assume you have TC201.ZIP, NASM*.ZIP in C:\TMP, and
you have UNZIP, EDIT in your path, then follow these
steps:
1. MKDIR C:\TC
2. C:
3. CD\TC
4. UNZIP C:\TMP\TC201
5. you have 3 directories, DISK1,DISK2,DISK3
6. move all files from the above directories to C:\TC
7. MKDIR LIB
8. MOVE
--- Steve Nickolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 的郵件內容：>
At Sat, 14 Feb 2004 9:25am +0800, maintainer
> freedospg wrote:
>
> > Yes, no binary files, clean, space saving, no
> virus,
> > no non-GPL coding, use Turbo C 2.01 and NASM
> 0.98.??
> > to
> &
--- Johnson Lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 的郵件內容：> Hi
BAHCL,
>
> I found inside the ZIP archive is source code and
> manual but without
> binary, please check.
Yes, no binary files, clean, space saving, no virus,
no non-GPL coding, use Turbo C 2.01 and NASM 0.98.??
to
create them.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
Hi,
It is not easy to define the words 'free' and 'open'.
How free? How open? To what extent?
I don't know if my program developed in a propriatory
OS be defined as 'impure', but all softwares finally
make use of the BIOS that is also not 'free' to my
understanding.
IMHO, without propriatory soft
Hi Steve,
FreeDOS ODIN 0.6 works fine in my machine, all
programs no problem, thanks for your effort.
I even have FDXMS (not included) worked as well.
I found that COMMAND.COM version is 0.82pl2 not
0.82pl3.
Would it be better to have the diskette volume label
set to ODIN_0.6 so that I don't m
Hi Johnson,
My focus is gradually switching back to PG and have
your suggestion in mind, I hope:
1. PG file.1 file.2 ... file.n is what you want;
2. not required if the above feature works;
3. this will be fixed in next version;
Thanks!
BAHCL
--- Johnson Lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 的郵件內容：>
> 1)
24 matches
Mail list logo
