Hi!
31-Окт-2006 21:13 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bart Oldeman) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BO> --- makefile18 Jun 2003 19:40:32 - 1.2
BO> +++ makefile31 Oct 2006 21:13:02 - 1.3
BO> +BINLIST1 = doc bin/kernel.sys bin/sys.com
-
BO> - zip -9 -r -k ../ke$(VERSI
On 10/31/06, Arkady V.Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 31-Окт-2006 21:13 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bart Oldeman) wrote to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> BO> --- makefile18 Jun 2003 19:40:32 - 1.2
> BO> +++ makefile31 Oct 2006 21:13:02 - 1.3
> BO> +BINLIST1 = doc bin/kernel
>> Looks like this change wasn't tested.
> It looks like Eric has magic powers to produce .zip files anyway!
actually i do not use makefiles or batchfiles to create zip files.
but i have a question about the cvs kernels: which branch are you
working on? 2037 unstable or 2036 head? do you ha
> >> Looks like this change wasn't tested.
> > It looks like Eric has magic powers to produce .zip files anyway!
>
> actually i do not use makefiles or batchfiles to create zip files.
I wonder why those changes were made then.
> but i have a question about the cvs kernels: which branch are y
Hi!
1-Ноя-2006 04:04 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Auer) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
>>> Looks like this change wasn't tested.
>> It looks like Eric has magic powers to produce .zip files anyway!
EA> actually i do not use makefiles or batchfiles to create zip files.
EA> but i hav
Hi Arkady, Bart,
> This is what stops me currently from dealing with kernel, because there
> is no management centralization. Eric, do you support/control your kernel
> edition? What about Kenneth' edition? Who control and support CVS?
You can assume that I am the only maintainer of kernel 2036,
