Roberto Mariottini schreef:
Where I can find sources?
http://users.pandora.be/imre/FreeDOS/
the LSM files from all his other projects should also point to it.
now only LSM-file of RECOVER v0.1 points to it.
Bernd
---
This SF.Net email is spo
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Luchezar Georgiev
> Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 10:48 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] DOSFSCK >2G FAT32 bugs fixed!
>
> Just began
On Thu, 01 Apr 2004 11:07:34 +0300, you wrote:
Hi Lucho,
>Sorry, but I'm too busy for that. The TU-Varna server doesn't work now, so
>I can't even do (4). I can't even test how DOSFSCK writes/fixes bad
>volumes as I don't currently have one handy ;-)
If you need web space please tell me, I can
The TU-Varna server doesn't work now
Just began working so I put it at
http://linux.tu-varna.acad.bg/~lig/freedos/DOSFSCK.EXE (58 KB)
Happy testing! But please take into account that I don't maintain it!
Lucho
---
This SF.Net email is sponsore
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 22:07:55 +0100 (BST), Bart Oldeman wrote:
Hmm. Sorry I didn't check out how dosfsck is compiled but perhaps you
should compile with the GCC
-Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
options.
-Wmissing-declarations
may also come in handy
-Wnested-externs
sometimes too but it depends on your c
Салям!
31-Мар-2004 22:22 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luchezar Georgiev) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
LG> Caught it! VolumeSeek() wasn't declared anywhere so its return type was
LG> assimed int.
:( This is anohter reason, why I so hate C mode, when prototypes may be
omited. :( How much of other bugs p
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Luchezar Georgiev wrote:
> > Oops! VolumeSeek() should be loff_t(loff_t offset) instead of off_t
> > VolumeSeek(off_t offset)! But there must be yet another bug, because
> > when I changed it, the bug was still there, although the code generated
> > for VolumeSeek() became cor
Oops! VolumeSeek() should be loff_t(loff_t offset) instead of off_t
VolumeSeek(off_t offset)! But there must be yet another bug, because
when I changed it, the bug was still there, although the code generated
for VolumeSeek() became correct. Will try to catch the other bug
tomorrow.
Caught it!
