This thread has been opened for Jemm386 issues and discussion.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topic
Hi!
21-Дек-2006 13:14 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Japheth) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
J> This thread has been opened for Jemm386 issues and discussion.
Ok, I may discuss at public, if you wish.
1. On your site, program versions nowhere mentioned, only in "news"
sometime.
2. I se
Hi!
21-Дек-2006 18:22 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Japheth) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
>> Ok, I may discuss at public, if you wish.
J> I do not wish, but all your email addresses are "invalid" and you refused to
J> use the nice EDR-DOS forum.
Do you try [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 1
> I do not wish, but all your email addresses are "invalid" and you refused to
> use the nice EDR-DOS forum.
Hi Arkady, you have my whole simpaty, I also hate forums, it wastes too
much time to follow.
Some time ago you were involved in a dicussion about a
system/applicatio/?? that could rea
> no, see http://gra3/Jemm386.html
no, see http://www.japheth.de/Jemm386.html
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT
> Ok, I may discuss at public, if you wish.
I do not wish, but all your email addresses are "invalid" and you refused to
use the nice EDR-DOS forum.
> 1. On your site, program versions nowhere mentioned, only in "news"
> sometime.
no, see http://gra3/Jemm386.html
> 2. I see "Jemm386 ... b
>>> 1. On your site, program versions nowhere mentioned, only in "news"
>>> sometime.
> J> no, see http://gra3/Jemm386.html
> J> no, see http://www.japheth.de/Jemm386.html
>
> http://www.japheth.de/HX.html
> Find "2.1" -> not found
Yes, but you claimed program versions are *nowhere* mentioned, so
Hi!
21-Дек-2006 15:32 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alain M.) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
AM> Some time ago you were involved in a dicussion about a
AM> system/applicatio/?? that could read a forum and send messages to an
AM> Email, do you have something about it?
AFAIK, for some for
Hi!
21-Дек-2006 20:20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Japheth) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
1. On your site, program versions nowhere mentioned, only in "news"
sometime.
>> J> no, see http://www.japheth.de/Jemm386.html
>> http://www.japheth.de/HX.html
>> Find "2.1" -> not found
J> Y
Just to butt in :-) I understand jnc/jc/jz/jnz myself but I don't even
know what jae is. I would also prefer jnc/jz over jae or je.
--
Fall is my favorite season in Los Angeles, watching the birds change
color and fall from the trees.
David Letterman (1947 - )
See ya
---
Hi!
21-Дек-2006 14:23 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Blair Campbell) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
BC> Just to butt in :-) I understand jnc/jc/jz/jnz myself but I don't even
BC> know what jae is.
je - Equal (==)
jae - Above or Equal(unsigned >=)
ja - Above (unsi
Blair Campbell wrote:
> Just to butt in :-) I understand jnc/jc/jz/jnz myself but I don't even
> know what jae is. I would also prefer jnc/jz over jae or je.
>
>
ja/jae and jb/jbe are "jump if above/below", which work the same way as
jg/jge and jl/jle, except treating the operands as unsigned
>
> 320 bytes? Hard task, unless your code is ineffective :) or there is
> present some redundant functions.
>
> May you in short explain layout of your code? This should ease my
> findings.
the resident protected-mode code is in segment V86, the resident real-mode
code is in segment
Hi!
21-Дек-2006 19:03 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daniel Verkamp) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
DV> ja/jae and jb/jbe are "jump if above/below", which work the same way as
DV> jg/jge and jl/jle, except treating the operands as unsigned instead of
DV> signed.
There are also other diff
14 matches
Mail list logo
