Hi!
19-Авг-2006 15:04 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Markus Laire) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
ML> You didn't mention the software there, only the license, so I throught
ML> that you meant that you could give a license to someone else, and
ML> he/she should then download the program from il
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006, Andreas Bollhalder wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Markus Laire wrote:
>> I think it's quite clear that www.bootdisk.com is a warez-site.
> Where did you read that ? Do you really know, that they don't have asked
> for permission ? I saw this site
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Markus Laire wrote:
> I think it's quite clear that www.bootdisk.com is a warez-site.
Where did you read that ? Do you really know, that they don't have asked
for permission ? I saw this site mentioned in some really legal magazines...
> I think that
On 8/18/06, Michael Devore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If someone wanted to create a ruckus, they could point out that every time
> someone allowed a commercial program for testing and debugging be sent to
> anyone else, they technically violated copyright. And that's been accepted
> practice for
On 8/18/06, Andre Tertling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Markus Laire wrote:
> > I don't really know if it's legal to use illegally acquired program if
> > you have a license for the program but not the program itself.
>
> Do you really want to start a lengthy discussion about whether I am
> using a
I feel it's important to get "1.0" out there to draw a line in the sand,
that we're at least "1.0" quality. We can do what MS-DOS could do. Maybe
we have a few bugs, but (and maybe this is a sad fact) what "1.0"
software doesn't have bugs? People expect it. But marking a "1.0"
release means you
At 10:54 AM 8/18/2006 -0700, Blair Campbell wrote:
>So to end this thread, since Michael already seems to own MS-DOS but
>just wants an easier way of getting it on his hard drive, it is
>perfectly legal to use.
Well, who doesn't have legal MS-DOS, if they ever had a machine back
when. It was inc
So to end this thread, since Michael already seems to own MS-DOS but
just wants an easier way of getting it on his hard drive, it is
perfectly legal to use.
On 8/18/06, Michael Devore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 01:06 PM 8/18/2006 +0200, Andre Tertlingwrote:
>
> >P.S. I am sure I have a stack
At 01:06 PM 8/18/2006 +0200, Andre Tertlingwrote:
>P.S. I am sure I have a stack of MS-DOS licenses somewhere in the
>basement. If someone really wants to have one, feel free to apply.
Heck, I still have at least two sets of MS-DOS floppies down in basement
somewhere. Don't know if they work, b
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006, Andre Tertling wrote:
> Do you really want to start a lengthy discussion about whether I am
> using a legitimately created backup with my original license or not? For
> heaven's sake, I'll ship the original discs along with the license.
I might still be able to locate one of
Markus Laire wrote:
> I don't really know if it's legal to use illegally acquired program if
> you have a license for the program but not the program itself.
Do you really want to start a lengthy discussion about whether I am
using a legitimately created backup with my original license or not? Fo
Much 1.0 software is released with known bugs. We never said that
FreeDOS 1.0 would be bug free.
On 8/18/06, Markus Laire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/18/06, Eric Auer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You probably know that MS DOS 1.0 did not even
> > support subdirectories... ;-). While FreeD
On 8/18/06, Eric Auer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You probably know that MS DOS 1.0 did not even
> support subdirectories... ;-). While FreeDOS 1.0
> is delayed because we keep adding features to our
> wishlist. Some of which are beyond MS DOS 6.xx!
I wasn't really thinking MS DOS 1.0, but the at
On 8/18/06, Andre Tertling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would not say so. Michael compared MS DOS behaviour to
> > FreeDOS behaviour to find a bug. To ensure compatibility
> > (interoperability), even limited reverse engineering
> > would have been allowed in Germany. But that was not
IMHO rev
Hi!
18-Авг-2006 13:25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Markus Laire) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
>> >> Try www.bootdisk.com. boot622.exe will extract a usable MSDOS boot
>> > Is that legal?
>> > I didn't find any kind of legal FAQ from that site.
>> Nope.
ML> So FreeDOS 1.0 will be buggy sof
Eric Auer wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Try www.bootdisk.com. ...
Is that legal?
>>> Nope.
>
>> So FreeDOS 1.0 will be buggy software,
>> created using illegal software.
>
> I would not say so. Michael compared MS DOS behaviour to
> FreeDOS behaviour to find a bug. To ensure compatibility
> (intero
On 8/18/06, Lyrical Nanoha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Aug 2006, Markus Laire wrote:
>
> > On 8/17/06, Mark Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hi Michael:
> >>
> >> Try www.bootdisk.com. boot622.exe will extract a usable MSDOS boot
> >
> > Is that legal?
> > I didn't find any kind
Hi!
Try www.bootdisk.com. ...
>>> Is that legal?
>> Nope.
> So FreeDOS 1.0 will be buggy software,
> created using illegal software.
I would not say so. Michael compared MS DOS behaviour to
FreeDOS behaviour to find a bug. To ensure compatibility
(interoperability), even limited reverse e
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006, Markus Laire wrote:
> On 8/17/06, Mark Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Michael:
>>
>> Try www.bootdisk.com. boot622.exe will extract a usable MSDOS boot
>
> Is that legal?
> I didn't find any kind of legal FAQ from that site.
Nope.
-uso.
---
On 8/17/06, Mark Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Michael:
>
> Try www.bootdisk.com. boot622.exe will extract a usable MSDOS boot
Is that legal?
I didn't find any kind of legal FAQ from that site.
--
Markus Laire
-
U
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Michael Devore wrote:
> [sent again with the right SourceForge-approved e-mail address this time]
>
> Anybody have a MS-DOS 5.x or 6.x image around I could use? I need to do
> some side-by-side testing in Qemu of MS-DOS against FreeDOS. I had an
> image, but it seems to have
At 04:54 PM 8/17/2006 -0400, Mark Bailey wrote:
>Try www.bootdisk.com. boot622.exe will extract a usable MSDOS boot
>floppy.
Cool deal. What you sent boots up under Qemu no problemo. Thanks.
-
Using Tomcat but need to do
Hi Michael:
Try www.bootdisk.com. boot622.exe will extract a usable MSDOS boot
floppy. It wants a disk drive...if you don't have one, I'd suggest
using VFD to capture the image. (A very useful program that assigns
a drive letter to a "virtual" floppy disk drive and can use a file
as a floppy).
[sent again with the right SourceForge-approved e-mail address this time]
Anybody have a MS-DOS 5.x or 6.x image around I could use? I need to do
some side-by-side testing in Qemu of MS-DOS against FreeDOS. I had an
image, but it seems to have gone missing. Thanks.
-
24 matches
Mail list logo
