Hi!
18-Апр-2004 19:15 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Auer) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
EA> Hi, while MS Win98 MEM could be called a "standard", I do not agree with:
>>b7ff81920 DOS system code
>>9fff65536 DOS system code
EA> Those are video buffers - even if the MCBs
Hi!
18-Апр-2004 19:15 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Auer) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
EA> Hi, while MS Win98 MEM could be called a "standard", I do not agree with:
>>b7ff81920 DOS system code
>>9fff65536 DOS system code
EA> Those are video buffers - even if the MCBs
Eric Auer schreef:
Hi, while MS Win98 MEM could be called a "standard", I do not agree with:
b7ff81920 DOS system code
9fff65536 DOS system code
wait until 1.6 is released.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored
Hi, while MS Win98 MEM could be called a "standard", I do not agree with:
>b7ff81920 DOS system code
>9fff65536 DOS system code
Those are video buffers - even if the MCBs mark them as excluded / system code
or similar, a note would definitely not hurt. For exa
